Professional golf coaches' perceptions of the key technical parameters in the golf swing

Aimée Smith, Jonathan Roberts, Eric S Wallace, Stephanie Forrester

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessing a coach’s technical knowledge of a sporting technique can reveal measureable biomechanical parameters associated with successful performance. This assessment can provide new insights into technique, enhance a coach’s technical knowledge or assist in optimising performance. Despite numerous golf instructional books, no scientific study has assessed a golf coach’s technical knowledge of the golf swing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was toidentify the key technical parameters that professional golf coaches associate with a top level golf swing; with the intention of using the results to guide future golf biomechanics research and coaching technologies. Initially, sixteen professional golf coaches were individually observed coaching a highly skilled golfer after which they participated in a semi-structured interview regarding their technical analysis of the golf swing. QSR-NVivo analysis software was used to inductively analyse the data using the grounded theory approach. Line-by-line coding was followed by comparison of ‘meaning units’ to form a coding hierarchy with several key technical parameters identified. A successful golf swing was defined through three elements, with “body motion” affecting “club motion” and resulting “ball flight”. Several terms described these parameters including “consistent”, “powerful”, “accurate”, “simple” and “controlled” with the most prevalent being “repeatable”. “Body motion” was influenced by five intrinsically linked key technical parameters: “posture”, “body rotation”, “sequential movement”, “hand and arm action” and “clubparameters” which were further sub categorised. To conclude, the key technical parameters have been identified which will be used to support future biomechanical research in this area and to be used to direct new technologies to aid golf coaching.
LanguageEnglish
Pages224-229
JournalProcedia Engineering
Volume34
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Biomechanics

Keywords

  • Golf swing
  • coaching
  • qualitative analysis
  • technical parameter
  • biomechanics

Cite this

Smith, Aimée ; Roberts, Jonathan ; Wallace, Eric S ; Forrester, Stephanie. / Professional golf coaches' perceptions of the key technical parameters in the golf swing. 2012 ; Vol. 34. pp. 224-229.
@article{1a0cd55f0f994caf9f3bf2e1ff32e42c,
title = "Professional golf coaches' perceptions of the key technical parameters in the golf swing",
abstract = "Assessing a coach’s technical knowledge of a sporting technique can reveal measureable biomechanical parameters associated with successful performance. This assessment can provide new insights into technique, enhance a coach’s technical knowledge or assist in optimising performance. Despite numerous golf instructional books, no scientific study has assessed a golf coach’s technical knowledge of the golf swing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was toidentify the key technical parameters that professional golf coaches associate with a top level golf swing; with the intention of using the results to guide future golf biomechanics research and coaching technologies. Initially, sixteen professional golf coaches were individually observed coaching a highly skilled golfer after which they participated in a semi-structured interview regarding their technical analysis of the golf swing. QSR-NVivo analysis software was used to inductively analyse the data using the grounded theory approach. Line-by-line coding was followed by comparison of ‘meaning units’ to form a coding hierarchy with several key technical parameters identified. A successful golf swing was defined through three elements, with “body motion” affecting “club motion” and resulting “ball flight”. Several terms described these parameters including “consistent”, “powerful”, “accurate”, “simple” and “controlled” with the most prevalent being “repeatable”. “Body motion” was influenced by five intrinsically linked key technical parameters: “posture”, “body rotation”, “sequential movement”, “hand and arm action” and “clubparameters” which were further sub categorised. To conclude, the key technical parameters have been identified which will be used to support future biomechanical research in this area and to be used to direct new technologies to aid golf coaching.",
keywords = "Golf swing, coaching, qualitative analysis, technical parameter, biomechanics",
author = "Aim{\'e}e Smith and Jonathan Roberts and Wallace, {Eric S} and Stephanie Forrester",
note = "Reference text: [1]Sherman, C.A., et al., Coaches' perceptions of golf swing kinematics. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2001. 32(3): p. 257-270. [2]Thompson, A., I.N. Bezodis, and R.L. Jones, An in-depth assessment of expert sprint coaches' technical knowledge. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2009. 27(8): p. 855-861. [3]Irwin, G., S. Hanton, and D.G. Kerwin, The conceptual process of skill progression development in artistic gymnastics. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2005. 23(10): p. 1089 - 1099. [4]Irwin, G. and D. Kerwin, Biomechanics for coaches, in An introduction to sports coaching, R.L. Jones, M. Hughes, and K. Kingston, Editors. 2007, Routledge: London. p. 87-100. [5]Schempp, P.G., et al., How the best get better: an analysis of the self-monitoring strategies used by expert golf instructors. Sport Education and Society, 2007. 12(2): p. 175-192. [6]Patton, M.Q., Qualitative research and evaluation methods 3rd ed. 2002, London: Sage. [7]Kvale, S., Doing Interviews. 2007, London: SAGE. [8]Jones, R., I. Bezodis, and A. Thompson, Coaching Sprinting: Expert Coaches' Perception of Race Phases and Technical Constructs. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2009. 4(3): p. 385-396. [9]Walker, D. and F. Myrick, Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 2006. 16(4): p. 547-559. [10]Corbin, J.M. and A.L. Strauss, Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2008: Sage Publications, Inc.",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.proeng.2012.04.039",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "224--229",

}

Professional golf coaches' perceptions of the key technical parameters in the golf swing. / Smith, Aimée; Roberts, Jonathan; Wallace, Eric S; Forrester, Stephanie.

Vol. 34, 02.03.2012, p. 224-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professional golf coaches' perceptions of the key technical parameters in the golf swing

AU - Smith, Aimée

AU - Roberts, Jonathan

AU - Wallace, Eric S

AU - Forrester, Stephanie

N1 - Reference text: [1]Sherman, C.A., et al., Coaches' perceptions of golf swing kinematics. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2001. 32(3): p. 257-270. [2]Thompson, A., I.N. Bezodis, and R.L. Jones, An in-depth assessment of expert sprint coaches' technical knowledge. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2009. 27(8): p. 855-861. [3]Irwin, G., S. Hanton, and D.G. Kerwin, The conceptual process of skill progression development in artistic gymnastics. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2005. 23(10): p. 1089 - 1099. [4]Irwin, G. and D. Kerwin, Biomechanics for coaches, in An introduction to sports coaching, R.L. Jones, M. Hughes, and K. Kingston, Editors. 2007, Routledge: London. p. 87-100. [5]Schempp, P.G., et al., How the best get better: an analysis of the self-monitoring strategies used by expert golf instructors. Sport Education and Society, 2007. 12(2): p. 175-192. [6]Patton, M.Q., Qualitative research and evaluation methods 3rd ed. 2002, London: Sage. [7]Kvale, S., Doing Interviews. 2007, London: SAGE. [8]Jones, R., I. Bezodis, and A. Thompson, Coaching Sprinting: Expert Coaches' Perception of Race Phases and Technical Constructs. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2009. 4(3): p. 385-396. [9]Walker, D. and F. Myrick, Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 2006. 16(4): p. 547-559. [10]Corbin, J.M. and A.L. Strauss, Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2008: Sage Publications, Inc.

PY - 2012/3/2

Y1 - 2012/3/2

N2 - Assessing a coach’s technical knowledge of a sporting technique can reveal measureable biomechanical parameters associated with successful performance. This assessment can provide new insights into technique, enhance a coach’s technical knowledge or assist in optimising performance. Despite numerous golf instructional books, no scientific study has assessed a golf coach’s technical knowledge of the golf swing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was toidentify the key technical parameters that professional golf coaches associate with a top level golf swing; with the intention of using the results to guide future golf biomechanics research and coaching technologies. Initially, sixteen professional golf coaches were individually observed coaching a highly skilled golfer after which they participated in a semi-structured interview regarding their technical analysis of the golf swing. QSR-NVivo analysis software was used to inductively analyse the data using the grounded theory approach. Line-by-line coding was followed by comparison of ‘meaning units’ to form a coding hierarchy with several key technical parameters identified. A successful golf swing was defined through three elements, with “body motion” affecting “club motion” and resulting “ball flight”. Several terms described these parameters including “consistent”, “powerful”, “accurate”, “simple” and “controlled” with the most prevalent being “repeatable”. “Body motion” was influenced by five intrinsically linked key technical parameters: “posture”, “body rotation”, “sequential movement”, “hand and arm action” and “clubparameters” which were further sub categorised. To conclude, the key technical parameters have been identified which will be used to support future biomechanical research in this area and to be used to direct new technologies to aid golf coaching.

AB - Assessing a coach’s technical knowledge of a sporting technique can reveal measureable biomechanical parameters associated with successful performance. This assessment can provide new insights into technique, enhance a coach’s technical knowledge or assist in optimising performance. Despite numerous golf instructional books, no scientific study has assessed a golf coach’s technical knowledge of the golf swing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was toidentify the key technical parameters that professional golf coaches associate with a top level golf swing; with the intention of using the results to guide future golf biomechanics research and coaching technologies. Initially, sixteen professional golf coaches were individually observed coaching a highly skilled golfer after which they participated in a semi-structured interview regarding their technical analysis of the golf swing. QSR-NVivo analysis software was used to inductively analyse the data using the grounded theory approach. Line-by-line coding was followed by comparison of ‘meaning units’ to form a coding hierarchy with several key technical parameters identified. A successful golf swing was defined through three elements, with “body motion” affecting “club motion” and resulting “ball flight”. Several terms described these parameters including “consistent”, “powerful”, “accurate”, “simple” and “controlled” with the most prevalent being “repeatable”. “Body motion” was influenced by five intrinsically linked key technical parameters: “posture”, “body rotation”, “sequential movement”, “hand and arm action” and “clubparameters” which were further sub categorised. To conclude, the key technical parameters have been identified which will be used to support future biomechanical research in this area and to be used to direct new technologies to aid golf coaching.

KW - Golf swing

KW - coaching

KW - qualitative analysis

KW - technical parameter

KW - biomechanics

U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.04.039

DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.04.039

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 224

EP - 229

ER -