Predicted bounds on peak global mean sea level during marine isotope stages 5a and 5c

Jessica R. Creveling, Jerry X. Mitrovica, Peter U. Clark, Claire Waelbroeck, Tamara Pico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Estimates of marine isotope stage (MIS) 5c and 5a global mean sea level (GMSL) based on marine terraces and coastal indicators range from 15–37 m and 9–30 m below present, respectively. Tectonic displacement and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) complicate efforts to refine this range. We revisit this issue using numerical predictions of post-glacial sea-level change and updated estimates of site-specific tectonic signals based upon these predictions. Laurentide and Cordilleran peripheral bulge dynamics and variations in the gravitational effect of these ice masses dominate the GIA signal along the east and west coasts of North America. Published compilations suggest that MIS 5 sea-level indicators extending from Virginia to the Caribbean lie on the outer flank of the peripheral bulge, while those along a transect from Oregon to Baja California sit on the inner flank of the bulge. Our GIA modeling reconciles these data by adopting a significantly weaker (i.e., lower viscosity) upper mantle in analyzing data on the Pacific coast relative to the Atlantic, an inference supported by seismic tomography. We present a sensitivity analysis that compares the observed elevation of globally distributed high stand markers to a suite of GIA simulations that vary the Earth model and GMSL from the Last Interglaciation (MIS 5e, ∼130-115 ka) to 70 ka. We conclude that GMSL peaked at −8.5 ± 4.6 m (1σ) during MIS 5a and −9.4 ± 5.3 m during MIS 5c. A more restrictive analysis yields slightly wider bounds corresponding to −10.5 ± 5.5 m and −11.1 ± 6.6 m, respectively.

LanguageEnglish
Pages193-208
Number of pages16
JournalQuaternary Science Reviews
Volume163
Early online date3 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Fingerprint

marine isotope stage
sea level
isotopes
tectonics
coasts
prediction
seismic tomography
coast
tomography
terraces
Postglacial
sea level change
terrace
sensitivity analysis
upper mantle
viscosity
ice
transect
Sea Level
Isotopes

Keywords

  • Quaternary
  • MIS 5
  • Global
  • Sea-level changes
  • Numerical modeling
  • Glacial isostatic adjustment
  • Geomorphology
  • Coastal
  • Glaciology (paleo-ice sheets)

Cite this

Creveling, Jessica R. ; Mitrovica, Jerry X. ; Clark, Peter U. ; Waelbroeck, Claire ; Pico, Tamara. / Predicted bounds on peak global mean sea level during marine isotope stages 5a and 5c. In: Quaternary Science Reviews. 2017 ; Vol. 163. pp. 193-208.
@article{4a4fe4e51b5c43bdbf1b821b8da6a763,
title = "Predicted bounds on peak global mean sea level during marine isotope stages 5a and 5c",
abstract = "Estimates of marine isotope stage (MIS) 5c and 5a global mean sea level (GMSL) based on marine terraces and coastal indicators range from 15–37 m and 9–30 m below present, respectively. Tectonic displacement and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) complicate efforts to refine this range. We revisit this issue using numerical predictions of post-glacial sea-level change and updated estimates of site-specific tectonic signals based upon these predictions. Laurentide and Cordilleran peripheral bulge dynamics and variations in the gravitational effect of these ice masses dominate the GIA signal along the east and west coasts of North America. Published compilations suggest that MIS 5 sea-level indicators extending from Virginia to the Caribbean lie on the outer flank of the peripheral bulge, while those along a transect from Oregon to Baja California sit on the inner flank of the bulge. Our GIA modeling reconciles these data by adopting a significantly weaker (i.e., lower viscosity) upper mantle in analyzing data on the Pacific coast relative to the Atlantic, an inference supported by seismic tomography. We present a sensitivity analysis that compares the observed elevation of globally distributed high stand markers to a suite of GIA simulations that vary the Earth model and GMSL from the Last Interglaciation (MIS 5e, ∼130-115 ka) to 70 ka. We conclude that GMSL peaked at −8.5 ± 4.6 m (1σ) during MIS 5a and −9.4 ± 5.3 m during MIS 5c. A more restrictive analysis yields slightly wider bounds corresponding to −10.5 ± 5.5 m and −11.1 ± 6.6 m, respectively.",
keywords = "Quaternary, MIS 5, Global, Sea-level changes, Numerical modeling, Glacial isostatic adjustment, Geomorphology, Coastal, Glaciology (paleo-ice sheets)",
author = "Creveling, {Jessica R.} and Mitrovica, {Jerry X.} and Clark, {Peter U.} and Claire Waelbroeck and Tamara Pico",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.03.003",
language = "English",
volume = "163",
pages = "193--208",
journal = "Quaternary Science Reviews",
issn = "0277-3791",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Predicted bounds on peak global mean sea level during marine isotope stages 5a and 5c. / Creveling, Jessica R.; Mitrovica, Jerry X.; Clark, Peter U.; Waelbroeck, Claire; Pico, Tamara.

In: Quaternary Science Reviews, Vol. 163, 01.05.2017, p. 193-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicted bounds on peak global mean sea level during marine isotope stages 5a and 5c

AU - Creveling, Jessica R.

AU - Mitrovica, Jerry X.

AU - Clark, Peter U.

AU - Waelbroeck, Claire

AU - Pico, Tamara

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Estimates of marine isotope stage (MIS) 5c and 5a global mean sea level (GMSL) based on marine terraces and coastal indicators range from 15–37 m and 9–30 m below present, respectively. Tectonic displacement and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) complicate efforts to refine this range. We revisit this issue using numerical predictions of post-glacial sea-level change and updated estimates of site-specific tectonic signals based upon these predictions. Laurentide and Cordilleran peripheral bulge dynamics and variations in the gravitational effect of these ice masses dominate the GIA signal along the east and west coasts of North America. Published compilations suggest that MIS 5 sea-level indicators extending from Virginia to the Caribbean lie on the outer flank of the peripheral bulge, while those along a transect from Oregon to Baja California sit on the inner flank of the bulge. Our GIA modeling reconciles these data by adopting a significantly weaker (i.e., lower viscosity) upper mantle in analyzing data on the Pacific coast relative to the Atlantic, an inference supported by seismic tomography. We present a sensitivity analysis that compares the observed elevation of globally distributed high stand markers to a suite of GIA simulations that vary the Earth model and GMSL from the Last Interglaciation (MIS 5e, ∼130-115 ka) to 70 ka. We conclude that GMSL peaked at −8.5 ± 4.6 m (1σ) during MIS 5a and −9.4 ± 5.3 m during MIS 5c. A more restrictive analysis yields slightly wider bounds corresponding to −10.5 ± 5.5 m and −11.1 ± 6.6 m, respectively.

AB - Estimates of marine isotope stage (MIS) 5c and 5a global mean sea level (GMSL) based on marine terraces and coastal indicators range from 15–37 m and 9–30 m below present, respectively. Tectonic displacement and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) complicate efforts to refine this range. We revisit this issue using numerical predictions of post-glacial sea-level change and updated estimates of site-specific tectonic signals based upon these predictions. Laurentide and Cordilleran peripheral bulge dynamics and variations in the gravitational effect of these ice masses dominate the GIA signal along the east and west coasts of North America. Published compilations suggest that MIS 5 sea-level indicators extending from Virginia to the Caribbean lie on the outer flank of the peripheral bulge, while those along a transect from Oregon to Baja California sit on the inner flank of the bulge. Our GIA modeling reconciles these data by adopting a significantly weaker (i.e., lower viscosity) upper mantle in analyzing data on the Pacific coast relative to the Atlantic, an inference supported by seismic tomography. We present a sensitivity analysis that compares the observed elevation of globally distributed high stand markers to a suite of GIA simulations that vary the Earth model and GMSL from the Last Interglaciation (MIS 5e, ∼130-115 ka) to 70 ka. We conclude that GMSL peaked at −8.5 ± 4.6 m (1σ) during MIS 5a and −9.4 ± 5.3 m during MIS 5c. A more restrictive analysis yields slightly wider bounds corresponding to −10.5 ± 5.5 m and −11.1 ± 6.6 m, respectively.

KW - Quaternary

KW - MIS 5

KW - Global

KW - Sea-level changes

KW - Numerical modeling

KW - Glacial isostatic adjustment

KW - Geomorphology

KW - Coastal

KW - Glaciology (paleo-ice sheets)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016568146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.03.003

M3 - Article

VL - 163

SP - 193

EP - 208

JO - Quaternary Science Reviews

T2 - Quaternary Science Reviews

JF - Quaternary Science Reviews

SN - 0277-3791

ER -