Ontological security and protracted conflict in frontier societies: towards a trans-local turn in peacebuilding

Dong Jin Kim, Duncan Morrow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article proposes a trans-local turn in peacebuilding in frontier societies. Drawing on René Girard’s concept of ‘mimetic desire’, the article conceptualises how a crisis of ontological insecurity cannot be addressed by rational approaches to institutionalising a process to resolve incompatibilities between conflict parties, but requires de-escalation of the mimetic rivalry between the parties, who are often described as being in conflict over identity. Empirically, the article focuses on the, apparently very different, examples of intractable conflicts in Northern Ireland and Korea, and the trans-local peacebuilding interactions between the two. This article demonstrates how relationships of unresolved mimetic rivalry have intensified ontological insecurity in both cases, creating dynamics of existential anxiety and mutual antagonism, and how the reflexivity based on peacebuilding stories from other frontier societies, which do not impose direct ontological threats, appears to increase hope for change by transcending the endemic sense of ontological insecurity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalPeacebuilding
Early online date26 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 26 Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Ontological security
  • trans-local peacebuilding
  • mimetic theory
  • Northern Ireland
  • Korea

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ontological security and protracted conflict in frontier societies: towards a trans-local turn in peacebuilding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this