Abstract
This article examines the purpose and effectiveness of truth commissions from a Fijian perspective. The problems of dealing with past regimes’ crimes, from the Nuremberg trials to the modern international criminal tribunals, have been a feature of the international system in the 20th century. This article argues against the universality of the pragmatist approach in dealing with past regime crimes. It contends that, in certain circumstances, the ideal option of prosecuting past crimes is feasible and practical in transitional societies. This article argues that Fiji is one such society. In doing so, the article examines the reconciliation and healing process in Fiji and its effectiveness.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-43 |
| Number of pages | 43 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Asian Law |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published online - 1 May 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Amnesty
- Crimes against humanity
- Human rights
- Reconciliation-Political aspects
- Truth commissions
- international Tribunal for Rwanda
- Fiji
- Humanitarian Law
- War crimes trials
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Of Prosecutions and Amnesties: Does Fiji’s Experience Suggest a Reconsideration?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver