Quality, risk and governance: social workers’ perspectives

Brian J Taylor, Barbara Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose – Governance is an emerging aspect of social care organisations embodyingprofessionally-led risk management, quality assurance and service improvement. The purpose ofthis paper is to put forward a broad conceptualisation of the main dimensions of quality and risk insocial care.Design/methodology/approach – A survey was undertaken to seek the perspectives on social caregovernance (SCG) of social workers in the South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust in NorthernIreland where clinical and SCG is formalised in the integrated health and social care service.Findings – The 123 respondents were from a wide range of grades, aspects of work (practice,management and training) and both children’s and adult services. Approximately, 60 per cent of social workers thought themselves knowledgeable on SCG, but this self-reported knowledge wasconsiderably higher amongst managers and trainers than practitioners. The risk register was familiar to 61 per cent of respondents. Social workers thought that useful ways to learn about SCG were team meetings, local workshops and engagement in developmental projects rather than training events.Research limitations/implications – The 41 per cent response rate is typical of surveys of busyprofessionals.Practical implications – Social workers were generally not very aware of the systems beingdeveloped to implement accountability and support through SCG, presenting challenges to the tasks of managing risk and improving the safety and quality of services.Originality/value – The paper shows that Northern Ireland is pioneering the development of SCG inparallel with clinical governance in health care. Valuable lessons are being learned about theapplication of concepts of risk and quality in the complexity of social work.Keywords Northern Ireland, Social services, Social workers, Governance, Leadership, Quality, Risk, Social care governancePaper type Research paper
LanguageEnglish
Pages256-272
JournalInternational Journal of Leadership in Public Services
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Governance
Social workers
Social care
Healthcare
Northern Ireland
Key words
Risk management
Service improvement
Design methodology
Quality of service
Social work
Work practices
Integrated
Accountability
Quality assurance
Conceptualization
Managers
Safety
Social services
Pioneering

Keywords

  • Governance
  • Leadership
  • Northern Ireland
  • Quality
  • Risk
  • Social Care
  • Social Services
  • Social Workers.

Cite this

@article{fd6c0d075d68486dafb356a0a09f03b8,
title = "Quality, risk and governance: social workers’ perspectives",
abstract = "Purpose – Governance is an emerging aspect of social care organisations embodyingprofessionally-led risk management, quality assurance and service improvement. The purpose ofthis paper is to put forward a broad conceptualisation of the main dimensions of quality and risk insocial care.Design/methodology/approach – A survey was undertaken to seek the perspectives on social caregovernance (SCG) of social workers in the South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust in NorthernIreland where clinical and SCG is formalised in the integrated health and social care service.Findings – The 123 respondents were from a wide range of grades, aspects of work (practice,management and training) and both children’s and adult services. Approximately, 60 per cent of social workers thought themselves knowledgeable on SCG, but this self-reported knowledge wasconsiderably higher amongst managers and trainers than practitioners. The risk register was familiar to 61 per cent of respondents. Social workers thought that useful ways to learn about SCG were team meetings, local workshops and engagement in developmental projects rather than training events.Research limitations/implications – The 41 per cent response rate is typical of surveys of busyprofessionals.Practical implications – Social workers were generally not very aware of the systems beingdeveloped to implement accountability and support through SCG, presenting challenges to the tasks of managing risk and improving the safety and quality of services.Originality/value – The paper shows that Northern Ireland is pioneering the development of SCG inparallel with clinical governance in health care. Valuable lessons are being learned about theapplication of concepts of risk and quality in the complexity of social work.Keywords Northern Ireland, Social services, Social workers, Governance, Leadership, Quality, Risk, Social care governancePaper type Research paper",
keywords = "Governance, Leadership, Northern Ireland, Quality, Risk, Social Care, Social Services, Social Workers.",
author = "Taylor, {Brian J} and Barbara Campbell",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1108/17479881111194152",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "256--272",
journal = "International Journal of Leadership in Public Services",
issn = "1747-9886",
number = "4",

}

Quality, risk and governance: social workers’ perspectives. / Taylor, Brian J; Campbell, Barbara.

In: International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, Vol. 7, No. 4, 25.12.2011, p. 256-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality, risk and governance: social workers’ perspectives

AU - Taylor, Brian J

AU - Campbell, Barbara

PY - 2011/12/25

Y1 - 2011/12/25

N2 - Purpose – Governance is an emerging aspect of social care organisations embodyingprofessionally-led risk management, quality assurance and service improvement. The purpose ofthis paper is to put forward a broad conceptualisation of the main dimensions of quality and risk insocial care.Design/methodology/approach – A survey was undertaken to seek the perspectives on social caregovernance (SCG) of social workers in the South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust in NorthernIreland where clinical and SCG is formalised in the integrated health and social care service.Findings – The 123 respondents were from a wide range of grades, aspects of work (practice,management and training) and both children’s and adult services. Approximately, 60 per cent of social workers thought themselves knowledgeable on SCG, but this self-reported knowledge wasconsiderably higher amongst managers and trainers than practitioners. The risk register was familiar to 61 per cent of respondents. Social workers thought that useful ways to learn about SCG were team meetings, local workshops and engagement in developmental projects rather than training events.Research limitations/implications – The 41 per cent response rate is typical of surveys of busyprofessionals.Practical implications – Social workers were generally not very aware of the systems beingdeveloped to implement accountability and support through SCG, presenting challenges to the tasks of managing risk and improving the safety and quality of services.Originality/value – The paper shows that Northern Ireland is pioneering the development of SCG inparallel with clinical governance in health care. Valuable lessons are being learned about theapplication of concepts of risk and quality in the complexity of social work.Keywords Northern Ireland, Social services, Social workers, Governance, Leadership, Quality, Risk, Social care governancePaper type Research paper

AB - Purpose – Governance is an emerging aspect of social care organisations embodyingprofessionally-led risk management, quality assurance and service improvement. The purpose ofthis paper is to put forward a broad conceptualisation of the main dimensions of quality and risk insocial care.Design/methodology/approach – A survey was undertaken to seek the perspectives on social caregovernance (SCG) of social workers in the South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust in NorthernIreland where clinical and SCG is formalised in the integrated health and social care service.Findings – The 123 respondents were from a wide range of grades, aspects of work (practice,management and training) and both children’s and adult services. Approximately, 60 per cent of social workers thought themselves knowledgeable on SCG, but this self-reported knowledge wasconsiderably higher amongst managers and trainers than practitioners. The risk register was familiar to 61 per cent of respondents. Social workers thought that useful ways to learn about SCG were team meetings, local workshops and engagement in developmental projects rather than training events.Research limitations/implications – The 41 per cent response rate is typical of surveys of busyprofessionals.Practical implications – Social workers were generally not very aware of the systems beingdeveloped to implement accountability and support through SCG, presenting challenges to the tasks of managing risk and improving the safety and quality of services.Originality/value – The paper shows that Northern Ireland is pioneering the development of SCG inparallel with clinical governance in health care. Valuable lessons are being learned about theapplication of concepts of risk and quality in the complexity of social work.Keywords Northern Ireland, Social services, Social workers, Governance, Leadership, Quality, Risk, Social care governancePaper type Research paper

KW - Governance

KW - Leadership

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - Quality

KW - Risk

KW - Social Care

KW - Social Services

KW - Social Workers.

U2 - 10.1108/17479881111194152

DO - 10.1108/17479881111194152

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 256

EP - 272

JO - International Journal of Leadership in Public Services

T2 - International Journal of Leadership in Public Services

JF - International Journal of Leadership in Public Services

SN - 1747-9886

IS - 4

ER -