Operational Parameters, Data Density and Benthic Ecology: Considerations for Image-Based Classification of Multibeam Backscatter

C McGonigle, CJ Brown, R Quinn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Efforts to develop a procedurally robust method for automated classification of multibeam backscatter have taken a variety of approaches (e.g., image-based, textural, angular range analysis). For image-based classification, little research has focused on the roles of operational parameters of vessel and sonar system in affecting the final classification. Repeat multibeam surveys (2005 and 2006) conducted at the same area with different sounding densities were classified using QTC-Multiview. Comparison of class areas revealed 78% agreement between classifications derived from the two surveys. Cross-tabulation of ground truth video and class demonstrate 71% agreement in the low-density survey and 77% for the high-density. Differences between classifications are primarily attributed to variation in along track data density, errors in the compensation process, and/ or insufficient quality control of the input data. Natural change detection at the scales observed was determined not to be practically discernable from the errors associated with the classification process.
LanguageEnglish
Pages16-38
JournalMarine Geodesy
Volume33
Issue number1
Early online date26 Feb 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

backscatter
ecology
sonar
quality control
parameter
vessel

Keywords

  • Multibeam
  • backscatter
  • image-based
  • classification
  • time-series

Cite this

@article{0bc6938740b0473590c48284158d6852,
title = "Operational Parameters, Data Density and Benthic Ecology: Considerations for Image-Based Classification of Multibeam Backscatter",
abstract = "Efforts to develop a procedurally robust method for automated classification of multibeam backscatter have taken a variety of approaches (e.g., image-based, textural, angular range analysis). For image-based classification, little research has focused on the roles of operational parameters of vessel and sonar system in affecting the final classification. Repeat multibeam surveys (2005 and 2006) conducted at the same area with different sounding densities were classified using QTC-Multiview. Comparison of class areas revealed 78{\%} agreement between classifications derived from the two surveys. Cross-tabulation of ground truth video and class demonstrate 71{\%} agreement in the low-density survey and 77{\%} for the high-density. Differences between classifications are primarily attributed to variation in along track data density, errors in the compensation process, and/ or insufficient quality control of the input data. Natural change detection at the scales observed was determined not to be practically discernable from the errors associated with the classification process.",
keywords = "Multibeam, backscatter, image-based, classification, time-series",
author = "C McGonigle and CJ Brown and R Quinn",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/01490410903530273",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "16--38",
journal = "Marine Geodesy",
issn = "0149-0419",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operational Parameters, Data Density and Benthic Ecology: Considerations for Image-Based Classification of Multibeam Backscatter

AU - McGonigle, C

AU - Brown, CJ

AU - Quinn, R

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Efforts to develop a procedurally robust method for automated classification of multibeam backscatter have taken a variety of approaches (e.g., image-based, textural, angular range analysis). For image-based classification, little research has focused on the roles of operational parameters of vessel and sonar system in affecting the final classification. Repeat multibeam surveys (2005 and 2006) conducted at the same area with different sounding densities were classified using QTC-Multiview. Comparison of class areas revealed 78% agreement between classifications derived from the two surveys. Cross-tabulation of ground truth video and class demonstrate 71% agreement in the low-density survey and 77% for the high-density. Differences between classifications are primarily attributed to variation in along track data density, errors in the compensation process, and/ or insufficient quality control of the input data. Natural change detection at the scales observed was determined not to be practically discernable from the errors associated with the classification process.

AB - Efforts to develop a procedurally robust method for automated classification of multibeam backscatter have taken a variety of approaches (e.g., image-based, textural, angular range analysis). For image-based classification, little research has focused on the roles of operational parameters of vessel and sonar system in affecting the final classification. Repeat multibeam surveys (2005 and 2006) conducted at the same area with different sounding densities were classified using QTC-Multiview. Comparison of class areas revealed 78% agreement between classifications derived from the two surveys. Cross-tabulation of ground truth video and class demonstrate 71% agreement in the low-density survey and 77% for the high-density. Differences between classifications are primarily attributed to variation in along track data density, errors in the compensation process, and/ or insufficient quality control of the input data. Natural change detection at the scales observed was determined not to be practically discernable from the errors associated with the classification process.

KW - Multibeam

KW - backscatter

KW - image-based

KW - classification

KW - time-series

U2 - 10.1080/01490410903530273

DO - 10.1080/01490410903530273

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 16

EP - 38

JO - Marine Geodesy

T2 - Marine Geodesy

JF - Marine Geodesy

SN - 0149-0419

IS - 1

ER -