Old wine in new bottles? Syndicalism and ‘fakirism’ in the Great Labour Unrest, 1911 1914

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

No conceptual tool is as useful or as controversial for analysing the Great Labour Unrest as syndicalism. This is not to say that syndicalism explains the militancy, but that it offers a prism through which we can examine its characteristics and the ideas behind it, and cut to the core of the historiographical debate. The paper argues that the industrial conflict of 1889 to 1914 was all of a piece, and that the Great Unrest of 1911-1914 was its ultimate expression; secondly, that there was a correlation between the growth of syndicalism and of militancy throughout the industrial world from 1900, and that these shaped the context of the British unrest; thirdly, that the influence of syndicalism was not due to the lure of irrationality, but to the practical appeal of industrial unionism as a strategy and of sympathetic action as a method of struggle; fourthly, that characteristics like violence and workerism were responses to the use of state force and disillusionment with the perceived inadequacy of the Trades Union Congress and the Labour Party in defending workers; and fifthly, that the constitutional crisis was essentially a crisis of the establishment. Finally, the contrasting fortunes of syndicalism in Britain and Ireland will be assessed for what they tell us about the merits of ‘dual unionism’ and ‘boring from within’, the alternative strategies which were keenly debated among contemporary syndicalists.
LanguageEnglish
Pages19-36
JournalLabour History Review
Volume79
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2014

Fingerprint

Wine
Unrest
Labor
Bottle
Militancy
Unionism
Workers
Trade unions
Irrationality
Industrial conflict
Ireland
Cut
Trade Unions
Fortune
Merit
Labour Party

Keywords

  • Industrial relations
  • Labour
  • Strikes
  • Syndicalism
  • Trade Unions

Cite this

@article{36ca61af5afb4c1189c692ab5ee13071,
title = "Old wine in new bottles? Syndicalism and ‘fakirism’ in the Great Labour Unrest, 1911 1914",
abstract = "No conceptual tool is as useful or as controversial for analysing the Great Labour Unrest as syndicalism. This is not to say that syndicalism explains the militancy, but that it offers a prism through which we can examine its characteristics and the ideas behind it, and cut to the core of the historiographical debate. The paper argues that the industrial conflict of 1889 to 1914 was all of a piece, and that the Great Unrest of 1911-1914 was its ultimate expression; secondly, that there was a correlation between the growth of syndicalism and of militancy throughout the industrial world from 1900, and that these shaped the context of the British unrest; thirdly, that the influence of syndicalism was not due to the lure of irrationality, but to the practical appeal of industrial unionism as a strategy and of sympathetic action as a method of struggle; fourthly, that characteristics like violence and workerism were responses to the use of state force and disillusionment with the perceived inadequacy of the Trades Union Congress and the Labour Party in defending workers; and fifthly, that the constitutional crisis was essentially a crisis of the establishment. Finally, the contrasting fortunes of syndicalism in Britain and Ireland will be assessed for what they tell us about the merits of ‘dual unionism’ and ‘boring from within’, the alternative strategies which were keenly debated among contemporary syndicalists.",
keywords = "Industrial relations, Labour, Strikes, Syndicalism, Trade Unions",
author = "E O'Connor",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3828/lhr.2014.2",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "19--36",
journal = "Labour History Review",
issn = "0961-5652",
number = "1",

}

Old wine in new bottles? Syndicalism and ‘fakirism’ in the Great Labour Unrest, 1911 1914. / O'Connor, E.

In: Labour History Review, Vol. 79, No. 1, 01.05.2014, p. 19-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Old wine in new bottles? Syndicalism and ‘fakirism’ in the Great Labour Unrest, 1911 1914

AU - O'Connor, E

PY - 2014/5/1

Y1 - 2014/5/1

N2 - No conceptual tool is as useful or as controversial for analysing the Great Labour Unrest as syndicalism. This is not to say that syndicalism explains the militancy, but that it offers a prism through which we can examine its characteristics and the ideas behind it, and cut to the core of the historiographical debate. The paper argues that the industrial conflict of 1889 to 1914 was all of a piece, and that the Great Unrest of 1911-1914 was its ultimate expression; secondly, that there was a correlation between the growth of syndicalism and of militancy throughout the industrial world from 1900, and that these shaped the context of the British unrest; thirdly, that the influence of syndicalism was not due to the lure of irrationality, but to the practical appeal of industrial unionism as a strategy and of sympathetic action as a method of struggle; fourthly, that characteristics like violence and workerism were responses to the use of state force and disillusionment with the perceived inadequacy of the Trades Union Congress and the Labour Party in defending workers; and fifthly, that the constitutional crisis was essentially a crisis of the establishment. Finally, the contrasting fortunes of syndicalism in Britain and Ireland will be assessed for what they tell us about the merits of ‘dual unionism’ and ‘boring from within’, the alternative strategies which were keenly debated among contemporary syndicalists.

AB - No conceptual tool is as useful or as controversial for analysing the Great Labour Unrest as syndicalism. This is not to say that syndicalism explains the militancy, but that it offers a prism through which we can examine its characteristics and the ideas behind it, and cut to the core of the historiographical debate. The paper argues that the industrial conflict of 1889 to 1914 was all of a piece, and that the Great Unrest of 1911-1914 was its ultimate expression; secondly, that there was a correlation between the growth of syndicalism and of militancy throughout the industrial world from 1900, and that these shaped the context of the British unrest; thirdly, that the influence of syndicalism was not due to the lure of irrationality, but to the practical appeal of industrial unionism as a strategy and of sympathetic action as a method of struggle; fourthly, that characteristics like violence and workerism were responses to the use of state force and disillusionment with the perceived inadequacy of the Trades Union Congress and the Labour Party in defending workers; and fifthly, that the constitutional crisis was essentially a crisis of the establishment. Finally, the contrasting fortunes of syndicalism in Britain and Ireland will be assessed for what they tell us about the merits of ‘dual unionism’ and ‘boring from within’, the alternative strategies which were keenly debated among contemporary syndicalists.

KW - Industrial relations

KW - Labour

KW - Strikes

KW - Syndicalism

KW - Trade Unions

U2 - 10.3828/lhr.2014.2

DO - 10.3828/lhr.2014.2

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 19

EP - 36

JO - Labour History Review

T2 - Labour History Review

JF - Labour History Review

SN - 0961-5652

IS - 1

ER -