Power, Struggle and State Crime: Researching Through Resistance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Following the commission of state crimes, state officials are in the privileged position of being able to mobilize significant resources to conceal their activities. Laying siege to the fortifications which facilitate denial is a difficult, often dangerous process that can, in general, only be mounted by movements of resistance. Consequently, generating conceptual tools which researchers can use to strategically manoeuvre within contexts defined by denial, struggle and resistance is a pressing methodological challenge for state crime studies. To that end, the first part of this article will present an analytical framework which helps sensitize researchers to the shifting social forces that condition denial and resistance. In the second part of this article the analytical framework will be applied to an empirical case study in order to demonstrate the practical research outcomes which these shifting social forces can engender. It will be concluded that state crime researchers must work with the rhythm of struggle, using research methodologies which permit strategic action.
LanguageEnglish
Pages126-148
JournalState Crime Journal
Volume1
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

power struggle
offense
methodology
resources

Keywords

  • state crime
  • crimes of the powerful
  • methodology
  • resistance
  • Bougainville

Cite this

@article{36d816d795184dc0b43bb209a6d77596,
title = "Power, Struggle and State Crime: Researching Through Resistance",
abstract = "Following the commission of state crimes, state officials are in the privileged position of being able to mobilize significant resources to conceal their activities. Laying siege to the fortifications which facilitate denial is a difficult, often dangerous process that can, in general, only be mounted by movements of resistance. Consequently, generating conceptual tools which researchers can use to strategically manoeuvre within contexts defined by denial, struggle and resistance is a pressing methodological challenge for state crime studies. To that end, the first part of this article will present an analytical framework which helps sensitize researchers to the shifting social forces that condition denial and resistance. In the second part of this article the analytical framework will be applied to an empirical case study in order to demonstrate the practical research outcomes which these shifting social forces can engender. It will be concluded that state crime researchers must work with the rhythm of struggle, using research methodologies which permit strategic action.",
keywords = "state crime, crimes of the powerful, methodology, resistance, Bougainville",
author = "Kristian Lasslett",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "126--148",
journal = "State Crime Journal",
issn = "2046-6056",
number = "1",

}

Power, Struggle and State Crime: Researching Through Resistance. / Lasslett, Kristian.

In: State Crime Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, 04.2012, p. 126-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power, Struggle and State Crime: Researching Through Resistance

AU - Lasslett, Kristian

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Following the commission of state crimes, state officials are in the privileged position of being able to mobilize significant resources to conceal their activities. Laying siege to the fortifications which facilitate denial is a difficult, often dangerous process that can, in general, only be mounted by movements of resistance. Consequently, generating conceptual tools which researchers can use to strategically manoeuvre within contexts defined by denial, struggle and resistance is a pressing methodological challenge for state crime studies. To that end, the first part of this article will present an analytical framework which helps sensitize researchers to the shifting social forces that condition denial and resistance. In the second part of this article the analytical framework will be applied to an empirical case study in order to demonstrate the practical research outcomes which these shifting social forces can engender. It will be concluded that state crime researchers must work with the rhythm of struggle, using research methodologies which permit strategic action.

AB - Following the commission of state crimes, state officials are in the privileged position of being able to mobilize significant resources to conceal their activities. Laying siege to the fortifications which facilitate denial is a difficult, often dangerous process that can, in general, only be mounted by movements of resistance. Consequently, generating conceptual tools which researchers can use to strategically manoeuvre within contexts defined by denial, struggle and resistance is a pressing methodological challenge for state crime studies. To that end, the first part of this article will present an analytical framework which helps sensitize researchers to the shifting social forces that condition denial and resistance. In the second part of this article the analytical framework will be applied to an empirical case study in order to demonstrate the practical research outcomes which these shifting social forces can engender. It will be concluded that state crime researchers must work with the rhythm of struggle, using research methodologies which permit strategic action.

KW - state crime

KW - crimes of the powerful

KW - methodology

KW - resistance

KW - Bougainville

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 126

EP - 148

JO - State Crime Journal

T2 - State Crime Journal

JF - State Crime Journal

SN - 2046-6056

IS - 1

ER -