Predictors of upper limb spasticity after stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lisa Tedesco Tricas, Niamh Kennedy, Toby Smith, Valerie Pomeroy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the predictive markers for the occurrence of upper limb spasticity in the first 12 months after stroke. Data sources: A systematic review was undertaken of the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PEDRO to 31st December 2017. Study selection: Non-experimental or experimental studies that included a control group with spasticity who did not receive an experimental intervention which investigated at least one variable (explanatory variable) measured at baseline against the development (or not) of spasticity at a future time point within 12 months post stroke were selected independently by two reviewers. Eleven papers met the selection criteria. Study appraisal: Data were extracted into tabular format using predefined data fields by two reviewers. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Downs and Black tool. Data were analysed using a meta-analysis or narrative review. Results: Ten studies, including 856 participants were analysed. The predictive markers of upper limb spasticity at one month post stroke were: motor 11.25 (odds ratio, OR); [95% CI:2.48, 51.04] and sensory impairments 4.91 (OR); [1.24, 19.46]; haemorrhagic stroke 3.70 (OR); [1.05, 12.98] and age 0.01 (OR) [0.00, 69.89]. Only motor impairment was found as a significant predictor at six months post stroke 30.68 (OR); [1.60, 587.06]. Limitations: Low number of studies exploring biomechanical and neurophysiological in addition to behavioural predictors of spasticity were included. Conclusion and implications of key findings: Using the results, the identified predictive markers have potential to better inform clinical decision-making and to plan specific rehabilitation interventions by physiotherapists for stroke survivors with upper limb spasticity. Systematic Review Registration Number PROSPERO (ID: CRD42016027642).

LanguageEnglish
Pages163-173
Number of pages11
JournalPhysiotherapy
Volume105
Issue number2
Early online date11 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Upper Extremity
Meta-Analysis
Stroke
Odds Ratio
Information Storage and Retrieval
Physical Therapists
MEDLINE
Patient Selection
Rehabilitation
Databases
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Contracture
  • Muscle tone
  • Prediction
  • Rehabilitation
  • Stroke
  • Upper limb

Cite this

Tedesco Tricas, Lisa ; Kennedy, Niamh ; Smith, Toby ; Pomeroy, Valerie. / Predictors of upper limb spasticity after stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. 2019 ; Vol. 105, No. 2. pp. 163-173.
@article{2fe4e1cdab264148952131ea203dd1fb,
title = "Predictors of upper limb spasticity after stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the predictive markers for the occurrence of upper limb spasticity in the first 12 months after stroke. Data sources: A systematic review was undertaken of the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PEDRO to 31st December 2017. Study selection: Non-experimental or experimental studies that included a control group with spasticity who did not receive an experimental intervention which investigated at least one variable (explanatory variable) measured at baseline against the development (or not) of spasticity at a future time point within 12 months post stroke were selected independently by two reviewers. Eleven papers met the selection criteria. Study appraisal: Data were extracted into tabular format using predefined data fields by two reviewers. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Downs and Black tool. Data were analysed using a meta-analysis or narrative review. Results: Ten studies, including 856 participants were analysed. The predictive markers of upper limb spasticity at one month post stroke were: motor 11.25 (odds ratio, OR); [95{\%} CI:2.48, 51.04] and sensory impairments 4.91 (OR); [1.24, 19.46]; haemorrhagic stroke 3.70 (OR); [1.05, 12.98] and age 0.01 (OR) [0.00, 69.89]. Only motor impairment was found as a significant predictor at six months post stroke 30.68 (OR); [1.60, 587.06]. Limitations: Low number of studies exploring biomechanical and neurophysiological in addition to behavioural predictors of spasticity were included. Conclusion and implications of key findings: Using the results, the identified predictive markers have potential to better inform clinical decision-making and to plan specific rehabilitation interventions by physiotherapists for stroke survivors with upper limb spasticity. Systematic Review Registration Number PROSPERO (ID: CRD42016027642).",
keywords = "Contracture, Muscle tone, Prediction, Rehabilitation, Stroke, Upper limb",
author = "{Tedesco Tricas}, Lisa and Niamh Kennedy and Toby Smith and Valerie Pomeroy",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.physio.2019.01.004",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "163--173",
number = "2",

}

Predictors of upper limb spasticity after stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Tedesco Tricas, Lisa; Kennedy, Niamh; Smith, Toby; Pomeroy, Valerie.

Vol. 105, No. 2, 01.06.2019, p. 163-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of upper limb spasticity after stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Tedesco Tricas, Lisa

AU - Kennedy, Niamh

AU - Smith, Toby

AU - Pomeroy, Valerie

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Objective: To determine the predictive markers for the occurrence of upper limb spasticity in the first 12 months after stroke. Data sources: A systematic review was undertaken of the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PEDRO to 31st December 2017. Study selection: Non-experimental or experimental studies that included a control group with spasticity who did not receive an experimental intervention which investigated at least one variable (explanatory variable) measured at baseline against the development (or not) of spasticity at a future time point within 12 months post stroke were selected independently by two reviewers. Eleven papers met the selection criteria. Study appraisal: Data were extracted into tabular format using predefined data fields by two reviewers. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Downs and Black tool. Data were analysed using a meta-analysis or narrative review. Results: Ten studies, including 856 participants were analysed. The predictive markers of upper limb spasticity at one month post stroke were: motor 11.25 (odds ratio, OR); [95% CI:2.48, 51.04] and sensory impairments 4.91 (OR); [1.24, 19.46]; haemorrhagic stroke 3.70 (OR); [1.05, 12.98] and age 0.01 (OR) [0.00, 69.89]. Only motor impairment was found as a significant predictor at six months post stroke 30.68 (OR); [1.60, 587.06]. Limitations: Low number of studies exploring biomechanical and neurophysiological in addition to behavioural predictors of spasticity were included. Conclusion and implications of key findings: Using the results, the identified predictive markers have potential to better inform clinical decision-making and to plan specific rehabilitation interventions by physiotherapists for stroke survivors with upper limb spasticity. Systematic Review Registration Number PROSPERO (ID: CRD42016027642).

AB - Objective: To determine the predictive markers for the occurrence of upper limb spasticity in the first 12 months after stroke. Data sources: A systematic review was undertaken of the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PEDRO to 31st December 2017. Study selection: Non-experimental or experimental studies that included a control group with spasticity who did not receive an experimental intervention which investigated at least one variable (explanatory variable) measured at baseline against the development (or not) of spasticity at a future time point within 12 months post stroke were selected independently by two reviewers. Eleven papers met the selection criteria. Study appraisal: Data were extracted into tabular format using predefined data fields by two reviewers. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Downs and Black tool. Data were analysed using a meta-analysis or narrative review. Results: Ten studies, including 856 participants were analysed. The predictive markers of upper limb spasticity at one month post stroke were: motor 11.25 (odds ratio, OR); [95% CI:2.48, 51.04] and sensory impairments 4.91 (OR); [1.24, 19.46]; haemorrhagic stroke 3.70 (OR); [1.05, 12.98] and age 0.01 (OR) [0.00, 69.89]. Only motor impairment was found as a significant predictor at six months post stroke 30.68 (OR); [1.60, 587.06]. Limitations: Low number of studies exploring biomechanical and neurophysiological in addition to behavioural predictors of spasticity were included. Conclusion and implications of key findings: Using the results, the identified predictive markers have potential to better inform clinical decision-making and to plan specific rehabilitation interventions by physiotherapists for stroke survivors with upper limb spasticity. Systematic Review Registration Number PROSPERO (ID: CRD42016027642).

KW - Contracture

KW - Muscle tone

KW - Prediction

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Stroke

KW - Upper limb

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061144655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.physio.2019.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.physio.2019.01.004

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 163

EP - 173

IS - 2

ER -