Nutrient emissions to water from septic tank systems in rural catchments: Uncertainties and implications for policy

P.J.A. Withers, L. May, H.P. Jarvie, Philip Jordan, D. Doody, R.H. Foy, M. Bechmann, S. Cooksley, R. Dils, N. Deal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Septic tank systems (STS) are widely used to treat domestic wastewater from individual dwellings in rural areas but are a potential source of water pollution. However, their contribution to freshwater eutrophication and impacts on human health are uncertain and difficult to quantify. Five case studies are presented to highlight the issues underpinning this problem. Uncertainty exists over the numbers and locations of STS because registration is not fully implemented in all regions. Underestimating the numbers of STS located in a catchment can lead to overestimation of the relative contribution from diffuse sources such as agriculture. In turn, this may lead to potential delays in meeting water quality limits due to disproportionate targeting of potential sources. System performance is uncertain due to a lack of information on factors (such as siting, design, age, nature and level of maintenance, proximity to a watercourse) that affect nutrient retention rates. Many systems still discharge directly to a watercourse, or to a drainage network closely connected to a watercourse despite prohibition of such discharges. Their effect on water quality is also uncertain because current nutrient abatement policies ignore the temporal variation in nutrient loading that can influence ecological response in streams and connecting ditches. These case studies show that although STS constitute a relatively small (often <10%) portion of total annual catchment nutrient loads, they can still significantly increase in-stream nutrient concentrations, especially during low flow periods in summer. STS may therefore be a greater risk to riverine eutrophication and human health than is currently assumed. More sophisticated resolution of source apportionment is needed to fully capture water quality impairment due to clustering of STS along stream networks. Targeted surveys and public awareness campaigns are useful tools for identifying failing STS, improving STS maintenance and highlighting alternative treatment options for use in catchment areas that are especially sensitive or valuable. These case studies support the need for a risk-based policy of STS registration and regulation governing maintenance to avoid further declines in the ecosystem services our freshwaters provide.
LanguageEnglish
Pages71-82
JournalEnvironmental Science & Policy
Volume24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

catchment
nutrient
water quality
eutrophication
emission to water
policy
septic tank
drainage network
ecosystem service
water pollution
low flow
targeting
rural area
temporal variation
agriculture
wastewater
summer
watercourse

Keywords

  • Policy

Cite this

Withers, P.J.A. ; May, L. ; Jarvie, H.P. ; Jordan, Philip ; Doody, D. ; Foy, R.H. ; Bechmann, M. ; Cooksley, S. ; Dils, R. ; Deal, N. / Nutrient emissions to water from septic tank systems in rural catchments: Uncertainties and implications for policy. In: Environmental Science & Policy. 2012 ; Vol. 24. pp. 71-82.
@article{a8763437d1ed4a5499d958bae7111d27,
title = "Nutrient emissions to water from septic tank systems in rural catchments: Uncertainties and implications for policy",
abstract = "Septic tank systems (STS) are widely used to treat domestic wastewater from individual dwellings in rural areas but are a potential source of water pollution. However, their contribution to freshwater eutrophication and impacts on human health are uncertain and difficult to quantify. Five case studies are presented to highlight the issues underpinning this problem. Uncertainty exists over the numbers and locations of STS because registration is not fully implemented in all regions. Underestimating the numbers of STS located in a catchment can lead to overestimation of the relative contribution from diffuse sources such as agriculture. In turn, this may lead to potential delays in meeting water quality limits due to disproportionate targeting of potential sources. System performance is uncertain due to a lack of information on factors (such as siting, design, age, nature and level of maintenance, proximity to a watercourse) that affect nutrient retention rates. Many systems still discharge directly to a watercourse, or to a drainage network closely connected to a watercourse despite prohibition of such discharges. Their effect on water quality is also uncertain because current nutrient abatement policies ignore the temporal variation in nutrient loading that can influence ecological response in streams and connecting ditches. These case studies show that although STS constitute a relatively small (often <10{\%}) portion of total annual catchment nutrient loads, they can still significantly increase in-stream nutrient concentrations, especially during low flow periods in summer. STS may therefore be a greater risk to riverine eutrophication and human health than is currently assumed. More sophisticated resolution of source apportionment is needed to fully capture water quality impairment due to clustering of STS along stream networks. Targeted surveys and public awareness campaigns are useful tools for identifying failing STS, improving STS maintenance and highlighting alternative treatment options for use in catchment areas that are especially sensitive or valuable. These case studies support the need for a risk-based policy of STS registration and regulation governing maintenance to avoid further declines in the ecosystem services our freshwaters provide.",
keywords = "Policy",
author = "P.J.A. Withers and L. May and H.P. Jarvie and Philip Jordan and D. Doody and R.H. Foy and M. Bechmann and S. Cooksley and R. Dils and N. Deal",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.023",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "71--82",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Nutrient emissions to water from septic tank systems in rural catchments: Uncertainties and implications for policy. / Withers, P.J.A.; May, L.; Jarvie, H.P.; Jordan, Philip; Doody, D.; Foy, R.H.; Bechmann, M.; Cooksley, S.; Dils, R.; Deal, N.

In: Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 24, 2012, p. 71-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nutrient emissions to water from septic tank systems in rural catchments: Uncertainties and implications for policy

AU - Withers, P.J.A.

AU - May, L.

AU - Jarvie, H.P.

AU - Jordan, Philip

AU - Doody, D.

AU - Foy, R.H.

AU - Bechmann, M.

AU - Cooksley, S.

AU - Dils, R.

AU - Deal, N.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Septic tank systems (STS) are widely used to treat domestic wastewater from individual dwellings in rural areas but are a potential source of water pollution. However, their contribution to freshwater eutrophication and impacts on human health are uncertain and difficult to quantify. Five case studies are presented to highlight the issues underpinning this problem. Uncertainty exists over the numbers and locations of STS because registration is not fully implemented in all regions. Underestimating the numbers of STS located in a catchment can lead to overestimation of the relative contribution from diffuse sources such as agriculture. In turn, this may lead to potential delays in meeting water quality limits due to disproportionate targeting of potential sources. System performance is uncertain due to a lack of information on factors (such as siting, design, age, nature and level of maintenance, proximity to a watercourse) that affect nutrient retention rates. Many systems still discharge directly to a watercourse, or to a drainage network closely connected to a watercourse despite prohibition of such discharges. Their effect on water quality is also uncertain because current nutrient abatement policies ignore the temporal variation in nutrient loading that can influence ecological response in streams and connecting ditches. These case studies show that although STS constitute a relatively small (often <10%) portion of total annual catchment nutrient loads, they can still significantly increase in-stream nutrient concentrations, especially during low flow periods in summer. STS may therefore be a greater risk to riverine eutrophication and human health than is currently assumed. More sophisticated resolution of source apportionment is needed to fully capture water quality impairment due to clustering of STS along stream networks. Targeted surveys and public awareness campaigns are useful tools for identifying failing STS, improving STS maintenance and highlighting alternative treatment options for use in catchment areas that are especially sensitive or valuable. These case studies support the need for a risk-based policy of STS registration and regulation governing maintenance to avoid further declines in the ecosystem services our freshwaters provide.

AB - Septic tank systems (STS) are widely used to treat domestic wastewater from individual dwellings in rural areas but are a potential source of water pollution. However, their contribution to freshwater eutrophication and impacts on human health are uncertain and difficult to quantify. Five case studies are presented to highlight the issues underpinning this problem. Uncertainty exists over the numbers and locations of STS because registration is not fully implemented in all regions. Underestimating the numbers of STS located in a catchment can lead to overestimation of the relative contribution from diffuse sources such as agriculture. In turn, this may lead to potential delays in meeting water quality limits due to disproportionate targeting of potential sources. System performance is uncertain due to a lack of information on factors (such as siting, design, age, nature and level of maintenance, proximity to a watercourse) that affect nutrient retention rates. Many systems still discharge directly to a watercourse, or to a drainage network closely connected to a watercourse despite prohibition of such discharges. Their effect on water quality is also uncertain because current nutrient abatement policies ignore the temporal variation in nutrient loading that can influence ecological response in streams and connecting ditches. These case studies show that although STS constitute a relatively small (often <10%) portion of total annual catchment nutrient loads, they can still significantly increase in-stream nutrient concentrations, especially during low flow periods in summer. STS may therefore be a greater risk to riverine eutrophication and human health than is currently assumed. More sophisticated resolution of source apportionment is needed to fully capture water quality impairment due to clustering of STS along stream networks. Targeted surveys and public awareness campaigns are useful tools for identifying failing STS, improving STS maintenance and highlighting alternative treatment options for use in catchment areas that are especially sensitive or valuable. These case studies support the need for a risk-based policy of STS registration and regulation governing maintenance to avoid further declines in the ecosystem services our freshwaters provide.

KW - Policy

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.023

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.023

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 71

EP - 82

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

T2 - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -