Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research Implementation Science

Jo Rycroft-Malone, Brendan McCormack, Alison M Hutchinson, Kara DeCorby, Tracey K Bucknall, Bridie Kent, Alyce Schultz, Erna Snelgrove-Clarke, Cheryl B Stetler, Marita Titler, Lars Wallin, Valerie Wilson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    146 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    BackgroundRealist synthesis is an increasingly popular approach to the review and synthesis of evidence, which focuses on understanding the mechanisms by which an intervention works (or not). There are few published examples of realist synthesis. This paper therefore fills a gap by describing, in detail, the process used for a realist review and synthesis to answer the question 'what interventions and strategies are effective in enabling evidence-informed healthcare?' The strengths and challenges of conducting realist review are also considered. MethodsThe realist approach involves identifying underlying causal mechanisms and exploring how they work under what conditions. The stages of this review included: defining the scope of the review (concept mining and framework formulation); searching for and scrutinising the evidence; extracting and synthesising the evidence; and developing the narrative, including hypotheses. ResultsBased on key terms and concepts related to various interventions to promote evidenceinformed healthcare, we developed an outcome-focused theoretical framework. Questions were tailored for each of four theory/intervention areas within the theoretical framework and were used to guide development of a review and data extraction process. The search for literature within our first theory area, change agency, was executed and the screening procedure resulted in inclusion of 52 papers. Using the questions relevant to this theory area, data were extracted by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. Synthesis involved organisation of extracted data into evidence tables, theming and formulation of chains of inference, linking between the chains of inference, and hypothesis formulation. The narrative was developed around the hypotheses generated within the change agency theory area. ConclusionsRealist synthesis lends itself to the review of complex interventions because it accounts for context as well as outcomes in the process of systematically and transparently synthesising relevant literature. While realist synthesis demands flexible thinking and the ability to deal with complexity, the rewards include the potential for more pragmatic conclusions than alternative approaches to systematic reviewing. A separate publication will report the findings of the review.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalImplementation Science
    Volume7
    Issue number33
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 19 Apr 2012

    Fingerprint

    Delivery of Health Care
    Aptitude
    Reward
    Research
    Publications
    Thinking

    Cite this

    Rycroft-Malone, J., McCormack, B., Hutchinson, A. M., DeCorby, K., Bucknall, T. K., Kent, B., ... Wilson, V. (2012). Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research Implementation Science. Implementation Science, 7(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-33
    Rycroft-Malone, Jo ; McCormack, Brendan ; Hutchinson, Alison M ; DeCorby, Kara ; Bucknall, Tracey K ; Kent, Bridie ; Schultz, Alyce ; Snelgrove-Clarke, Erna ; Stetler, Cheryl B ; Titler, Marita ; Wallin, Lars ; Wilson, Valerie. / Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research Implementation Science. In: Implementation Science. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 33.
    @article{bb12cdd739e440dfa69b023d1492de87,
    title = "Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research Implementation Science",
    abstract = "BackgroundRealist synthesis is an increasingly popular approach to the review and synthesis of evidence, which focuses on understanding the mechanisms by which an intervention works (or not). There are few published examples of realist synthesis. This paper therefore fills a gap by describing, in detail, the process used for a realist review and synthesis to answer the question 'what interventions and strategies are effective in enabling evidence-informed healthcare?' The strengths and challenges of conducting realist review are also considered. MethodsThe realist approach involves identifying underlying causal mechanisms and exploring how they work under what conditions. The stages of this review included: defining the scope of the review (concept mining and framework formulation); searching for and scrutinising the evidence; extracting and synthesising the evidence; and developing the narrative, including hypotheses. ResultsBased on key terms and concepts related to various interventions to promote evidenceinformed healthcare, we developed an outcome-focused theoretical framework. Questions were tailored for each of four theory/intervention areas within the theoretical framework and were used to guide development of a review and data extraction process. The search for literature within our first theory area, change agency, was executed and the screening procedure resulted in inclusion of 52 papers. Using the questions relevant to this theory area, data were extracted by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. Synthesis involved organisation of extracted data into evidence tables, theming and formulation of chains of inference, linking between the chains of inference, and hypothesis formulation. The narrative was developed around the hypotheses generated within the change agency theory area. ConclusionsRealist synthesis lends itself to the review of complex interventions because it accounts for context as well as outcomes in the process of systematically and transparently synthesising relevant literature. While realist synthesis demands flexible thinking and the ability to deal with complexity, the rewards include the potential for more pragmatic conclusions than alternative approaches to systematic reviewing. A separate publication will report the findings of the review.",
    author = "Jo Rycroft-Malone and Brendan McCormack and Hutchinson, {Alison M} and Kara DeCorby and Bucknall, {Tracey K} and Bridie Kent and Alyce Schultz and Erna Snelgrove-Clarke and Stetler, {Cheryl B} and Marita Titler and Lars Wallin and Valerie Wilson",
    year = "2012",
    month = "4",
    day = "19",
    doi = "10.1186/1748-5908-7-33",
    language = "English",
    volume = "7",
    journal = "Implementation Science",
    issn = "1748-5908",
    publisher = "BioMed Central",
    number = "33",

    }

    Rycroft-Malone, J, McCormack, B, Hutchinson, AM, DeCorby, K, Bucknall, TK, Kent, B, Schultz, A, Snelgrove-Clarke, E, Stetler, CB, Titler, M, Wallin, L & Wilson, V 2012, 'Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research Implementation Science', Implementation Science, vol. 7, no. 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-33

    Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research Implementation Science. / Rycroft-Malone, Jo; McCormack, Brendan; Hutchinson, Alison M; DeCorby, Kara; Bucknall, Tracey K; Kent, Bridie; Schultz, Alyce; Snelgrove-Clarke, Erna; Stetler, Cheryl B; Titler, Marita; Wallin, Lars; Wilson, Valerie.

    In: Implementation Science, Vol. 7, No. 33, 19.04.2012.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research Implementation Science

    AU - Rycroft-Malone, Jo

    AU - McCormack, Brendan

    AU - Hutchinson, Alison M

    AU - DeCorby, Kara

    AU - Bucknall, Tracey K

    AU - Kent, Bridie

    AU - Schultz, Alyce

    AU - Snelgrove-Clarke, Erna

    AU - Stetler, Cheryl B

    AU - Titler, Marita

    AU - Wallin, Lars

    AU - Wilson, Valerie

    PY - 2012/4/19

    Y1 - 2012/4/19

    N2 - BackgroundRealist synthesis is an increasingly popular approach to the review and synthesis of evidence, which focuses on understanding the mechanisms by which an intervention works (or not). There are few published examples of realist synthesis. This paper therefore fills a gap by describing, in detail, the process used for a realist review and synthesis to answer the question 'what interventions and strategies are effective in enabling evidence-informed healthcare?' The strengths and challenges of conducting realist review are also considered. MethodsThe realist approach involves identifying underlying causal mechanisms and exploring how they work under what conditions. The stages of this review included: defining the scope of the review (concept mining and framework formulation); searching for and scrutinising the evidence; extracting and synthesising the evidence; and developing the narrative, including hypotheses. ResultsBased on key terms and concepts related to various interventions to promote evidenceinformed healthcare, we developed an outcome-focused theoretical framework. Questions were tailored for each of four theory/intervention areas within the theoretical framework and were used to guide development of a review and data extraction process. The search for literature within our first theory area, change agency, was executed and the screening procedure resulted in inclusion of 52 papers. Using the questions relevant to this theory area, data were extracted by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. Synthesis involved organisation of extracted data into evidence tables, theming and formulation of chains of inference, linking between the chains of inference, and hypothesis formulation. The narrative was developed around the hypotheses generated within the change agency theory area. ConclusionsRealist synthesis lends itself to the review of complex interventions because it accounts for context as well as outcomes in the process of systematically and transparently synthesising relevant literature. While realist synthesis demands flexible thinking and the ability to deal with complexity, the rewards include the potential for more pragmatic conclusions than alternative approaches to systematic reviewing. A separate publication will report the findings of the review.

    AB - BackgroundRealist synthesis is an increasingly popular approach to the review and synthesis of evidence, which focuses on understanding the mechanisms by which an intervention works (or not). There are few published examples of realist synthesis. This paper therefore fills a gap by describing, in detail, the process used for a realist review and synthesis to answer the question 'what interventions and strategies are effective in enabling evidence-informed healthcare?' The strengths and challenges of conducting realist review are also considered. MethodsThe realist approach involves identifying underlying causal mechanisms and exploring how they work under what conditions. The stages of this review included: defining the scope of the review (concept mining and framework formulation); searching for and scrutinising the evidence; extracting and synthesising the evidence; and developing the narrative, including hypotheses. ResultsBased on key terms and concepts related to various interventions to promote evidenceinformed healthcare, we developed an outcome-focused theoretical framework. Questions were tailored for each of four theory/intervention areas within the theoretical framework and were used to guide development of a review and data extraction process. The search for literature within our first theory area, change agency, was executed and the screening procedure resulted in inclusion of 52 papers. Using the questions relevant to this theory area, data were extracted by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. Synthesis involved organisation of extracted data into evidence tables, theming and formulation of chains of inference, linking between the chains of inference, and hypothesis formulation. The narrative was developed around the hypotheses generated within the change agency theory area. ConclusionsRealist synthesis lends itself to the review of complex interventions because it accounts for context as well as outcomes in the process of systematically and transparently synthesising relevant literature. While realist synthesis demands flexible thinking and the ability to deal with complexity, the rewards include the potential for more pragmatic conclusions than alternative approaches to systematic reviewing. A separate publication will report the findings of the review.

    U2 - 10.1186/1748-5908-7-33

    DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-7-33

    M3 - Article

    VL - 7

    JO - Implementation Science

    T2 - Implementation Science

    JF - Implementation Science

    SN - 1748-5908

    IS - 33

    ER -

    Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson AM, DeCorby K, Bucknall TK, Kent B et al. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research Implementation Science. Implementation Science. 2012 Apr 19;7(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-33