ON THE POSSIBLE CAUSAL RELATION BETWEEN PERCEIVED SPATIAL ORIENTATION AND INDUCED MOTION

Anthony Reinhardt-Rutland

ON THE POSSIBLE CAUSAL RELATION BETWEEN PERCEIVED SPATIAL ORIENTATION AND INDUCED MOTION

Anthony Reinhardt-Rutland

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In 1994 Brooks and Sherrick showed that both the rod-and-frame effect and frame-and-spot-induced motion increase as the inducing frame is made larger. This suggests that change in perceived spatial orientation causes induced motion. Here it is argued that the rod-and-frame effect is more appropriately compared with induced rotation, which differs from frame-and-spot-induced motion in a number of ways. It is argued that the rod-and-frame effect may inhibit induced rotation.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	641-642
Journal	Perceptual and Motor Skills
Volume	80
Issue number	2
Publication status	Published (in print/issue) - Apr 1995

Cite this

@article{6a97f829656d458590d190a5156fe823,

title = "ON THE POSSIBLE CAUSAL RELATION BETWEEN PERCEIVED SPATIAL ORIENTATION AND INDUCED MOTION",

abstract = "In 1994 Brooks and Sherrick showed that both the rod-and-frame effect and frame-and-spot-induced motion increase as the inducing frame is made larger. This suggests that change in perceived spatial orientation causes induced motion. Here it is argued that the rod-and-frame effect is more appropriately compared with induced rotation, which differs from frame-and-spot-induced motion in a number of ways. It is argued that the rod-and-frame effect may inhibit induced rotation.",

author = "Anthony Reinhardt-Rutland",

year = "1995",

month = apr,

language = "English",

volume = "80",

pages = "641--642",

journal = "Perceptual and Motor Skills",

issn = "1558-688X",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ON THE POSSIBLE CAUSAL RELATION BETWEEN PERCEIVED SPATIAL ORIENTATION AND INDUCED MOTION

AU - Reinhardt-Rutland, Anthony

PY - 1995/4

Y1 - 1995/4

N2 - In 1994 Brooks and Sherrick showed that both the rod-and-frame effect and frame-and-spot-induced motion increase as the inducing frame is made larger. This suggests that change in perceived spatial orientation causes induced motion. Here it is argued that the rod-and-frame effect is more appropriately compared with induced rotation, which differs from frame-and-spot-induced motion in a number of ways. It is argued that the rod-and-frame effect may inhibit induced rotation.

AB - In 1994 Brooks and Sherrick showed that both the rod-and-frame effect and frame-and-spot-induced motion increase as the inducing frame is made larger. This suggests that change in perceived spatial orientation causes induced motion. Here it is argued that the rod-and-frame effect is more appropriately compared with induced rotation, which differs from frame-and-spot-induced motion in a number of ways. It is argued that the rod-and-frame effect may inhibit induced rotation.

M3 - Article

SN - 1558-688X

VL - 80

SP - 641

EP - 642

JO - Perceptual and Motor Skills

JF - Perceptual and Motor Skills

IS - 2

ER -

ON THE POSSIBLE CAUSAL RELATION BETWEEN PERCEIVED SPATIAL ORIENTATION AND INDUCED MOTION

Abstract

Fingerprint

Cite this