Recovering the History of Human Rights: Public Finances and Human Rights

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The Chapter considers a number of themes. First, it highlights that questions about revenue and expenditure were often not far removed from the early debates about rights. Second, as might be expected, the concerns of these early rights advocates were dissimilar to the aims of modern mainstream human rights law, frequently being bound up with the protection of private property. This does not mean that early concerns about rights and public finances are irrelevant today. Third, some rights advocates (Paine and Kant) highlighted more progressive arguments about finance and rights that are still especially relevant today. Fourth, that the early debates treat rights as more a political than a juridical notion and this more political notion needs to be reasserted for modern rights advocacy.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationHuman Rights and Public Finance
EditorsAoife Nolan, Rory O'Connell, Colin Harvey
Pages107-122
Publication statusPublished - 21 Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Human Rights
History
Public Finance
Expenditure
Immanuel Kant
Revenue
Advocacy
Finance
Private Property

Cite this

O'Connell, R. (2013). Recovering the History of Human Rights: Public Finances and Human Rights. In A. Nolan, R. O'Connell, & C. Harvey (Eds.), Human Rights and Public Finance (pp. 107-122)
O'Connell, Rory. / Recovering the History of Human Rights: Public Finances and Human Rights. Human Rights and Public Finance. editor / Aoife Nolan ; Rory O'Connell ; Colin Harvey. 2013. pp. 107-122
@inbook{0dce1d8d7a074036b1eb471134df26ba,
title = "Recovering the History of Human Rights: Public Finances and Human Rights",
abstract = "The Chapter considers a number of themes. First, it highlights that questions about revenue and expenditure were often not far removed from the early debates about rights. Second, as might be expected, the concerns of these early rights advocates were dissimilar to the aims of modern mainstream human rights law, frequently being bound up with the protection of private property. This does not mean that early concerns about rights and public finances are irrelevant today. Third, some rights advocates (Paine and Kant) highlighted more progressive arguments about finance and rights that are still especially relevant today. Fourth, that the early debates treat rights as more a political than a juridical notion and this more political notion needs to be reasserted for modern rights advocacy.",
author = "Rory O'Connell",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "21",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781841130118",
pages = "107--122",
editor = "Aoife Nolan and Rory O'Connell and Colin Harvey",
booktitle = "Human Rights and Public Finance",

}

O'Connell, R 2013, Recovering the History of Human Rights: Public Finances and Human Rights. in A Nolan, R O'Connell & C Harvey (eds), Human Rights and Public Finance. pp. 107-122.

Recovering the History of Human Rights: Public Finances and Human Rights. / O'Connell, Rory.

Human Rights and Public Finance. ed. / Aoife Nolan; Rory O'Connell; Colin Harvey. 2013. p. 107-122.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Recovering the History of Human Rights: Public Finances and Human Rights

AU - O'Connell, Rory

PY - 2013/10/21

Y1 - 2013/10/21

N2 - The Chapter considers a number of themes. First, it highlights that questions about revenue and expenditure were often not far removed from the early debates about rights. Second, as might be expected, the concerns of these early rights advocates were dissimilar to the aims of modern mainstream human rights law, frequently being bound up with the protection of private property. This does not mean that early concerns about rights and public finances are irrelevant today. Third, some rights advocates (Paine and Kant) highlighted more progressive arguments about finance and rights that are still especially relevant today. Fourth, that the early debates treat rights as more a political than a juridical notion and this more political notion needs to be reasserted for modern rights advocacy.

AB - The Chapter considers a number of themes. First, it highlights that questions about revenue and expenditure were often not far removed from the early debates about rights. Second, as might be expected, the concerns of these early rights advocates were dissimilar to the aims of modern mainstream human rights law, frequently being bound up with the protection of private property. This does not mean that early concerns about rights and public finances are irrelevant today. Third, some rights advocates (Paine and Kant) highlighted more progressive arguments about finance and rights that are still especially relevant today. Fourth, that the early debates treat rights as more a political than a juridical notion and this more political notion needs to be reasserted for modern rights advocacy.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781841130118

SP - 107

EP - 122

BT - Human Rights and Public Finance

A2 - Nolan, Aoife

A2 - O'Connell, Rory

A2 - Harvey, Colin

ER -

O'Connell R. Recovering the History of Human Rights: Public Finances and Human Rights. In Nolan A, O'Connell R, Harvey C, editors, Human Rights and Public Finance. 2013. p. 107-122