Northern Ireland and Brexit: Three effects on 'the border in the mind'

Cathy Gormley-Heenan, Arthur Aughey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For those who spoke on behalf of leave voters, the result on 23 June 2016 meant the people of the United Kingdom taking back ‘control’ or getting their ‘own country back’. However, two parts of the UK did not vote leave: Scotland and Northern Ireland. Here the significant counterpoint to ‘taking back control is ‘waking up in a different country’ and this sentiment has unique political gravity. Its unique gravity involves two distinct but intimately related matters. The first concerns the politics of identity. The vote was mainly, if not entirely, along nationalist/unionist lines, confirming an old division: unionists were staking a ‘British’ identity by voting leave, and nationalists an Irish one by voting remain. The second concerns borders. The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement of 1998 meant taking the border out of Irish politics. Brexit means the border between the EU and the UK running across the island as a sovereign ‘frontier’. Though this second matter is discussed mainly in terms of the implications for free movement of people and goods, we argue that it is freighted with meanings of identity. Brexit involves a ‘border in the mind’, those shifts in self-understanding, individually and collectively, attendant upon the referendum. This article examines this ‘border in the mind’ according to its effects on identity, politics and the constitution and their implications for political stability in Northern Ireland.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-15
JournalBritish Journal of Politics and International Relations
Volumen/a
Early online date8 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

politics
voting
voter
political stability
gravity
referendum
constitution
EU
border
effect
goods

Keywords

  • Brexit
  • Northern Ireland
  • peace process
  • identity
  • constitution

Cite this

@article{79b41077309646a1b3c5306238057075,
title = "Northern Ireland and Brexit: Three effects on 'the border in the mind'",
abstract = "For those who spoke on behalf of leave voters, the result on 23 June 2016 meant the people of the United Kingdom taking back ‘control’ or getting their ‘own country back’. However, two parts of the UK did not vote leave: Scotland and Northern Ireland. Here the significant counterpoint to ‘taking back control is ‘waking up in a different country’ and this sentiment has unique political gravity. Its unique gravity involves two distinct but intimately related matters. The first concerns the politics of identity. The vote was mainly, if not entirely, along nationalist/unionist lines, confirming an old division: unionists were staking a ‘British’ identity by voting leave, and nationalists an Irish one by voting remain. The second concerns borders. The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement of 1998 meant taking the border out of Irish politics. Brexit means the border between the EU and the UK running across the island as a sovereign ‘frontier’. Though this second matter is discussed mainly in terms of the implications for free movement of people and goods, we argue that it is freighted with meanings of identity. Brexit involves a ‘border in the mind’, those shifts in self-understanding, individually and collectively, attendant upon the referendum. This article examines this ‘border in the mind’ according to its effects on identity, politics and the constitution and their implications for political stability in Northern Ireland.",
keywords = "Brexit, Northern Ireland, peace process, identity, constitution",
author = "Cathy Gormley-Heenan and Arthur Aughey",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1177/1369148117711060",
language = "English",
volume = "n/a",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "British Journal of Politics and International Relations",
issn = "1369-1481",

}

Northern Ireland and Brexit: Three effects on 'the border in the mind'. / Gormley-Heenan, Cathy; Aughey, Arthur.

In: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. n/a, 08.06.2017, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Northern Ireland and Brexit: Three effects on 'the border in the mind'

AU - Gormley-Heenan, Cathy

AU - Aughey, Arthur

PY - 2017/6/8

Y1 - 2017/6/8

N2 - For those who spoke on behalf of leave voters, the result on 23 June 2016 meant the people of the United Kingdom taking back ‘control’ or getting their ‘own country back’. However, two parts of the UK did not vote leave: Scotland and Northern Ireland. Here the significant counterpoint to ‘taking back control is ‘waking up in a different country’ and this sentiment has unique political gravity. Its unique gravity involves two distinct but intimately related matters. The first concerns the politics of identity. The vote was mainly, if not entirely, along nationalist/unionist lines, confirming an old division: unionists were staking a ‘British’ identity by voting leave, and nationalists an Irish one by voting remain. The second concerns borders. The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement of 1998 meant taking the border out of Irish politics. Brexit means the border between the EU and the UK running across the island as a sovereign ‘frontier’. Though this second matter is discussed mainly in terms of the implications for free movement of people and goods, we argue that it is freighted with meanings of identity. Brexit involves a ‘border in the mind’, those shifts in self-understanding, individually and collectively, attendant upon the referendum. This article examines this ‘border in the mind’ according to its effects on identity, politics and the constitution and their implications for political stability in Northern Ireland.

AB - For those who spoke on behalf of leave voters, the result on 23 June 2016 meant the people of the United Kingdom taking back ‘control’ or getting their ‘own country back’. However, two parts of the UK did not vote leave: Scotland and Northern Ireland. Here the significant counterpoint to ‘taking back control is ‘waking up in a different country’ and this sentiment has unique political gravity. Its unique gravity involves two distinct but intimately related matters. The first concerns the politics of identity. The vote was mainly, if not entirely, along nationalist/unionist lines, confirming an old division: unionists were staking a ‘British’ identity by voting leave, and nationalists an Irish one by voting remain. The second concerns borders. The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement of 1998 meant taking the border out of Irish politics. Brexit means the border between the EU and the UK running across the island as a sovereign ‘frontier’. Though this second matter is discussed mainly in terms of the implications for free movement of people and goods, we argue that it is freighted with meanings of identity. Brexit involves a ‘border in the mind’, those shifts in self-understanding, individually and collectively, attendant upon the referendum. This article examines this ‘border in the mind’ according to its effects on identity, politics and the constitution and their implications for political stability in Northern Ireland.

KW - Brexit

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - peace process

KW - identity

KW - constitution

U2 - 10.1177/1369148117711060

DO - 10.1177/1369148117711060

M3 - Article

VL - n/a

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

T2 - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

JF - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

SN - 1369-1481

ER -