Abstract
The relations between prosocial risk taking (taking a risk to benefit another person; PSRT) and interpersonal regret (regret that one's choices have caused a poor outcome for another person) were examined in 192 children aged 7–9. PSRT was measured by children's choices within a gambling task in which one choice guaranteed participants a good prize whereas the other involved risking this prize to help a peer also win a good prize. Interpersonal regret was assessed within the same task by examining children's change in emotion when they learned they would have won a better prize for a peer had they chosen differently. Performance on this task was also examined in relation to sympathy and resource sharing. Findings indicated that the operationalizations of PSRT and interpersonal regret were meaningful. Children who took a prosocial risk were more generous in a resource sharing task. In some circumstances, children who took a prosocial risk were also more likely to experience interpersonal regret than those who did not take a prosocial risk, indicating that experiencing interpersonal regret may be related to individual differences in prosociality. However, experiencing interpersonal regret did not have a direct effect on subsequent prosocial behavior, when measured by resource sharing. We consider findings in relation to a possible distinction between outcome and process regret and the generalizability of the behavioral consequences of regret.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 171-187 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Social Development |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 17 Jan 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 28 Feb 2023 |
Bibliographical note
© 2022 The Authors. Social Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Data Access Statement
The data is available upon request from the corresponding author.Funding
This research was funded by a PhD studentship from the Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland; there are no conflicts of interest to declare. Ethical approval was granted by Queen's University Belfast. Data is available upon request by contacting the first author.
Keywords
- Counterfactuals
- prosocial behavior
- regret
- risk taking