Abstract
The Groningen gas reservoir, situated in the northeast of the Netherlands, is western Europe’s largest producing gas field and has been in production since 1963. The gas production has induced both subsidence and seismicity. Seismicity is detected and located using the Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut shallow-borehole array for the period 2015–2017, incorporating the back projection techniques of QuakeMigrate and the nonlinear location procedure to constrain earthquake locations and depths. The uncertainties on the estimated depths are estimated taking into account velocity model, changes in station array geometry and uncertainties in the measurement of arrival times of the P and S waves. We show that the depth distribution of seismicity is consistent with nucleation within the reservoir (28 per cent) or in the overburden (60 per cent) within ∼500 m from the top of the reservoir. Earthquakes with hypocentres in the overburden likely originate from overlying Zechstein anhydrite caprock. Based on their depth distribution, it seems like the earthquakes are primarily driven by the elastic strain in the reservoir and overburden, induced by the reservoir compaction. We estimate the probability of earthquakes nucleating beneath the reservoir in the underlying Carboniferous limestone and basement, to be no more than 12 per cent.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 507-516 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Geophysical Journal International |
Volume | 222 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 26 Apr 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 1 Jul 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:J.S. was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC; Grant RG81432; Geomechanical Properties of the Groningen Reservoir) with CASE support from Shell Global Solutions International B.V. The data for this paper can be found in the Supporting Information. Waveform data were provided by Koninkljjk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut (http://www.knmi.nl/).We gratefully acknowledge data and support from Nederlandse Aardoli Maatschappij (Jan Van Elk, Gini Ketellar and Dirk Doornhof) and Shell Global Solutions (Stijn Bierman, Steve Oates, RickWentinck, Xander Campman, Alexander Droujinine and Chris Willacy).
Funding Information:
J.S. was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC; Grant RG81432; Geomechanical Properties of the Groningen Reservoir) with CASE support from Shell Global Solutions International B.V. The data for this paper can be found in the Supporting Information. Waveform data were provided by Koninkljjk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut (http://www.knmi.nl/). We gratefully acknowledge data and support from Nederlandse Aardoli Maatschappij (Jan Van Elk, Gini Ketel-lar and Dirk Doornhof) and Shell Global Solutions (Stijn Bierman, Steve Oates, Rick Wentinck, Xander Campman, Alexander Drouji-nine and Chris Willacy).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Earthquake hazards
- Earthquake source observations
- Induced seismicity