Numerical simulations of vented hydrogen deflagrations in a medium-scale enclosure

I.C. Tolias, J.R. Stewart, A. Newton, J. Keenan, D. Makarov, J.R. Hoyes, V Molkov, A.G. Venetsanos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A validation study was performed to investigate the ability of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models to predict hydrogen deflagrations in vented enclosures. The validation exercise was aimed at assessing the suitability of CFD as a reliable tool for explosion safety assessments and involved comparing CFD predictions with measurements from an experiment carried out by FM Global in a 64 m3 enclosure. The enclosure included a large square vent located in the center of one of its walls. The enclosure was filled with a homogenous hydrogen-air mixture of 18% v/v composition before ignition at its center. In this paper, CFD model predictions of the transient pressure and the flame speed are compared against experimental measurements. Additionally, peak over-pressure predictions are compared against empirical correlations and the NFPA 68 vent sizing standard. The study focuses on the prediction of the first overpressure peak that is generated by external explosion. The agreement between the models’ predictions and experimental results is found to be satisfactory, which suggests that CFD models have the potential to predict explosion phenomena with reasonable accuracy. However, more extensive model validation and sensitivity studies are required before CFD models can be used with confidence in explosion safety assessments.
LanguageEnglish
PagesN/A
JournalJournal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
VolumeN/A
Issue numberN/A
Early online date28 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Hydrodynamics
Enclosures
hydrogen
Hydrogen
Computational fluid dynamics
fluid mechanics
Explosions
explosions
dynamic models
Dynamic models
Computer simulation
prediction
safety assessment
Vents
Validation Studies
Safety
Pressure
model validation
Ignition
Explosion

Keywords

  • CFD validation
  • FM Global experiment
  • vented hydrogen deflagration
  • external explosion
  • safety assessment

Cite this

Tolias, I.C. ; Stewart, J.R. ; Newton, A. ; Keenan, J. ; Makarov, D. ; Hoyes, J.R. ; Molkov, V ; Venetsanos, A.G. / Numerical simulations of vented hydrogen deflagrations in a medium-scale enclosure. In: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2017 ; Vol. N/A, No. N/A. pp. N/A.
@article{33e9036a06314eda87bab192cb6f2887,
title = "Numerical simulations of vented hydrogen deflagrations in a medium-scale enclosure",
abstract = "A validation study was performed to investigate the ability of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models to predict hydrogen deflagrations in vented enclosures. The validation exercise was aimed at assessing the suitability of CFD as a reliable tool for explosion safety assessments and involved comparing CFD predictions with measurements from an experiment carried out by FM Global in a 64 m3 enclosure. The enclosure included a large square vent located in the center of one of its walls. The enclosure was filled with a homogenous hydrogen-air mixture of 18{\%} v/v composition before ignition at its center. In this paper, CFD model predictions of the transient pressure and the flame speed are compared against experimental measurements. Additionally, peak over-pressure predictions are compared against empirical correlations and the NFPA 68 vent sizing standard. The study focuses on the prediction of the first overpressure peak that is generated by external explosion. The agreement between the models’ predictions and experimental results is found to be satisfactory, which suggests that CFD models have the potential to predict explosion phenomena with reasonable accuracy. However, more extensive model validation and sensitivity studies are required before CFD models can be used with confidence in explosion safety assessments.",
keywords = "CFD validation, FM Global experiment, vented hydrogen deflagration, external explosion, safety assessment",
author = "I.C. Tolias and J.R. Stewart and A. Newton and J. Keenan and D. Makarov and J.R. Hoyes and V Molkov and A.G. Venetsanos",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.jlp.2017.10.014",
language = "English",
volume = "N/A",
pages = "N/A",
journal = "Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries",
issn = "0950-4230",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "N/A",

}

Numerical simulations of vented hydrogen deflagrations in a medium-scale enclosure. / Tolias, I.C.; Stewart, J.R.; Newton, A.; Keenan, J.; Makarov, D.; Hoyes, J.R.; Molkov, V; Venetsanos, A.G.

In: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. N/A, No. N/A, 28.10.2017, p. N/A.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical simulations of vented hydrogen deflagrations in a medium-scale enclosure

AU - Tolias, I.C.

AU - Stewart, J.R.

AU - Newton, A.

AU - Keenan, J.

AU - Makarov, D.

AU - Hoyes, J.R.

AU - Molkov, V

AU - Venetsanos, A.G.

PY - 2017/10/28

Y1 - 2017/10/28

N2 - A validation study was performed to investigate the ability of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models to predict hydrogen deflagrations in vented enclosures. The validation exercise was aimed at assessing the suitability of CFD as a reliable tool for explosion safety assessments and involved comparing CFD predictions with measurements from an experiment carried out by FM Global in a 64 m3 enclosure. The enclosure included a large square vent located in the center of one of its walls. The enclosure was filled with a homogenous hydrogen-air mixture of 18% v/v composition before ignition at its center. In this paper, CFD model predictions of the transient pressure and the flame speed are compared against experimental measurements. Additionally, peak over-pressure predictions are compared against empirical correlations and the NFPA 68 vent sizing standard. The study focuses on the prediction of the first overpressure peak that is generated by external explosion. The agreement between the models’ predictions and experimental results is found to be satisfactory, which suggests that CFD models have the potential to predict explosion phenomena with reasonable accuracy. However, more extensive model validation and sensitivity studies are required before CFD models can be used with confidence in explosion safety assessments.

AB - A validation study was performed to investigate the ability of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models to predict hydrogen deflagrations in vented enclosures. The validation exercise was aimed at assessing the suitability of CFD as a reliable tool for explosion safety assessments and involved comparing CFD predictions with measurements from an experiment carried out by FM Global in a 64 m3 enclosure. The enclosure included a large square vent located in the center of one of its walls. The enclosure was filled with a homogenous hydrogen-air mixture of 18% v/v composition before ignition at its center. In this paper, CFD model predictions of the transient pressure and the flame speed are compared against experimental measurements. Additionally, peak over-pressure predictions are compared against empirical correlations and the NFPA 68 vent sizing standard. The study focuses on the prediction of the first overpressure peak that is generated by external explosion. The agreement between the models’ predictions and experimental results is found to be satisfactory, which suggests that CFD models have the potential to predict explosion phenomena with reasonable accuracy. However, more extensive model validation and sensitivity studies are required before CFD models can be used with confidence in explosion safety assessments.

KW - CFD validation

KW - FM Global experiment

KW - vented hydrogen deflagration

KW - external explosion

KW - safety assessment

U2 - 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.10.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.10.014

M3 - Article

VL - N/A

SP - N/A

JO - Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

T2 - Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

JF - Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

SN - 0950-4230

IS - N/A

ER -