Abstract
The British social security system is at a conditionality precipice, where the post-war aim of developing a centralised system to provide some semblance of economic security has become secondary to ensuring the unemployed claimant is coerced to securing complete independence from the state through termination of a social security claim. Those claimants who are furthest from the labour market are at the mercy of frontline work coaches who have been provided with extensive discretion to determine the fate of those who demonstrate any level of resistance to the terms of the highly punitive 21st-century welfare contract. Despite rhetorical assurances, that individual circumstances will be provided with due consideration in drawing up the ‘claimant commitment,’ research has shown that structural barriers to formal labour market engagement are habitually conceived as personal obstructions that are the responsibility of the individual to manage.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Research Handbook on Social Welfare Law |
| Editors | Helen Carr, Edward Kirton-Darling, Jed Meers, Maria Fernanda Salcedo Repolês |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. |
| Chapter | 4 |
| Pages | 60-80 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978 1 80037 941 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 15 Nov 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- British social security
- Punitive welfare contract
- Unemployment
- Social security claim
- Labour market
- Sanctions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''Poor citizens’: social welfare and the encouragement of work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver