Representing victims and offenders in contemporary performance: the ideal and the complex in Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure

Amanda Finch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article uses the criminological frameworks of ideal and complex victims to explore the Donmar Warehouse’s 2018 production of Measure for Measure that grounded the play in references to the Me Too movement. This production staged two versions of the play in one performance, including regendering and role-switching of the central antagonists, which drew attention to the gender dynamics of victimization and offence. While the traditional Isabella was shown to be a nigh perfect ideal victim, when she assumed the offender’s role and victimized Angelo, no neat reversal of power roles was possible. A framework that allows for more complex understandings of victims and offenders is necessary to read this version and to apprehend these issues in real life contexts. This article argues that representations of victims and offenders in theatrical performance have the power to affect understandings of victimization in broader socio-legal contexts and therefore deserve close analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146-168
Number of pages23
JournalLaw and Humanities
Volume15
Issue number2
Early online date4 Oct 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 4 Oct 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Law
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Shakespeare
  • ideal victims
  • complex victims
  • offenders
  • cross-gender performance
  • sexual assault
  • Ideal victim
  • representation
  • feminist theory
  • complex victim
  • theatre
  • performance
  • ideal offender

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Representing victims and offenders in contemporary performance: the ideal and the complex in Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this