Abstract
This paper documents and examines the efforts of the UK government to manage COVID-19. Arguing that these efforts were influenced by commitments to neoliberal biopolitics and governmental strategies of control, it draws from a range of sources to contrast the UK response with alternative aspirations and applications of power in Vietnam and China. Findings highlight the social and political nature of the pandemic, illustrating how different values and strategies generated distinct policies and experiences. This contrast reveals the development and efficacy of new forms of control, alongside alternatives to neoliberal biopolitics that seek to protect and produce life in new ways.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-20 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Journal of Political Power |
| Early online date | 31 Jan 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published online - 31 Jan 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Covid -19
- biopolitics
- neoliberalism
- Vietnam
- China
- United Kingdom
- COVID-19
- Biopolitics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Power and the pandemic: how contrasting COVID-19 responses in the United Kingdom, China and Vietnam reveal alternatives to neoliberal biopolitics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver