Professional Judgement about Reoffending: Factorial survey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Summary: Social workers in criminal justice provide reports to courts, including assessments of the likelihood of re-offending, which are used to assist in judicial decisions. This study used a factorial survey with 93 social workers employed as probation officers to measure factors influencing their judgement of the risk of re-offending. Findings: Analysis using regression and analysis of variance showed that judgements about the likelihood of re-offending were influenced by dynamic factors (such as substance misuse, support networks, level of responsibility taken for offending behaviour and cooperation with probation supervision) as well as more widely tested static risk factors (such as previous convictions and age). Application: This study highlights a range of dynamic factors that might inform review of criminal justice social work assessment tools which typically incorporate the better-tested static factors. The findings will contribute to current thinking in social work education which is starting to address issues of risk and decision making more explicitly in the curriculum at both qualifying and post-qualifying stages. The more nuanced assessment of factors considered by experienced criminal justice social workers will complement the evidence from more strongly evidenced static risk factors to inform teaching about professional judgements. As we seek to incorporate statistical knowledge into the human processes of social work assessment, Brunskwik’s Lens Model and other psycho-social rationality models – which bridge between analytic and descriptive models of human judgement – may be useful conceptualisations of the professional judgement process in social work.

LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of Social Work
Early online date13 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 May 2019

Fingerprint

Social Work
social work
Criminal Law
social worker
justice
previous conviction
probation officer
probation
analysis of variance
rationality
supervision
regression analysis
Curriculum
Lenses
Decision Making
Analysis of Variance
Teaching
decision making
curriculum
responsibility

Keywords

  • criminal justice
  • Decision making
  • professional judgement
  • psycho-social rationality
  • risk
  • social work
  • assessment
  • risk assessment
  • Social work
  • decision making

Cite this

@article{3d280de128864c9680b2e3949f590526,
title = "Professional Judgement about Reoffending: Factorial survey",
abstract = "Summary: Social workers in criminal justice provide reports to courts, including assessments of the likelihood of re-offending, which are used to assist in judicial decisions. This study used a factorial survey with 93 social workers employed as probation officers to measure factors influencing their judgement of the risk of re-offending. Findings: Analysis using regression and analysis of variance showed that judgements about the likelihood of re-offending were influenced by dynamic factors (such as substance misuse, support networks, level of responsibility taken for offending behaviour and cooperation with probation supervision) as well as more widely tested static risk factors (such as previous convictions and age). Application: This study highlights a range of dynamic factors that might inform review of criminal justice social work assessment tools which typically incorporate the better-tested static factors. The findings will contribute to current thinking in social work education which is starting to address issues of risk and decision making more explicitly in the curriculum at both qualifying and post-qualifying stages. The more nuanced assessment of factors considered by experienced criminal justice social workers will complement the evidence from more strongly evidenced static risk factors to inform teaching about professional judgements. As we seek to incorporate statistical knowledge into the human processes of social work assessment, Brunskwik’s Lens Model and other psycho-social rationality models – which bridge between analytic and descriptive models of human judgement – may be useful conceptualisations of the professional judgement process in social work.",
keywords = "criminal justice, Decision making, professional judgement, psycho-social rationality, risk, social work, assessment, risk assessment, Social work, decision making",
author = "Judith Mullineux and Brian Taylor and Melanie Giles",
note = "Article was uploaded at time of deposit with an embargo as it had not been published yet. It was listing as REF OA Non Compliant - couldn't figure out why. Marie Mallon lifted the embargo on the manuscript on 7 July and set the exception of deposited within 3 months of publication.",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1177/1468017319848889",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Social Work",
issn = "1468-0173",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professional Judgement about Reoffending: Factorial survey

AU - Mullineux, Judith

AU - Taylor, Brian

AU - Giles, Melanie

N1 - Article was uploaded at time of deposit with an embargo as it had not been published yet. It was listing as REF OA Non Compliant - couldn't figure out why. Marie Mallon lifted the embargo on the manuscript on 7 July and set the exception of deposited within 3 months of publication.

PY - 2019/5/13

Y1 - 2019/5/13

N2 - Summary: Social workers in criminal justice provide reports to courts, including assessments of the likelihood of re-offending, which are used to assist in judicial decisions. This study used a factorial survey with 93 social workers employed as probation officers to measure factors influencing their judgement of the risk of re-offending. Findings: Analysis using regression and analysis of variance showed that judgements about the likelihood of re-offending were influenced by dynamic factors (such as substance misuse, support networks, level of responsibility taken for offending behaviour and cooperation with probation supervision) as well as more widely tested static risk factors (such as previous convictions and age). Application: This study highlights a range of dynamic factors that might inform review of criminal justice social work assessment tools which typically incorporate the better-tested static factors. The findings will contribute to current thinking in social work education which is starting to address issues of risk and decision making more explicitly in the curriculum at both qualifying and post-qualifying stages. The more nuanced assessment of factors considered by experienced criminal justice social workers will complement the evidence from more strongly evidenced static risk factors to inform teaching about professional judgements. As we seek to incorporate statistical knowledge into the human processes of social work assessment, Brunskwik’s Lens Model and other psycho-social rationality models – which bridge between analytic and descriptive models of human judgement – may be useful conceptualisations of the professional judgement process in social work.

AB - Summary: Social workers in criminal justice provide reports to courts, including assessments of the likelihood of re-offending, which are used to assist in judicial decisions. This study used a factorial survey with 93 social workers employed as probation officers to measure factors influencing their judgement of the risk of re-offending. Findings: Analysis using regression and analysis of variance showed that judgements about the likelihood of re-offending were influenced by dynamic factors (such as substance misuse, support networks, level of responsibility taken for offending behaviour and cooperation with probation supervision) as well as more widely tested static risk factors (such as previous convictions and age). Application: This study highlights a range of dynamic factors that might inform review of criminal justice social work assessment tools which typically incorporate the better-tested static factors. The findings will contribute to current thinking in social work education which is starting to address issues of risk and decision making more explicitly in the curriculum at both qualifying and post-qualifying stages. The more nuanced assessment of factors considered by experienced criminal justice social workers will complement the evidence from more strongly evidenced static risk factors to inform teaching about professional judgements. As we seek to incorporate statistical knowledge into the human processes of social work assessment, Brunskwik’s Lens Model and other psycho-social rationality models – which bridge between analytic and descriptive models of human judgement – may be useful conceptualisations of the professional judgement process in social work.

KW - criminal justice

KW - Decision making

KW - professional judgement

KW - psycho-social rationality

KW - risk

KW - social work

KW - assessment

KW - risk assessment

KW - Social work

KW - decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067639704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1468017319848889

DO - 10.1177/1468017319848889

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Social Work

T2 - Journal of Social Work

JF - Journal of Social Work

SN - 1468-0173

ER -