Abstract
This paper explores recent changes that involve the Planning Inspectorate in England, considering aspart of this the relevance and value of independence and impartiality in effective decision-making,together with a consideration of the significance of these changes in the context of localism and thesubsidiarity narrative. To inform this debate, this paper focuses upon the value of having an independentbody for planning decisions through a comparison with the Planning Appeals Commission (PAC) inNorthern Ireland. The paper points towards the potential need for change in the structural approachand arrangements of the system in England, drawing particularly upon the PAC as a potential modelfor consideration.Keywords: appeals, independence, impartiality, subsidiarity, integrity, localism, courts, perceptions
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 53-70 |
| Journal | Town Planning Review |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 87 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 1 Apr 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- appeals
- independence
- impartiality
- subsidiarity
- integrity
- localism
- courts
- perceptions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Planning decision-making: independence, subsidiarity, impartiality and the state'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Heather Ritchie
- Belfast School of Architecture & the Be - Lecturer in Spatial Planning and Energy Policy
- Faculty Of Computing, Eng. & Built Env. - Lecturer
- Architecture, Built Environment and Planning Research
Person: Academic
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver