Randomized controlled trial of a brief versus extended Internet intervention for problem drinkers

JA Cunningham, Gillian W. Shorter, M Murphy, V Kushnir, J Rehm, CS Hendershot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AbstractPurpose Brief Internet interventions have been shown toreduce alcohol consumption. This trial intended to comparethe effects of one such brief intervention to an extendedInternet intervention for problem drinkers.Method Using online advertising, 490 participants, 18 yearsor older, were recruited and randomized to receive abrief (CheckYourDrinking.net) versus an extended(AlcoholHelpCentre.net) Internet intervention and werefollowed up at 6, 12, and 24 months. The per protocolprimary analysis assessed difference between condition atthe 12-month follow-up.Results The follow-up rate at 12 months was 83.3 %.ANCOVAs of the primary (Alcohol Use Disorder IdentificationTest (AUDIT)-C) and secondary outcome variables (drinks in atypical week, highest number of drinks on one occasion—baselinedrinking as covariate) revealed no significant (p > 0.05) differencesbetween the interventions. Similarly, combined analysesof the 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up revealed no significantdifferences between interventions at all time points.Conclusion The present study does not provide support forthe added benefit of an extended Internet intervention forproblem drinkers over a brief Internet intervention.
LanguageEnglish
Pages760–767
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Volume24
Issue number5
Early online date21 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Internet
Randomized Controlled Trials
Alcohol Drinking
Alcohols

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • Internet intervention
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • RCT
  • Problem drinking

Cite this

Cunningham, JA ; Shorter, Gillian W. ; Murphy, M ; Kushnir, V ; Rehm, J ; Hendershot, CS. / Randomized controlled trial of a brief versus extended Internet intervention for problem drinkers. In: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 760–767.
@article{0f7cf7bd10234f88a1ea79b43b7a0ef1,
title = "Randomized controlled trial of a brief versus extended Internet intervention for problem drinkers",
abstract = "AbstractPurpose Brief Internet interventions have been shown toreduce alcohol consumption. This trial intended to comparethe effects of one such brief intervention to an extendedInternet intervention for problem drinkers.Method Using online advertising, 490 participants, 18 yearsor older, were recruited and randomized to receive abrief (CheckYourDrinking.net) versus an extended(AlcoholHelpCentre.net) Internet intervention and werefollowed up at 6, 12, and 24 months. The per protocolprimary analysis assessed difference between condition atthe 12-month follow-up.Results The follow-up rate at 12 months was 83.3 {\%}.ANCOVAs of the primary (Alcohol Use Disorder IdentificationTest (AUDIT)-C) and secondary outcome variables (drinks in atypical week, highest number of drinks on one occasion—baselinedrinking as covariate) revealed no significant (p > 0.05) differencesbetween the interventions. Similarly, combined analysesof the 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up revealed no significantdifferences between interventions at all time points.Conclusion The present study does not provide support forthe added benefit of an extended Internet intervention forproblem drinkers over a brief Internet intervention.",
keywords = "Alcohol, Internet intervention, Randomized controlled trial, RCT, Problem drinking",
author = "JA Cunningham and Shorter, {Gillian W.} and M Murphy and V Kushnir and J Rehm and CS Hendershot",
note = "This is an open access article",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1007/s12529-016-9604-5",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "760–767",
journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "1070-5503",
number = "5",

}

Randomized controlled trial of a brief versus extended Internet intervention for problem drinkers. / Cunningham, JA; Shorter, Gillian W.; Murphy, M; Kushnir, V; Rehm, J; Hendershot, CS.

In: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 5, 21.10.2016, p. 760–767.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized controlled trial of a brief versus extended Internet intervention for problem drinkers

AU - Cunningham, JA

AU - Shorter, Gillian W.

AU - Murphy, M

AU - Kushnir, V

AU - Rehm, J

AU - Hendershot, CS

N1 - This is an open access article

PY - 2016/10/21

Y1 - 2016/10/21

N2 - AbstractPurpose Brief Internet interventions have been shown toreduce alcohol consumption. This trial intended to comparethe effects of one such brief intervention to an extendedInternet intervention for problem drinkers.Method Using online advertising, 490 participants, 18 yearsor older, were recruited and randomized to receive abrief (CheckYourDrinking.net) versus an extended(AlcoholHelpCentre.net) Internet intervention and werefollowed up at 6, 12, and 24 months. The per protocolprimary analysis assessed difference between condition atthe 12-month follow-up.Results The follow-up rate at 12 months was 83.3 %.ANCOVAs of the primary (Alcohol Use Disorder IdentificationTest (AUDIT)-C) and secondary outcome variables (drinks in atypical week, highest number of drinks on one occasion—baselinedrinking as covariate) revealed no significant (p > 0.05) differencesbetween the interventions. Similarly, combined analysesof the 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up revealed no significantdifferences between interventions at all time points.Conclusion The present study does not provide support forthe added benefit of an extended Internet intervention forproblem drinkers over a brief Internet intervention.

AB - AbstractPurpose Brief Internet interventions have been shown toreduce alcohol consumption. This trial intended to comparethe effects of one such brief intervention to an extendedInternet intervention for problem drinkers.Method Using online advertising, 490 participants, 18 yearsor older, were recruited and randomized to receive abrief (CheckYourDrinking.net) versus an extended(AlcoholHelpCentre.net) Internet intervention and werefollowed up at 6, 12, and 24 months. The per protocolprimary analysis assessed difference between condition atthe 12-month follow-up.Results The follow-up rate at 12 months was 83.3 %.ANCOVAs of the primary (Alcohol Use Disorder IdentificationTest (AUDIT)-C) and secondary outcome variables (drinks in atypical week, highest number of drinks on one occasion—baselinedrinking as covariate) revealed no significant (p > 0.05) differencesbetween the interventions. Similarly, combined analysesof the 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up revealed no significantdifferences between interventions at all time points.Conclusion The present study does not provide support forthe added benefit of an extended Internet intervention forproblem drinkers over a brief Internet intervention.

KW - Alcohol

KW - Internet intervention

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - RCT

KW - Problem drinking

U2 - 10.1007/s12529-016-9604-5

DO - 10.1007/s12529-016-9604-5

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 760

EP - 767

JO - International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

T2 - International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

JF - International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

SN - 1070-5503

IS - 5

ER -