Place versus response learning in fish: a comparison between species.

Claire L. McAroe, Cathy M. Craig, Richard A. Holland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Place learning is thought to be an adaptive and
flexible facet of navigation. Due to the flexibility of this
learning, it is thought to be more complex than the simpler
strategies such as learning a particular route or navigating
through the use of cues. Place learning is crucial in a
familiar environment as it allows an individual to successfully
navigate to the same endpoint, regardless of
where in the environment the journey begins. Much of the
research to date focusing on different strategies employed
for navigation has used human subjects or other mammals
such as rodents. In this series of experiments, the spatial
memory of four different species of fish (goldfish, killifish,
zebrafish and Siamese fighting fish) was analysed using a
plus maze set-up. Results suggest that three of the species
showed a significant preference for the adoption of a place
strategy during this task, whereas zebrafish showed no
significant preference. Furthermore, zebrafish took significantly
longer to learn the task than the other species.
Finally, results suggest that zebrafish took the least amount
of time (seconds) to complete trials both during training
and probe.
LanguageEnglish
Pages153-161
Number of pages9
JournalAnimal Cognition
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date18 Sep 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Zebrafish
Fishes
Learning
Fundulidae
Goldfish
Cues
Rodentia

Keywords

  • navigation, spatial memory, fish, alloentric learning

Cite this

McAroe, Claire L. ; Craig, Cathy M. ; Holland, Richard A. / Place versus response learning in fish: a comparison between species. In: Animal Cognition. 2016 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 153-161.
@article{f178d3fa570d42a194537f9beb6a8386,
title = "Place versus response learning in fish: a comparison between species.",
abstract = "Place learning is thought to be an adaptive andflexible facet of navigation. Due to the flexibility of thislearning, it is thought to be more complex than the simplerstrategies such as learning a particular route or navigatingthrough the use of cues. Place learning is crucial in afamiliar environment as it allows an individual to successfullynavigate to the same endpoint, regardless ofwhere in the environment the journey begins. Much of theresearch to date focusing on different strategies employedfor navigation has used human subjects or other mammalssuch as rodents. In this series of experiments, the spatialmemory of four different species of fish (goldfish, killifish,zebrafish and Siamese fighting fish) was analysed using aplus maze set-up. Results suggest that three of the speciesshowed a significant preference for the adoption of a placestrategy during this task, whereas zebrafish showed nosignificant preference. Furthermore, zebrafish took significantlylonger to learn the task than the other species.Finally, results suggest that zebrafish took the least amountof time (seconds) to complete trials both during trainingand probe.",
keywords = "navigation, spatial memory, fish, alloentric learning",
author = "McAroe, {Claire L.} and Craig, {Cathy M.} and Holland, {Richard A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10071-015-0922-9",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "153--161",
journal = "Animal Cognition",
issn = "1435-9448",
number = "1",

}

Place versus response learning in fish: a comparison between species. / McAroe, Claire L.; Craig, Cathy M.; Holland, Richard A.

In: Animal Cognition, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.2016, p. 153-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Place versus response learning in fish: a comparison between species.

AU - McAroe, Claire L.

AU - Craig, Cathy M.

AU - Holland, Richard A.

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - Place learning is thought to be an adaptive andflexible facet of navigation. Due to the flexibility of thislearning, it is thought to be more complex than the simplerstrategies such as learning a particular route or navigatingthrough the use of cues. Place learning is crucial in afamiliar environment as it allows an individual to successfullynavigate to the same endpoint, regardless ofwhere in the environment the journey begins. Much of theresearch to date focusing on different strategies employedfor navigation has used human subjects or other mammalssuch as rodents. In this series of experiments, the spatialmemory of four different species of fish (goldfish, killifish,zebrafish and Siamese fighting fish) was analysed using aplus maze set-up. Results suggest that three of the speciesshowed a significant preference for the adoption of a placestrategy during this task, whereas zebrafish showed nosignificant preference. Furthermore, zebrafish took significantlylonger to learn the task than the other species.Finally, results suggest that zebrafish took the least amountof time (seconds) to complete trials both during trainingand probe.

AB - Place learning is thought to be an adaptive andflexible facet of navigation. Due to the flexibility of thislearning, it is thought to be more complex than the simplerstrategies such as learning a particular route or navigatingthrough the use of cues. Place learning is crucial in afamiliar environment as it allows an individual to successfullynavigate to the same endpoint, regardless ofwhere in the environment the journey begins. Much of theresearch to date focusing on different strategies employedfor navigation has used human subjects or other mammalssuch as rodents. In this series of experiments, the spatialmemory of four different species of fish (goldfish, killifish,zebrafish and Siamese fighting fish) was analysed using aplus maze set-up. Results suggest that three of the speciesshowed a significant preference for the adoption of a placestrategy during this task, whereas zebrafish showed nosignificant preference. Furthermore, zebrafish took significantlylonger to learn the task than the other species.Finally, results suggest that zebrafish took the least amountof time (seconds) to complete trials both during trainingand probe.

KW - navigation, spatial memory, fish, alloentric learning

U2 - 10.1007/s10071-015-0922-9

DO - 10.1007/s10071-015-0922-9

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 153

EP - 161

JO - Animal Cognition

T2 - Animal Cognition

JF - Animal Cognition

SN - 1435-9448

IS - 1

ER -