TY - UNPB
T1 - Protecting Women's Rights in Conflict: New Developments and Next Steps in the Synergy Between CEDAW and the WPS Agenda
AU - O'Rourke, Catherine
AU - Swaine, Aisling
PY - 2020/12/14
Y1 - 2020/12/14
N2 - In 2013, the Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women adopted its landmark General Recommendation No. 30 on the rights of women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations.1 The General Recommendation was significant for several reasons, not least because – for the first time – it brought the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Committee into direct conversation with the Women, Peace and Security agenda (WPS) of the UN Security Council. Writing in 20152 and in 2018,3 we identified the pursuit of synergies between CEDAW and WPS as a unique and important new opportunity to redress several of the identified shortcomings of the WPS agenda as defined and implemented by the UN Security Council. Principally, we identified these as, first, to enhance state accountability for the WPS agenda; second, to refocus WPS on women’s equality and rights, and to challenge narrower and more securitised definitions of women’s rights in the WPS agenda; and finally, to offer broader and more meaningful opportunities for civil society participation in influencing and implementing the WPS agenda.
AB - In 2013, the Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women adopted its landmark General Recommendation No. 30 on the rights of women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations.1 The General Recommendation was significant for several reasons, not least because – for the first time – it brought the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Committee into direct conversation with the Women, Peace and Security agenda (WPS) of the UN Security Council. Writing in 20152 and in 2018,3 we identified the pursuit of synergies between CEDAW and WPS as a unique and important new opportunity to redress several of the identified shortcomings of the WPS agenda as defined and implemented by the UN Security Council. Principally, we identified these as, first, to enhance state accountability for the WPS agenda; second, to refocus WPS on women’s equality and rights, and to challenge narrower and more securitised definitions of women’s rights in the WPS agenda; and finally, to offer broader and more meaningful opportunities for civil society participation in influencing and implementing the WPS agenda.
KW - conflict
KW - CEDAW
KW - Women, Peace and Security
KW - United Nations Security Council
KW - international law
UR - https://www.lse.ac.uk/women-peace-security/assets/documents/2020/WPS26ORourkeSwaine.pdf
M3 - Working paper
T3 - Centre for Women, Peace and Security Working Paper Series
BT - Protecting Women's Rights in Conflict: New Developments and Next Steps in the Synergy Between CEDAW and the WPS Agenda
PB - London School of Economics and Political Science
CY - London
ER -