Researching Paramilitary Violence in Northern Ireland

Dermot Feenan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper examines methodological challenges in researching paramilitary violence, withparticular reference to the author’s examination of paramilitary ‘punishment’ activity inNorthern Ireland. The author notes the dearth of published work on methodological issuesin social science research of violence generally. The range of major qualitative studies onparamilitary violence is presented and discussed. The paper explains the context ofconducting such research in Northern Ireland in terms of the broader political conflict. Itthen examines several key challenges in researching paramilitary violence based primarilyon the author’s research. These included maintenance of political sensitivity, good faith andcautious security protocols. Potential legal and ethical difficulties were addressed throughdesign of interview schedules that minimized risk of disclosure of the names or identities ofthose subject to ‘punishment’ or the perpetrators of offences. Those subject to paramilitary‘punishment’ proved ‘hard-to-reach’, requiring greater time and effort in meeting the initialtarget sample, and a consequent need to research across a wide range of voluntary andcommunity-based organizations. While risks of physical injury were minimal, successfulresearch in the field was achieved through transparency about the impartiality and fundingindependence of the researchers, and a strategic sensitivity towards community and political backgrounds.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages147-163
    JournalInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology
    Volume5
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Fingerprint

    violence
    penalty
    political conflict
    transparency
    faith
    Ireland
    social science
    offense
    examination
    interview
    community
    time

    Cite this

    @article{7011de4cc74540db94a3ad74be7f0fd0,
    title = "Researching Paramilitary Violence in Northern Ireland",
    abstract = "This paper examines methodological challenges in researching paramilitary violence, withparticular reference to the author’s examination of paramilitary ‘punishment’ activity inNorthern Ireland. The author notes the dearth of published work on methodological issuesin social science research of violence generally. The range of major qualitative studies onparamilitary violence is presented and discussed. The paper explains the context ofconducting such research in Northern Ireland in terms of the broader political conflict. Itthen examines several key challenges in researching paramilitary violence based primarilyon the author’s research. These included maintenance of political sensitivity, good faith andcautious security protocols. Potential legal and ethical difficulties were addressed throughdesign of interview schedules that minimized risk of disclosure of the names or identities ofthose subject to ‘punishment’ or the perpetrators of offences. Those subject to paramilitary‘punishment’ proved ‘hard-to-reach’, requiring greater time and effort in meeting the initialtarget sample, and a consequent need to research across a wide range of voluntary andcommunity-based organizations. While risks of physical injury were minimal, successfulresearch in the field was achieved through transparency about the impartiality and fundingindependence of the researchers, and a strategic sensitivity towards community and political backgrounds.",
    author = "Dermot Feenan",
    year = "2002",
    doi = "10.1080/13645570110045972",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "147--163",
    journal = "International Journal of Social Research Methodology",
    issn = "1364-5579",
    number = "2",

    }

    Researching Paramilitary Violence in Northern Ireland. / Feenan, Dermot.

    In: International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2002, p. 147-163.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Researching Paramilitary Violence in Northern Ireland

    AU - Feenan, Dermot

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - This paper examines methodological challenges in researching paramilitary violence, withparticular reference to the author’s examination of paramilitary ‘punishment’ activity inNorthern Ireland. The author notes the dearth of published work on methodological issuesin social science research of violence generally. The range of major qualitative studies onparamilitary violence is presented and discussed. The paper explains the context ofconducting such research in Northern Ireland in terms of the broader political conflict. Itthen examines several key challenges in researching paramilitary violence based primarilyon the author’s research. These included maintenance of political sensitivity, good faith andcautious security protocols. Potential legal and ethical difficulties were addressed throughdesign of interview schedules that minimized risk of disclosure of the names or identities ofthose subject to ‘punishment’ or the perpetrators of offences. Those subject to paramilitary‘punishment’ proved ‘hard-to-reach’, requiring greater time and effort in meeting the initialtarget sample, and a consequent need to research across a wide range of voluntary andcommunity-based organizations. While risks of physical injury were minimal, successfulresearch in the field was achieved through transparency about the impartiality and fundingindependence of the researchers, and a strategic sensitivity towards community and political backgrounds.

    AB - This paper examines methodological challenges in researching paramilitary violence, withparticular reference to the author’s examination of paramilitary ‘punishment’ activity inNorthern Ireland. The author notes the dearth of published work on methodological issuesin social science research of violence generally. The range of major qualitative studies onparamilitary violence is presented and discussed. The paper explains the context ofconducting such research in Northern Ireland in terms of the broader political conflict. Itthen examines several key challenges in researching paramilitary violence based primarilyon the author’s research. These included maintenance of political sensitivity, good faith andcautious security protocols. Potential legal and ethical difficulties were addressed throughdesign of interview schedules that minimized risk of disclosure of the names or identities ofthose subject to ‘punishment’ or the perpetrators of offences. Those subject to paramilitary‘punishment’ proved ‘hard-to-reach’, requiring greater time and effort in meeting the initialtarget sample, and a consequent need to research across a wide range of voluntary andcommunity-based organizations. While risks of physical injury were minimal, successfulresearch in the field was achieved through transparency about the impartiality and fundingindependence of the researchers, and a strategic sensitivity towards community and political backgrounds.

    U2 - 10.1080/13645570110045972

    DO - 10.1080/13645570110045972

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 147

    EP - 163

    JO - International Journal of Social Research Methodology

    T2 - International Journal of Social Research Methodology

    JF - International Journal of Social Research Methodology

    SN - 1364-5579

    IS - 2

    ER -