Abstract
In 2013, the Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women adopted its landmark General Recommendation No. 30 on the rights of women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations.1 The General Recommendation was significant for several reasons, not least because – for the first time – it brought the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Committee into direct conversation with the Women, Peace and Security agenda (WPS) of the UN Security Council. Writing in 20152 and in 2018,3 we identified the pursuit of synergies between CEDAW and WPS as a unique and important new opportunity to redress several of the identified shortcomings of the WPS agenda as defined and implemented by the UN Security Council. Principally, we identified these as, first, to enhance state accountability for the WPS agenda; second, to refocus WPS on women’s equality and rights, and to challenge narrower and more securitised definitions of women’s rights in the WPS agenda; and finally, to offer broader and more meaningful opportunities for civil society participation in influencing and implementing the WPS agenda.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | London |
| Publisher | London School of Economics and Political Science |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 14 Dec 2020 |
Publication series
| Name | Centre for Women, Peace and Security Working Paper Series |
|---|
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Keywords
- conflict
- CEDAW
- Women, Peace and Security
- United Nations Security Council
- international law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Protecting Women's Rights in Conflict: New Developments and Next Steps in the Synergy Between CEDAW and the WPS Agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver