‘Reimaging: Mural Painting and the State in Northern Ireland’

Bill Rolston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article focuses on the long history of mural painting in Northern Ireland and specifically on the changing relationship between mural painting and the state in various eras. Originally unionist murals were state-friendly, painted as part of the annual celebration of King William’s victory at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. Later, murals were seen as beyond the pale, each for their own reasons; republican murals supported the armed struggle of the IRA against the state, while loyalist murals glorified the campaign of the loyalist paramilitary groups to terrorise the nationalist population. As the peace process took hold in Northern Ireland, republicans began to transform their own images; loyalists found this task more problematic, leading the state to intervene to fund the re-imaging of murals, thereby seeking to remove all offensive and military iconography. The article ends by critically assessing the outcome of the state’s Re-imaging Communities Programme.
LanguageEnglish
Pages447-466
JournalInternational Journal of Cultural Studies
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Mural Paintings
Northern Ireland
Murals
Loyalist
Republican
Imaging
Paramilitaries
Victory
Iconography
History
Military
Peace Process
Unionists
Nationalists

Keywords

  • Loyalists
  • murals
  • Northern Ireland
  • re-imaging
  • republicans

Cite this

@article{e466644c91b6474e81e787b1ec69b0d3,
title = "‘Reimaging: Mural Painting and the State in Northern Ireland’",
abstract = "This article focuses on the long history of mural painting in Northern Ireland and specifically on the changing relationship between mural painting and the state in various eras. Originally unionist murals were state-friendly, painted as part of the annual celebration of King William’s victory at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. Later, murals were seen as beyond the pale, each for their own reasons; republican murals supported the armed struggle of the IRA against the state, while loyalist murals glorified the campaign of the loyalist paramilitary groups to terrorise the nationalist population. As the peace process took hold in Northern Ireland, republicans began to transform their own images; loyalists found this task more problematic, leading the state to intervene to fund the re-imaging of murals, thereby seeking to remove all offensive and military iconography. The article ends by critically assessing the outcome of the state’s Re-imaging Communities Programme.",
keywords = "Loyalists, murals, Northern Ireland, re-imaging, republicans",
author = "Bill Rolston",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1177/1367877912451810",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "447--466",
journal = "International Journal of Cultural Studies",
issn = "1367-8779",
number = "5",

}

‘Reimaging: Mural Painting and the State in Northern Ireland’. / Rolston, Bill.

In: International Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 15, No. 5, 06.08.2012, p. 447-466.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Reimaging: Mural Painting and the State in Northern Ireland’

AU - Rolston, Bill

PY - 2012/8/6

Y1 - 2012/8/6

N2 - This article focuses on the long history of mural painting in Northern Ireland and specifically on the changing relationship between mural painting and the state in various eras. Originally unionist murals were state-friendly, painted as part of the annual celebration of King William’s victory at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. Later, murals were seen as beyond the pale, each for their own reasons; republican murals supported the armed struggle of the IRA against the state, while loyalist murals glorified the campaign of the loyalist paramilitary groups to terrorise the nationalist population. As the peace process took hold in Northern Ireland, republicans began to transform their own images; loyalists found this task more problematic, leading the state to intervene to fund the re-imaging of murals, thereby seeking to remove all offensive and military iconography. The article ends by critically assessing the outcome of the state’s Re-imaging Communities Programme.

AB - This article focuses on the long history of mural painting in Northern Ireland and specifically on the changing relationship between mural painting and the state in various eras. Originally unionist murals were state-friendly, painted as part of the annual celebration of King William’s victory at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690. Later, murals were seen as beyond the pale, each for their own reasons; republican murals supported the armed struggle of the IRA against the state, while loyalist murals glorified the campaign of the loyalist paramilitary groups to terrorise the nationalist population. As the peace process took hold in Northern Ireland, republicans began to transform their own images; loyalists found this task more problematic, leading the state to intervene to fund the re-imaging of murals, thereby seeking to remove all offensive and military iconography. The article ends by critically assessing the outcome of the state’s Re-imaging Communities Programme.

KW - Loyalists

KW - murals

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - re-imaging

KW - republicans

U2 - 10.1177/1367877912451810

DO - 10.1177/1367877912451810

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 447

EP - 466

JO - International Journal of Cultural Studies

T2 - International Journal of Cultural Studies

JF - International Journal of Cultural Studies

SN - 1367-8779

IS - 5

ER -