TY - JOUR
T1 - Recontextualizing the George Brown Collection through Creative Ceramics
AU - McHugh, Christopher
N1 - Reference text: Adams, Julie 2014. ‘Making the Past Present: Paul Montague in New Caledonia’,
conference presentation, Pacific Presences: Oceanic Art and European Museums ,
Corpus Christi College, University of Cambridge, 24 March 2014.
Adamson, Glenn 2009. ‘You Are Here’, in Edmund deWaal Signs andWonders: Edmund
deWaal and theV&A Ceramics Galleries . London: V&A Publishing, pp. 33–47.
Barker, David. and Teresita Majewski 2006. ‘Ceramic studies in historical archaeology’,
in Dan Hicks and Mary C Beaudry (eds.) The Cambridge companion to historical
archaeology . Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–231.
Brown, Deidre 2007. ‘Te Ahu Hiko: Digital heritage and indigenous objects, people and
environments’, in Fiona Cameron and Sarah Kenderdine (eds.) Theorizing Digital
Culture Heritage: A Critical Discourse . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.77–92.
Brown, George 1908. Pioneer-Missionary and Explorer, an Autobiography, A Narrative
of Forty-Eight Years Residence and Travel in Samoa, New Britain, New Ireland, New
Guinea, and the Solomon Islands , London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Brown, Stephanie. 2001, ‘Pioneer Printer’, Keramik, no.3: 28–33.
Collections Trust 2009. Revisiting Museum Collections, A toolkit for capturing and sharing
multiple perspectives on museum and gallery collections , Cambridge: Collections Trust.
<http://www.collectionstrust.org.uk/images/documents/c1/a514/f6/revisiting_
museums_toolkit-1.pdf>.
Connerton, Paul 2009. How Modernity Forgets . Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Dixon, Stephen 2014. ‘Fragments and narratives: reflections on a residency at the
V&A’, <http://www.ceramics-in-the-expanded-field.com/essays/professor-stephendixon-
uk>, accessed 02.08.14.
Edwards, Elizabeth 2009. ‘Photographs as objects of memory’, in Fiona Candlin and
Raiford Guins (eds.) The Object Reader . London; NewYork: Routledge, pp. 331–342.
Frayling, Christopher 1985. ‘Eduardo Paolozzi and the Temple of Doom’, in Eduardo
Paolozzi Lost Magic Kingdoms and Six Paper Moons from Nahuatl: An Exhibition at
the Museum of Mankind . London: British Museum Press, pp. 159–160.
Gardner, Helen B 1999. ‘Controversial Collection: The George Brown Exhibition, 10
March–31 May 1999’, Minpaku Anthropology Newsletter , no. 9 (December 1999):
7–8
Gardner, Helen B. 2006. Gathering for God: George Brown in Oceania. Dunedin: Otago University
Press.
Gell, Alfred 1998. Art and Agency:An Anthropological Theory . Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Gibson, Ross 2013. ‘On the senses and semantic excess in photographic evidence’,
Journal of Material Culture , 18(3): 243–257.
Gosden, Christopher 2004. ‘Making and display: our aesthetic appreciation of things
and objects’, in Colin Renfrew, Christopher Gosden and Elizabeth DeMarrais
(eds.) Substance, Memory and Display: Archaeology and Art . McDonald Institute for
Archaeological Research: Cambridge, pp.35–45.
Hastrup, Frida 2010. ‘Materializations of disaster: recovering lost plots in a tsunamiaffected
village in south India’, in Mikkel Bille, et al. (eds.) An Anthropology of Absence:
Materializations of Transcendence and Loss . Berlin: Springer, pp. 99–114.
Heidegger, Martin 1971. Poetry, Language, Thought , translations and introduction by
Albert Hofstadter. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
Hodder, Ian 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and
Things . Malden; Oxford; Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hyde, Sally 2012. ‘Milburn Family History: My connection to William Milburn, 1771–
1849, Master Potter of Scott’s Pottery Sunderland’. <http://www.whatsyourstory.
org.uk/page_id__177_path__0p3p.aspx#return> accessed 10.07.14.
Ishimori, Shuzo 1999. ‘On the George Brown Collection’, Minpaku Anthropology
Newsletter , no. 9 (December 1999): 8–9.
Knowles, Chantal 2003. ‘Commissioning Art: Objects, Ethnography and Contemporary
Collecting’, Journal of Museum Ethnography , no. 15: 57–66.
Kromek 2014. RadAngel: Safety in Numbers , product website, available at <http://www.
radangel.net/>, accessed 18.09.14.
Kü chler, Susanne 2002. Malanggan:Art, Memory and Sacrifice . Oxford ; NewYork: Berg
Matsuzaki, Asako 2002. ‘Nihon shutsudo no yoroppa toujiki’, in Katsu Kobayashi
(ed.) Unearthed Cities: speculations from comparisons of excavated articles in Japan and
Netherlands . Tokyo: Nichigai Associates, Inc., pp.133–170.
Marshall, Yvonne. and Alexandra Maas 1997. ‘Dashing Dishes’, World Archaeology,
28(3), Culture Contact and Colonialism (Feb. 1997): 275–290.
McHugh, Christopher J 2012. Kith and Kin: New Glass and Ceramics Stage 2—The
Crinson Jug . <http://www.twmuseums.org.uk/engage/blog/kith-and-kin-new-glassand-
ceramics-stage-2-the-%E2%80%98crinson-jug%E2%80%99/>
McHugh, Christopher J 2013. ‘Towards a Sunderland Pottery for the Twenty-First Century: Materializing
Multiple Dialogues in Museum Display Through Creative Ceramics’, Journal of
Museum Ethnography , no. 26: 71–88.
McKay, Carol 2014. ‘Christopher McHugh Flotsam and Jetsam (Portmanteau)’,
catalogue entry in Mike Collier (ed.) Wordsworth and Basho-: Walking Poets . Art
Editions North, Manchester: Cornerhouse Publications, pp. 106–111.
McLeod, Malcolm 1985. ‘Paolozzi and Identity’, in Eduardo Paolozzi Lost Magic
Kingdoms and Six Paper Moons from Nahuatl: An Exhibition at the Museum of
Mankind . London: British Museum Press, pp. 15–60.
Newell, Jenny 2012. ‘Old objects, new media: Historical collections, digitization and
affect’, Journal of Material Culture , 17(3): 287–306.
Olsen, B 2010. In Defense of Things:Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects . Lanham and
Plymouth: Altamira Press.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - The George Brown Collection has a complex and contested history, reflecting a range of personal and wider socio-political trajectories. Brown largely accumulated the collection between 1860 and 1907, whilst serving as a Methodist missionary in Oceania. The collection has had a number of homes over the years, exercising the endeavours of a variety of people. In 1986, the majority of it was controversially sold by Newcastle University to the National Museum of Ethnology (NME), Osaka, Japan. Between January and April 2013, I was the recipient of an Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) international placement which took place at the NME. Although my doctoral project, of which the placement formed part, focuses on Sunderland Museum & Winter Gardens’ (SMWG) collection of mainly nineteenth century Sunderland pottery (see McHugh 2013), researching the George Brown Collection enabled me to further test my approach to collection and community, albeit in a substantially different setting.This paper will reflect upon my attempt to investigate, through creative ceramic practice, what status and role the George Brown Collection has within the community at its current home in Japan. I will also explore parts of the collection which, for various reasons, remain in UK museums. It is hoped that these insights will contribute to discussions of how collections can be rejuvenated and reinterpreted in alternative ways, particularly through arts practice, leading to increased access and collaboration.
AB - The George Brown Collection has a complex and contested history, reflecting a range of personal and wider socio-political trajectories. Brown largely accumulated the collection between 1860 and 1907, whilst serving as a Methodist missionary in Oceania. The collection has had a number of homes over the years, exercising the endeavours of a variety of people. In 1986, the majority of it was controversially sold by Newcastle University to the National Museum of Ethnology (NME), Osaka, Japan. Between January and April 2013, I was the recipient of an Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) international placement which took place at the NME. Although my doctoral project, of which the placement formed part, focuses on Sunderland Museum & Winter Gardens’ (SMWG) collection of mainly nineteenth century Sunderland pottery (see McHugh 2013), researching the George Brown Collection enabled me to further test my approach to collection and community, albeit in a substantially different setting.This paper will reflect upon my attempt to investigate, through creative ceramic practice, what status and role the George Brown Collection has within the community at its current home in Japan. I will also explore parts of the collection which, for various reasons, remain in UK museums. It is hoped that these insights will contribute to discussions of how collections can be rejuvenated and reinterpreted in alternative ways, particularly through arts practice, leading to increased access and collaboration.
KW - george brown
KW - collection
KW - ethnography
KW - museum
KW - engagement
KW - ceramics
M3 - Article
VL - 28
SP - 85
EP - 106
JO - Journal of Museum Ethnography
JF - Journal of Museum Ethnography
SN - 0954-7169
ER -