Practice versus policy-led coastal defence management

MC O'Connor, G Lymbery, Andrew Cooper, J Gault, John McKenna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Throughout northwest European coastal countries risks associated with coastal erosion are significant but spatially and temporally variable. The level of this risk is largely dependent on the extent of development within the coastal zones and a variety of approaches have been adopted for its management. The decision-making process for responding to erosion risk depends to a large extent on national policy. Coastal protection policy in northwest European countries varies in terms of the level of centralisation and formality of arrangements. In this paper the practical outworking of the informal practice-based system of Ireland, where there is no national policy framework, is compared with the policy-led system of England and Wales where formal national guidelines exist. Using case studies, the strengths and weaknesses of both the bottom-up and top-down approaches are assessed. The findings reveal strengths and weaknesses in both existing types of approach. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LanguageEnglish
Pages923-929
JournalMarine Policy
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

coastal protection
top-down approach
centralization
coastal erosion
coastal zone
decision making
erosion
policy

Keywords

  • Ireland
  • England
  • Wales
  • Coastal protection policy
  • Coastal management
  • Shoreline management plans

Cite this

O'Connor, MC ; Lymbery, G ; Cooper, Andrew ; Gault, J ; McKenna, John. / Practice versus policy-led coastal defence management. 2009 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 923-929.
@article{daef821c893943d38301cba8c98ddd92,
title = "Practice versus policy-led coastal defence management",
abstract = "Throughout northwest European coastal countries risks associated with coastal erosion are significant but spatially and temporally variable. The level of this risk is largely dependent on the extent of development within the coastal zones and a variety of approaches have been adopted for its management. The decision-making process for responding to erosion risk depends to a large extent on national policy. Coastal protection policy in northwest European countries varies in terms of the level of centralisation and formality of arrangements. In this paper the practical outworking of the informal practice-based system of Ireland, where there is no national policy framework, is compared with the policy-led system of England and Wales where formal national guidelines exist. Using case studies, the strengths and weaknesses of both the bottom-up and top-down approaches are assessed. The findings reveal strengths and weaknesses in both existing types of approach. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Ireland, England, Wales, Coastal protection policy, Coastal management, Shoreline management plans",
author = "MC O'Connor and G Lymbery and Andrew Cooper and J Gault and John McKenna",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2009.03.007",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "923--929",
number = "6",

}

Practice versus policy-led coastal defence management. / O'Connor, MC; Lymbery, G; Cooper, Andrew; Gault, J; McKenna, John.

Vol. 33, No. 6, 11.2009, p. 923-929.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice versus policy-led coastal defence management

AU - O'Connor, MC

AU - Lymbery, G

AU - Cooper, Andrew

AU - Gault, J

AU - McKenna, John

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Throughout northwest European coastal countries risks associated with coastal erosion are significant but spatially and temporally variable. The level of this risk is largely dependent on the extent of development within the coastal zones and a variety of approaches have been adopted for its management. The decision-making process for responding to erosion risk depends to a large extent on national policy. Coastal protection policy in northwest European countries varies in terms of the level of centralisation and formality of arrangements. In this paper the practical outworking of the informal practice-based system of Ireland, where there is no national policy framework, is compared with the policy-led system of England and Wales where formal national guidelines exist. Using case studies, the strengths and weaknesses of both the bottom-up and top-down approaches are assessed. The findings reveal strengths and weaknesses in both existing types of approach. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Throughout northwest European coastal countries risks associated with coastal erosion are significant but spatially and temporally variable. The level of this risk is largely dependent on the extent of development within the coastal zones and a variety of approaches have been adopted for its management. The decision-making process for responding to erosion risk depends to a large extent on national policy. Coastal protection policy in northwest European countries varies in terms of the level of centralisation and formality of arrangements. In this paper the practical outworking of the informal practice-based system of Ireland, where there is no national policy framework, is compared with the policy-led system of England and Wales where formal national guidelines exist. Using case studies, the strengths and weaknesses of both the bottom-up and top-down approaches are assessed. The findings reveal strengths and weaknesses in both existing types of approach. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Ireland

KW - England

KW - Wales

KW - Coastal protection policy

KW - Coastal management

KW - Shoreline management plans

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.03.007

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 923

EP - 929

IS - 6

ER -