Optimising the glaucoma signal/noise ratio by mapping changes in spatial summation with area-modulated perimetric stimuli

Lindsay Rountree, Pádraig J. Mulholland, Roger S. Anderson, David F. Garway-Heath, Tony Redmond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Identification of glaucomatous damage and progression by perimetry are limited by measurementand response variability. This study tested the hypothesis that the glaucoma damage signal/noiseratio is greater with stimuli varying in area, either solely, or simultaneously with contrast, than with conventional stimuli varying in contrast only (Goldmann III, GIII). Thirty glaucoma patients and 20 age-similar healthy controls were tested with the Method of Constant Stimuli (MOCS). One stimulus modulated in area (A), one modulated in contrast within Ricco’s area (CR), one modulated in both area and contrast simultaneously (AC), and the reference stimulus was a GIII, modulating in contrast. Stimuli were presented on a common platform with a common scale (energy). A three-stage protocol minimised artefactual MOCS slope bias that can occur due to differences in psychometric function sampling between conditions. Threshold difference from age-matched normal (total deviation), response variability, and signal/noise ratio were compared between stimuli. Total deviation was greater with, and response variability less dependent on defect depth with A, AC, and CR stimuli, compared with GIII. Both A and AC stimuli showed a significantly greater signal/noise ratio than the GIII, indicating that area-modulated stimuli offer benefits over the GIII for identifying early glaucoma and measuring progression.
LanguageEnglish
Article number2172
Number of pages13
JournalScientific Reports
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date1 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Glaucoma
Visual Field Tests
Psychometrics

Keywords

  • Glaucoma
  • Perimetry
  • Spatial summation

Cite this

@article{27639472d9524891b0c68635549aab81,
title = "Optimising the glaucoma signal/noise ratio by mapping changes in spatial summation with area-modulated perimetric stimuli",
abstract = "Identification of glaucomatous damage and progression by perimetry are limited by measurementand response variability. This study tested the hypothesis that the glaucoma damage signal/noiseratio is greater with stimuli varying in area, either solely, or simultaneously with contrast, than with conventional stimuli varying in contrast only (Goldmann III, GIII). Thirty glaucoma patients and 20 age-similar healthy controls were tested with the Method of Constant Stimuli (MOCS). One stimulus modulated in area (A), one modulated in contrast within Ricco’s area (CR), one modulated in both area and contrast simultaneously (AC), and the reference stimulus was a GIII, modulating in contrast. Stimuli were presented on a common platform with a common scale (energy). A three-stage protocol minimised artefactual MOCS slope bias that can occur due to differences in psychometric function sampling between conditions. Threshold difference from age-matched normal (total deviation), response variability, and signal/noise ratio were compared between stimuli. Total deviation was greater with, and response variability less dependent on defect depth with A, AC, and CR stimuli, compared with GIII. Both A and AC stimuli showed a significantly greater signal/noise ratio than the GIII, indicating that area-modulated stimuli offer benefits over the GIII for identifying early glaucoma and measuring progression.",
keywords = "Glaucoma, Perimetry, Spatial summation",
author = "Lindsay Rountree and Mulholland, {P{\'a}draig J.} and Anderson, {Roger S.} and Garway-Heath, {David F.} and Tony Redmond",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-018-20480-4",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
number = "1",

}

Optimising the glaucoma signal/noise ratio by mapping changes in spatial summation with area-modulated perimetric stimuli. / Rountree, Lindsay; Mulholland, Pádraig J.; Anderson, Roger S.; Garway-Heath, David F.; Redmond, Tony.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2172, 01.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimising the glaucoma signal/noise ratio by mapping changes in spatial summation with area-modulated perimetric stimuli

AU - Rountree, Lindsay

AU - Mulholland, Pádraig J.

AU - Anderson, Roger S.

AU - Garway-Heath, David F.

AU - Redmond, Tony

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Identification of glaucomatous damage and progression by perimetry are limited by measurementand response variability. This study tested the hypothesis that the glaucoma damage signal/noiseratio is greater with stimuli varying in area, either solely, or simultaneously with contrast, than with conventional stimuli varying in contrast only (Goldmann III, GIII). Thirty glaucoma patients and 20 age-similar healthy controls were tested with the Method of Constant Stimuli (MOCS). One stimulus modulated in area (A), one modulated in contrast within Ricco’s area (CR), one modulated in both area and contrast simultaneously (AC), and the reference stimulus was a GIII, modulating in contrast. Stimuli were presented on a common platform with a common scale (energy). A three-stage protocol minimised artefactual MOCS slope bias that can occur due to differences in psychometric function sampling between conditions. Threshold difference from age-matched normal (total deviation), response variability, and signal/noise ratio were compared between stimuli. Total deviation was greater with, and response variability less dependent on defect depth with A, AC, and CR stimuli, compared with GIII. Both A and AC stimuli showed a significantly greater signal/noise ratio than the GIII, indicating that area-modulated stimuli offer benefits over the GIII for identifying early glaucoma and measuring progression.

AB - Identification of glaucomatous damage and progression by perimetry are limited by measurementand response variability. This study tested the hypothesis that the glaucoma damage signal/noiseratio is greater with stimuli varying in area, either solely, or simultaneously with contrast, than with conventional stimuli varying in contrast only (Goldmann III, GIII). Thirty glaucoma patients and 20 age-similar healthy controls were tested with the Method of Constant Stimuli (MOCS). One stimulus modulated in area (A), one modulated in contrast within Ricco’s area (CR), one modulated in both area and contrast simultaneously (AC), and the reference stimulus was a GIII, modulating in contrast. Stimuli were presented on a common platform with a common scale (energy). A three-stage protocol minimised artefactual MOCS slope bias that can occur due to differences in psychometric function sampling between conditions. Threshold difference from age-matched normal (total deviation), response variability, and signal/noise ratio were compared between stimuli. Total deviation was greater with, and response variability less dependent on defect depth with A, AC, and CR stimuli, compared with GIII. Both A and AC stimuli showed a significantly greater signal/noise ratio than the GIII, indicating that area-modulated stimuli offer benefits over the GIII for identifying early glaucoma and measuring progression.

KW - Glaucoma

KW - Perimetry

KW - Spatial summation

UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-20480-4

UR - https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/en/publications/optimising-the-glaucoma-signalnoise-ratio-by-mapping-changes-in-s

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-20480-4

DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-20480-4

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Scientific Reports

T2 - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 2172

ER -