'Non-Standard Employment and European Union Employment Regulation'

Julia S O'Connor

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    This chapter reviews critically the intersection of non-standard employment and EU employment regulation. It is developed around a two-fold argument. First, taking off from an examination of non-standard employment in terms of magnitude and cross-national variation it is demonstrated that it is not a homogeneous category in terms of workers’ rights and even within particular forms of non-standard employment there is considerable variation in terms of employment characteristics and work quality. Second, the scope and coverage of EU employment regulation relating to non-standard employment does not afford protection to individuals in the most precarious elements of non-standard employment because they are not likely to be in a position to vindicate the formal rights afforded by such regulation and many are in forms of employment that are not explicitly targeted by EU employment regulation. The first section of the chapter focuses on disaggregating the concept of non-standard employment. The second section discusses the three forms of non-standard employment that are explicitly targeted by EU directives – part-time and fixed-term contract employment and temporary agency work. This is followed by a discussion of self-employment and precarious employment enclaves. The concluding section situates the analysis in the context of the broad thrust of the European Employment Strategy. It points to the problem of vindicating formal rights and accessing social protection in the context of structural change which has intensified the demands for increased labour market flexibility in a labour market increasingly characterized by a shrinking middle in terms of employment quality as reflected in economic security and by declining union density. It asks if the present regulatory framework at EU and member state level is adequate to meet the needs of those in the most vulnerable employment situations and if there is a role for the Open Method of Coordination process in terms of enhancing the visibility and framing the policy options in relation to these needs.
    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationNon-Standard Employment in Europe Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses
    EditorsMax Koch, Martin Fritz
    Place of PublicationHoundmills, Basingstoke, England
    Pages46-63
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

    Fingerprint

    regulation
    EU
    labor market
    European Employment Strategy
    precarious employment
    open method of coordination
    term contract
    employment situation
    self-employment
    structural change
    flexibility
    coverage
    worker
    examination
    present

    Cite this

    O'Connor, J. S. (2013). 'Non-Standard Employment and European Union Employment Regulation'. In M. Koch, & M. Fritz (Eds.), Non-Standard Employment in Europe Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses (pp. 46-63). Houndmills, Basingstoke, England.
    O'Connor, Julia S. / 'Non-Standard Employment and European Union Employment Regulation'. Non-Standard Employment in Europe Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses. editor / Max Koch ; Martin Fritz. Houndmills, Basingstoke, England, 2013. pp. 46-63
    @inbook{e93039c7696345b19d6163e4b8dbae3c,
    title = "'Non-Standard Employment and European Union Employment Regulation'",
    abstract = "This chapter reviews critically the intersection of non-standard employment and EU employment regulation. It is developed around a two-fold argument. First, taking off from an examination of non-standard employment in terms of magnitude and cross-national variation it is demonstrated that it is not a homogeneous category in terms of workers’ rights and even within particular forms of non-standard employment there is considerable variation in terms of employment characteristics and work quality. Second, the scope and coverage of EU employment regulation relating to non-standard employment does not afford protection to individuals in the most precarious elements of non-standard employment because they are not likely to be in a position to vindicate the formal rights afforded by such regulation and many are in forms of employment that are not explicitly targeted by EU employment regulation. The first section of the chapter focuses on disaggregating the concept of non-standard employment. The second section discusses the three forms of non-standard employment that are explicitly targeted by EU directives – part-time and fixed-term contract employment and temporary agency work. This is followed by a discussion of self-employment and precarious employment enclaves. The concluding section situates the analysis in the context of the broad thrust of the European Employment Strategy. It points to the problem of vindicating formal rights and accessing social protection in the context of structural change which has intensified the demands for increased labour market flexibility in a labour market increasingly characterized by a shrinking middle in terms of employment quality as reflected in economic security and by declining union density. It asks if the present regulatory framework at EU and member state level is adequate to meet the needs of those in the most vulnerable employment situations and if there is a role for the Open Method of Coordination process in terms of enhancing the visibility and framing the policy options in relation to these needs.",
    author = "O'Connor, {Julia S}",
    year = "2013",
    month = "11",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-0-230-28026-7",
    pages = "46--63",
    editor = "Max Koch and Martin Fritz",
    booktitle = "Non-Standard Employment in Europe Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses",

    }

    O'Connor, JS 2013, 'Non-Standard Employment and European Union Employment Regulation'. in M Koch & M Fritz (eds), Non-Standard Employment in Europe Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses. Houndmills, Basingstoke, England, pp. 46-63.

    'Non-Standard Employment and European Union Employment Regulation'. / O'Connor, Julia S.

    Non-Standard Employment in Europe Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses. ed. / Max Koch; Martin Fritz. Houndmills, Basingstoke, England, 2013. p. 46-63.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - 'Non-Standard Employment and European Union Employment Regulation'

    AU - O'Connor, Julia S

    PY - 2013/11

    Y1 - 2013/11

    N2 - This chapter reviews critically the intersection of non-standard employment and EU employment regulation. It is developed around a two-fold argument. First, taking off from an examination of non-standard employment in terms of magnitude and cross-national variation it is demonstrated that it is not a homogeneous category in terms of workers’ rights and even within particular forms of non-standard employment there is considerable variation in terms of employment characteristics and work quality. Second, the scope and coverage of EU employment regulation relating to non-standard employment does not afford protection to individuals in the most precarious elements of non-standard employment because they are not likely to be in a position to vindicate the formal rights afforded by such regulation and many are in forms of employment that are not explicitly targeted by EU employment regulation. The first section of the chapter focuses on disaggregating the concept of non-standard employment. The second section discusses the three forms of non-standard employment that are explicitly targeted by EU directives – part-time and fixed-term contract employment and temporary agency work. This is followed by a discussion of self-employment and precarious employment enclaves. The concluding section situates the analysis in the context of the broad thrust of the European Employment Strategy. It points to the problem of vindicating formal rights and accessing social protection in the context of structural change which has intensified the demands for increased labour market flexibility in a labour market increasingly characterized by a shrinking middle in terms of employment quality as reflected in economic security and by declining union density. It asks if the present regulatory framework at EU and member state level is adequate to meet the needs of those in the most vulnerable employment situations and if there is a role for the Open Method of Coordination process in terms of enhancing the visibility and framing the policy options in relation to these needs.

    AB - This chapter reviews critically the intersection of non-standard employment and EU employment regulation. It is developed around a two-fold argument. First, taking off from an examination of non-standard employment in terms of magnitude and cross-national variation it is demonstrated that it is not a homogeneous category in terms of workers’ rights and even within particular forms of non-standard employment there is considerable variation in terms of employment characteristics and work quality. Second, the scope and coverage of EU employment regulation relating to non-standard employment does not afford protection to individuals in the most precarious elements of non-standard employment because they are not likely to be in a position to vindicate the formal rights afforded by such regulation and many are in forms of employment that are not explicitly targeted by EU employment regulation. The first section of the chapter focuses on disaggregating the concept of non-standard employment. The second section discusses the three forms of non-standard employment that are explicitly targeted by EU directives – part-time and fixed-term contract employment and temporary agency work. This is followed by a discussion of self-employment and precarious employment enclaves. The concluding section situates the analysis in the context of the broad thrust of the European Employment Strategy. It points to the problem of vindicating formal rights and accessing social protection in the context of structural change which has intensified the demands for increased labour market flexibility in a labour market increasingly characterized by a shrinking middle in terms of employment quality as reflected in economic security and by declining union density. It asks if the present regulatory framework at EU and member state level is adequate to meet the needs of those in the most vulnerable employment situations and if there is a role for the Open Method of Coordination process in terms of enhancing the visibility and framing the policy options in relation to these needs.

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 978-0-230-28026-7

    SP - 46

    EP - 63

    BT - Non-Standard Employment in Europe Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses

    A2 - Koch, Max

    A2 - Fritz, Martin

    CY - Houndmills, Basingstoke, England

    ER -

    O'Connor JS. 'Non-Standard Employment and European Union Employment Regulation'. In Koch M, Fritz M, editors, Non-Standard Employment in Europe Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses. Houndmills, Basingstoke, England. 2013. p. 46-63