Reasons why patients referred to diabetes education programmes choose not to attend: a systematic review

Geraldine Horigan, Mark Davies, Florence Findlay-White, David Chaney, Vivien Coates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims
To identify the reasons why those offered a place on diabetes education programmes declined the opportunity.

Background
It is well established that diabetes education is critical to optimum diabetes care; it improves metabolic control, prevents complications, improves quality of life and empowers people to make informed choices to manage their condition. Despite the significant clinical and personal rewards offered by diabetes education, programmes are underused, with a significant proportion of patients choosing not to attend.MethodsA systematic search of the following databases was conducted for the period from 2005–2015: Medline; EMBASE; Scopus; CINAHL; and PsycINFO. Studies that met the inclusion criteria focusing on patient-reported reasons for non-attendance at structured diabetes education were selected.

Results
A total of 12 studies spanning quantitative and qualitative methodologies were included. The selected studies were published in Europe, USA, Pakistan, Canada and India, with a total sample size of 2260 people. Two broad categories of non-attender were identified: 1) those who could not attend for logistical, medical or financial reasons (e.g. timing, costs or existing comorbidities) and 2) those who would not attend because they perceived no benefit from doing so, felt they had sufficient knowledge already or had emotional and cultural reasons (e.g. no perceived problem, denial or negative feelings towards education). Diabetes education was declined for many reasons, and the range of expressed reasons was more diverse and complex than anticipated.

Conclusion
New and innovative methods of delivering diabetes education are required which address the needs of people with diabetes whilst maintaining quality and efficiency.
LanguageEnglish
Pages14-26
JournalDiabetic medicine
Volume34
Issue number1
Early online date15 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Education
Pakistan
Reward
Sample Size
Canada
Comorbidity
India
Emotions
Quality of Life
Databases
Efficiency
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Structured diabetes education

Cite this

Horigan, Geraldine ; Davies, Mark ; Findlay-White, Florence ; Chaney, David ; Coates, Vivien. / Reasons why patients referred to diabetes education programmes choose not to attend: a systematic review. In: Diabetic medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 14-26.
@article{4faa52c36a0349138a4ed74781c0f460,
title = "Reasons why patients referred to diabetes education programmes choose not to attend: a systematic review",
abstract = "AimsTo identify the reasons why those offered a place on diabetes education programmes declined the opportunity.BackgroundIt is well established that diabetes education is critical to optimum diabetes care; it improves metabolic control, prevents complications, improves quality of life and empowers people to make informed choices to manage their condition. Despite the significant clinical and personal rewards offered by diabetes education, programmes are underused, with a significant proportion of patients choosing not to attend.MethodsA systematic search of the following databases was conducted for the period from 2005–2015: Medline; EMBASE; Scopus; CINAHL; and PsycINFO. Studies that met the inclusion criteria focusing on patient-reported reasons for non-attendance at structured diabetes education were selected.ResultsA total of 12 studies spanning quantitative and qualitative methodologies were included. The selected studies were published in Europe, USA, Pakistan, Canada and India, with a total sample size of 2260 people. Two broad categories of non-attender were identified: 1) those who could not attend for logistical, medical or financial reasons (e.g. timing, costs or existing comorbidities) and 2) those who would not attend because they perceived no benefit from doing so, felt they had sufficient knowledge already or had emotional and cultural reasons (e.g. no perceived problem, denial or negative feelings towards education). Diabetes education was declined for many reasons, and the range of expressed reasons was more diverse and complex than anticipated.ConclusionNew and innovative methods of delivering diabetes education are required which address the needs of people with diabetes whilst maintaining quality and efficiency.",
keywords = "Structured diabetes education",
author = "Geraldine Horigan and Mark Davies and Florence Findlay-White and David Chaney and Vivien Coates",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1111/dme.13120",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "14--26",
journal = "Diabetes Medicine",
issn = "0742-3071",
number = "1",

}

Reasons why patients referred to diabetes education programmes choose not to attend: a systematic review. / Horigan, Geraldine; Davies, Mark; Findlay-White, Florence; Chaney, David; Coates, Vivien.

In: Diabetic medicine, Vol. 34, No. 1, 15.04.2016, p. 14-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasons why patients referred to diabetes education programmes choose not to attend: a systematic review

AU - Horigan, Geraldine

AU - Davies, Mark

AU - Findlay-White, Florence

AU - Chaney, David

AU - Coates, Vivien

PY - 2016/4/15

Y1 - 2016/4/15

N2 - AimsTo identify the reasons why those offered a place on diabetes education programmes declined the opportunity.BackgroundIt is well established that diabetes education is critical to optimum diabetes care; it improves metabolic control, prevents complications, improves quality of life and empowers people to make informed choices to manage their condition. Despite the significant clinical and personal rewards offered by diabetes education, programmes are underused, with a significant proportion of patients choosing not to attend.MethodsA systematic search of the following databases was conducted for the period from 2005–2015: Medline; EMBASE; Scopus; CINAHL; and PsycINFO. Studies that met the inclusion criteria focusing on patient-reported reasons for non-attendance at structured diabetes education were selected.ResultsA total of 12 studies spanning quantitative and qualitative methodologies were included. The selected studies were published in Europe, USA, Pakistan, Canada and India, with a total sample size of 2260 people. Two broad categories of non-attender were identified: 1) those who could not attend for logistical, medical or financial reasons (e.g. timing, costs or existing comorbidities) and 2) those who would not attend because they perceived no benefit from doing so, felt they had sufficient knowledge already or had emotional and cultural reasons (e.g. no perceived problem, denial or negative feelings towards education). Diabetes education was declined for many reasons, and the range of expressed reasons was more diverse and complex than anticipated.ConclusionNew and innovative methods of delivering diabetes education are required which address the needs of people with diabetes whilst maintaining quality and efficiency.

AB - AimsTo identify the reasons why those offered a place on diabetes education programmes declined the opportunity.BackgroundIt is well established that diabetes education is critical to optimum diabetes care; it improves metabolic control, prevents complications, improves quality of life and empowers people to make informed choices to manage their condition. Despite the significant clinical and personal rewards offered by diabetes education, programmes are underused, with a significant proportion of patients choosing not to attend.MethodsA systematic search of the following databases was conducted for the period from 2005–2015: Medline; EMBASE; Scopus; CINAHL; and PsycINFO. Studies that met the inclusion criteria focusing on patient-reported reasons for non-attendance at structured diabetes education were selected.ResultsA total of 12 studies spanning quantitative and qualitative methodologies were included. The selected studies were published in Europe, USA, Pakistan, Canada and India, with a total sample size of 2260 people. Two broad categories of non-attender were identified: 1) those who could not attend for logistical, medical or financial reasons (e.g. timing, costs or existing comorbidities) and 2) those who would not attend because they perceived no benefit from doing so, felt they had sufficient knowledge already or had emotional and cultural reasons (e.g. no perceived problem, denial or negative feelings towards education). Diabetes education was declined for many reasons, and the range of expressed reasons was more diverse and complex than anticipated.ConclusionNew and innovative methods of delivering diabetes education are required which address the needs of people with diabetes whilst maintaining quality and efficiency.

KW - Structured diabetes education

U2 - 10.1111/dme.13120

DO - 10.1111/dme.13120

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 14

EP - 26

JO - Diabetes Medicine

T2 - Diabetes Medicine

JF - Diabetes Medicine

SN - 0742-3071

IS - 1

ER -