Response to Evidence Call by House of Lords Constitution Committee on the Constitutional Implications of COVID-19 on Courts

Research output: Other contribution

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Submission to House of Lords Constitution Committee's call for evidence on constitutional impact of Covid-19 on courts, based on existing research on participative experiences of Litigants in Person in civil and family justice
Original languageEnglish
TypeRESPONSE TO EVIDENCE CALL BY HOUSE OF LORDS CONSTITUTION COMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF COVID-19 ON COURTS
Number of pages7
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2020

Keywords

  • remote justice; litigants in person; access to justice; participation; courts; tribunals

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Evidence Call by House of Lords Constitution Committee on the Constitutional Implications of COVID-19 on Courts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Activities

    • 1 Publication Peer-review
    • 1 Invited talk

    Modern Law Review (Journal)

    Grainne Mc Keever (Reviewer)

    3 Aug 2020

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workPublication Peer-review

    File

    Judicial Review during Covid

    Grainne Mc Keever (Speaker)

    18 Jun 2020

    Activity: Talk or presentationInvited talk

    Research Output

    • 3 Article
    • 1 Other contribution
    • 1 Discussion paper

    Comparing courts and tribunals through the lens of legal participation

    McKeever, G., 10 Apr 2020, In : Civil Justice Quarterly. 39, 3, p. 217-236 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Remote hearings: Litigants in Person and effective participation

    McKeever, G., 2020.

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    File
  • Open Access
  • Cite this