Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Of Prosecutions and Amnesties: Does Fiji’s Experience Suggest a Reconsideration?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the purpose and effectiveness of truth commissions from a Fijian perspective. The problems of dealing with past regimes’ crimes, from the Nuremberg trials to the modern international criminal tribunals, have been a feature of the international system in the 20th century. This article argues against the universality of the pragmatist approach in dealing with past regime crimes. It contends that, in certain circumstances, the ideal option of prosecuting past crimes is feasible and practical in transitional societies. This article argues that Fiji is one such society. In doing so, the article examines the reconciliation and healing process in Fiji and its effectiveness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-43
Number of pages43
JournalAustralian Journal of Asian Law
Volume9
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished online - 1 May 2007

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Amnesty
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Human rights
  • Reconciliation-Political aspects
  • Truth commissions
  • international Tribunal for Rwanda
  • Fiji
  • Humanitarian Law
  • War crimes trials

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Of Prosecutions and Amnesties: Does Fiji’s Experience Suggest a Reconsideration?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this