Post-Conflict Peacebuilding, Liberal Irrelevance and the Locus of Legitimacy

David Roberts

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    29 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Post-conflict peacebuilding is failing, according to both its critics and its advocates. By way of solutions, proponents seek more of the same, whereas opponents argue for a radical shift. Both contain parts of a possible solution to the lack of local legitimacy that stigmatizes interventions, many of which descend into violence within five years and few of which produce democracies. This article advances the idea of a ‘popular peace’ that refocuses liberal institution building upon local, democratically-determined priorities deriving from ‘everyday lives’, in addition to internationally-favoured preferences (such as metropolitan courts and bureaucratic government). This is hypothesized to better confront the prevailing legitimacy lacuna, create social institutions around which a contract can evolve, and generate the foundations upon which durable peacebuilding may grow.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages410-424
    JournalInternational Peacekeeping
    Volume18
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 4 Sep 2011

    Fingerprint

    legitimacy
    social institution
    everyday life
    critic
    peace
    violence
    democracy
    lack

    Cite this

    @article{957aa8b1a4874344b5528e435ec70065,
    title = "Post-Conflict Peacebuilding, Liberal Irrelevance and the Locus of Legitimacy",
    abstract = "Post-conflict peacebuilding is failing, according to both its critics and its advocates. By way of solutions, proponents seek more of the same, whereas opponents argue for a radical shift. Both contain parts of a possible solution to the lack of local legitimacy that stigmatizes interventions, many of which descend into violence within five years and few of which produce democracies. This article advances the idea of a ‘popular peace’ that refocuses liberal institution building upon local, democratically-determined priorities deriving from ‘everyday lives’, in addition to internationally-favoured preferences (such as metropolitan courts and bureaucratic government). This is hypothesized to better confront the prevailing legitimacy lacuna, create social institutions around which a contract can evolve, and generate the foundations upon which durable peacebuilding may grow.",
    author = "David Roberts",
    year = "2011",
    month = "9",
    day = "4",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "410--424",
    journal = "International Peacekeeping",
    issn = "1353-3312",
    number = "4",

    }

    Post-Conflict Peacebuilding, Liberal Irrelevance and the Locus of Legitimacy. / Roberts, David.

    In: International Peacekeeping, Vol. 18, No. 4, 04.09.2011, p. 410-424.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Post-Conflict Peacebuilding, Liberal Irrelevance and the Locus of Legitimacy

    AU - Roberts, David

    PY - 2011/9/4

    Y1 - 2011/9/4

    N2 - Post-conflict peacebuilding is failing, according to both its critics and its advocates. By way of solutions, proponents seek more of the same, whereas opponents argue for a radical shift. Both contain parts of a possible solution to the lack of local legitimacy that stigmatizes interventions, many of which descend into violence within five years and few of which produce democracies. This article advances the idea of a ‘popular peace’ that refocuses liberal institution building upon local, democratically-determined priorities deriving from ‘everyday lives’, in addition to internationally-favoured preferences (such as metropolitan courts and bureaucratic government). This is hypothesized to better confront the prevailing legitimacy lacuna, create social institutions around which a contract can evolve, and generate the foundations upon which durable peacebuilding may grow.

    AB - Post-conflict peacebuilding is failing, according to both its critics and its advocates. By way of solutions, proponents seek more of the same, whereas opponents argue for a radical shift. Both contain parts of a possible solution to the lack of local legitimacy that stigmatizes interventions, many of which descend into violence within five years and few of which produce democracies. This article advances the idea of a ‘popular peace’ that refocuses liberal institution building upon local, democratically-determined priorities deriving from ‘everyday lives’, in addition to internationally-favoured preferences (such as metropolitan courts and bureaucratic government). This is hypothesized to better confront the prevailing legitimacy lacuna, create social institutions around which a contract can evolve, and generate the foundations upon which durable peacebuilding may grow.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 18

    SP - 410

    EP - 424

    JO - International Peacekeeping

    T2 - International Peacekeeping

    JF - International Peacekeeping

    SN - 1353-3312

    IS - 4

    ER -