Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Psychometric properties of the Mental Toughness Questionnaire 48 (MTQ48) in elite, amateur and nonathletes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Mental Toughness Questionnaire 48 (MTQ48) and assess the measurement invariance across elite, amateur, and nonathletes. In total, 1,096 participants aged between 18 and 58 years with a range of athletic experience—elite (n = 181), amateur (n = 577) and nonathletes (n = 338)—from various sports completed the MTQ48. The internal consistency of the scale was gauged through Omega for the total and relevant subscales. Factorial validity was assessed using exploratory structural equation modeling to provide a comprehensive estimation of the scales dimensionality. Overall, results offered support for the scales reliability with acceptable internal consistency reported at the total and subscale level. However, the validity of the MTQ48 for use with athletes of different levels may be questioned. The MTQ48’s hypothesized that the 4-factor model did not fit the data well, whereas the 6-factor model produced acceptable levels of fit with large degrees of misspecification in the factor structures across elite, amateur, and nonathletes. The results caution the use of the scale with elite athletes, and call for refinement of the measure at the subscale level. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)128-140
Number of pages13
JournalSport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 1 May 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychometric properties of the Mental Toughness Questionnaire 48 (MTQ48) in elite, amateur and nonathletes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this