PUBLIC INTENTIONS FOR PRIVATE SPACES: Exploring Architects’ Tactics to Shape Shared Space in Private-led Development

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

From the late 20th into the 21st centuries, the private market increasingly gained control from public authorities over strategic decisions affecting the quality of, and accessibility to, new urban development. This paper investigates how architects can adopt practice strategies to promote greater open-ness and use-value for the public domain in private-led development, rather than more objectified and controlled exchange-value approaches. The paper analyses two London-based residential case studies and interviews with the architects. It evaluates and compares perceptions of, and tactics to engage with, private-led development decision-making processes. It compares the individual practitioner’s experiences of architecture practice with explicit intentions to influence better quality shared city space, examining professional norms vis-à-vis commercial clients and wider society. The paper concludes that greater awareness of architects’ knowledge, skills, and a range of tactics to influence future shared environments can contribute to improved professional practice frameworks for more effective engagement in an increasingly globalised and privatised urban society.
LanguageEnglish
Pages170-183
JournalArchnet - IJAR
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2015

Fingerprint

urban society
twenty first century
architect
accessibility
tactics
urban development
Lead
decision making
market
Decision making
public authorities
decision-making process
Values
interview
decision
public domain
norm
city
society
public

Keywords

  • Private-led development
  • shared residential environments
  • shared space
  • architecture
  • critical practice

Cite this

@article{d06d47d1f46f42848289ef90541bc888,
title = "PUBLIC INTENTIONS FOR PRIVATE SPACES: Exploring Architects’ Tactics to Shape Shared Space in Private-led Development",
abstract = "From the late 20th into the 21st centuries, the private market increasingly gained control from public authorities over strategic decisions affecting the quality of, and accessibility to, new urban development. This paper investigates how architects can adopt practice strategies to promote greater open-ness and use-value for the public domain in private-led development, rather than more objectified and controlled exchange-value approaches. The paper analyses two London-based residential case studies and interviews with the architects. It evaluates and compares perceptions of, and tactics to engage with, private-led development decision-making processes. It compares the individual practitioner’s experiences of architecture practice with explicit intentions to influence better quality shared city space, examining professional norms vis-{\`a}-vis commercial clients and wider society. The paper concludes that greater awareness of architects’ knowledge, skills, and a range of tactics to influence future shared environments can contribute to improved professional practice frameworks for more effective engagement in an increasingly globalised and privatised urban society.",
keywords = "Private-led development, shared residential environments, shared space, architecture, critical practice",
author = "Saul Golden and Ian Montgomery and T.M Rikala",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
doi = "10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i2.644",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "170--183",
journal = "Archnet - IJAR",
issn = "1938-7806",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PUBLIC INTENTIONS FOR PRIVATE SPACES: Exploring Architects’ Tactics to Shape Shared Space in Private-led Development

AU - Golden, Saul

AU - Montgomery, Ian

AU - Rikala, T.M

PY - 2015/7

Y1 - 2015/7

N2 - From the late 20th into the 21st centuries, the private market increasingly gained control from public authorities over strategic decisions affecting the quality of, and accessibility to, new urban development. This paper investigates how architects can adopt practice strategies to promote greater open-ness and use-value for the public domain in private-led development, rather than more objectified and controlled exchange-value approaches. The paper analyses two London-based residential case studies and interviews with the architects. It evaluates and compares perceptions of, and tactics to engage with, private-led development decision-making processes. It compares the individual practitioner’s experiences of architecture practice with explicit intentions to influence better quality shared city space, examining professional norms vis-à-vis commercial clients and wider society. The paper concludes that greater awareness of architects’ knowledge, skills, and a range of tactics to influence future shared environments can contribute to improved professional practice frameworks for more effective engagement in an increasingly globalised and privatised urban society.

AB - From the late 20th into the 21st centuries, the private market increasingly gained control from public authorities over strategic decisions affecting the quality of, and accessibility to, new urban development. This paper investigates how architects can adopt practice strategies to promote greater open-ness and use-value for the public domain in private-led development, rather than more objectified and controlled exchange-value approaches. The paper analyses two London-based residential case studies and interviews with the architects. It evaluates and compares perceptions of, and tactics to engage with, private-led development decision-making processes. It compares the individual practitioner’s experiences of architecture practice with explicit intentions to influence better quality shared city space, examining professional norms vis-à-vis commercial clients and wider society. The paper concludes that greater awareness of architects’ knowledge, skills, and a range of tactics to influence future shared environments can contribute to improved professional practice frameworks for more effective engagement in an increasingly globalised and privatised urban society.

KW - Private-led development

KW - shared residential environments

KW - shared space

KW - architecture

KW - critical practice

UR - http://archnet-ijar.net/index.php/IJAR

U2 - 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i2.644

DO - 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i2.644

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 170

EP - 183

JO - Archnet - IJAR

T2 - Archnet - IJAR

JF - Archnet - IJAR

SN - 1938-7806

IS - 2

ER -