Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between minority/majority status and psychological adjustment, as measured by the GHQ-12. Rather than using religious labels in Northern Ireland to define minority/majority status, the authors hypothesized that such status is more contingent upon the local area context. Using a purer operationalization of minority/majority status, the authors found no evidence of an `ethnic density effect'. Implications for the questionable validity of the `crucial test' of the selection and causation hypotheses are discussed. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 137-141 |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - Mar 2002 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'New approaches to the `crucial' test of the causation and selection hypotheses in a Northern Irish sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver