Abstract
The paper examines the design and techno-economic risk assessment of a carbon capture and storage (CCS) process using silica-polyethyleneimine (Si-PEI) as a solid sorbent. This CCS process was integrated into a cement plant with an annual production of one million tonnes of clinker, representing the EU's average plant size. The study benchmarks the Si-PEI CCS process against the monoethanolamine (MEA) CCS process, assuming both systems capture 90 % of the plant's annual emissions. Aspen Plus models, validated through literature and experiments, simulated the CCS processes. A preliminary hazard analysis assessed technical risks, while economic risks were quantified using the Monte Carlo method, considering uncertainties in feedstock supply cost, cement selling price, solvent/sorbent cost, energy cost, and emission allowance price. The Si-PEI CCS unit emerged as the most favourable investment, being less expensive and technically safer than the MEA CCS unit due to its modular design and lower operating temperature. The economic advantage is attributed to the lower operation temperature (120 °C vs. 150 °C) and lower regeneration energy requirement (2.85 GJ/tonne CO2 vs. 4.25 GJ/tonne CO2). Maintaining a purge rate below 0.03 % is crucial for the solid sorbent's benefits over the MEA CCS process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 135482 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-11 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Energy |
| Volume | 322 |
| Issue number | 135482 |
| Early online date | 6 Mar 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 1 May 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
Data Access Statement
Data will be made available on request.Funding
This study was carried out within the ABSALT project, which was funded through the ACT program (Accelerating CCS Technologies, Horizon2020 Project No 327334) and DESNZ (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero).
Keywords
- Post-combustion CO2 capture
- Silica polyethyleneimine (Si-PEI) adsorption
- Monoethanolamine (MEA) absorption
- Aspen plus
- Preliminary hazard analysis
- Economic risk assessment
- Monte Carlo simulation
- Post-combustion CO capture