Abstract
Relational frame theory (RFT) as a behavior-analytic approach to understanding
human language and cognition is now over 40 years old. However, the last 8 years
have seen a relatively intense period of empirical and conceptual developments
within the theory. Some of this work has begun to draw on early and much underplayed
features of RFT, including field-theoretical analyses and concepts. These
analyses are relatively nascent and thus the current article aims to provide a relatively
detailed example of a field-theoretical analysis of a specific RFT research program.
We begin with a brief overview of the “traditional” RFT approach to human
language and cognition, followed by a summary of recent research involving the
implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the differential arbitrarily applicable
relational responding effects (DAARRE) model. We then go on to consider
the DAARRE model in the context of J. R. Kantor’s interbehavioral formula for the
psychological event. Having done so, we conclude that the challenge involved in
analyzing increasingly complex forms of human language and cognition appears to
call for more field-based theorizing in some form or another.
human language and cognition is now over 40 years old. However, the last 8 years
have seen a relatively intense period of empirical and conceptual developments
within the theory. Some of this work has begun to draw on early and much underplayed
features of RFT, including field-theoretical analyses and concepts. These
analyses are relatively nascent and thus the current article aims to provide a relatively
detailed example of a field-theoretical analysis of a specific RFT research program.
We begin with a brief overview of the “traditional” RFT approach to human
language and cognition, followed by a summary of recent research involving the
implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the differential arbitrarily applicable
relational responding effects (DAARRE) model. We then go on to consider
the DAARRE model in the context of J. R. Kantor’s interbehavioral formula for the
psychological event. Having done so, we conclude that the challenge involved in
analyzing increasingly complex forms of human language and cognition appears to
call for more field-based theorizing in some form or another.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 675-690 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Perspectives on Behavior Science |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 9 May 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 30 Sept 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
Data Availability Statement
This article does not contain any original data.Funding
Preparation of this article was supported by grants awarded to the first author by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP; Grant #2019/24210-0 and #2023/09493-1).
| Funder number |
|---|
| 2023/09493-1, 2019/24210-0 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- RFT
- DAARRE
- Interbehavioral field
- Psychological event
- IRAP
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Recent Developments in RFT Encourage Interbehavioral Field-Based Views of Human Language and Cognition: A Preliminary Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver