Moving beyond randomized controlled trials in the evaluation of compulsory community treatment

Craig Duncan, Scott Weich, Graham Moon , Liz Twigg, Sarah-Jane Fenton, Kamaldeep Bhui, Alastair Canaway , David Crepaz-Keay, Patrick Keown, Jason Madan, Orla McBride, Helen Parsons, Swaran Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Compulsory community treatment for people with severe mental illness remains controversial due to conflicting research evidence. Recently, there have been challenges to the conventional view that trial-based evidence should take precedence. This paper adds to these challenges in three ways. First, it emphasizes the need for critiques of trials to engage with conceptual and not just technical issues. Second, it develops a critique of trials centred on both how we can have knowledge and what it is we can have knowledge of. Third, it uses this critique to develop a research strategy that capitalizes on the information in large-scale datasets.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-22
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Early online date29 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Research
Datasets

Keywords

  • compulsory community treatment
  • mental health policy
  • realist evaluation
  • randomised controlled trials
  • clinical effectiveness
  • randomized controlled trials

Cite this

Duncan, Craig ; Weich, Scott ; Moon , Graham ; Twigg, Liz ; Fenton, Sarah-Jane ; Bhui, Kamaldeep ; Canaway , Alastair ; Crepaz-Keay, David ; Keown, Patrick ; Madan, Jason ; McBride, Orla ; Parsons, Helen ; Singh, Swaran. / Moving beyond randomized controlled trials in the evaluation of compulsory community treatment. In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2019 ; pp. 1-22.
@article{6668c0c1eb384432bcda567d5b1eb1d3,
title = "Moving beyond randomized controlled trials in the evaluation of compulsory community treatment",
abstract = "Compulsory community treatment for people with severe mental illness remains controversial due to conflicting research evidence. Recently, there have been challenges to the conventional view that trial-based evidence should take precedence. This paper adds to these challenges in three ways. First, it emphasizes the need for critiques of trials to engage with conceptual and not just technical issues. Second, it develops a critique of trials centred on both how we can have knowledge and what it is we can have knowledge of. Third, it uses this critique to develop a research strategy that capitalizes on the information in large-scale datasets.",
keywords = "compulsory community treatment, mental health policy, realist evaluation, randomised controlled trials, clinical effectiveness, randomized controlled trials",
author = "Craig Duncan and Scott Weich and Graham Moon and Liz Twigg and Sarah-Jane Fenton and Kamaldeep Bhui and Alastair Canaway and David Crepaz-Keay and Patrick Keown and Jason Madan and Orla McBride and Helen Parsons and Swaran Singh",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1111/jep.13245",
language = "English",
pages = "1--22",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",

}

Duncan, C, Weich, S, Moon , G, Twigg, L, Fenton, S-J, Bhui, K, Canaway , A, Crepaz-Keay, D, Keown, P, Madan, J, McBride, O, Parsons, H & Singh, S 2019, 'Moving beyond randomized controlled trials in the evaluation of compulsory community treatment', Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13245

Moving beyond randomized controlled trials in the evaluation of compulsory community treatment. / Duncan, Craig; Weich, Scott; Moon , Graham ; Twigg, Liz; Fenton, Sarah-Jane; Bhui, Kamaldeep; Canaway , Alastair ; Crepaz-Keay, David; Keown, Patrick; Madan, Jason ; McBride, Orla; Parsons, Helen; Singh, Swaran.

In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 29.07.2019, p. 1-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moving beyond randomized controlled trials in the evaluation of compulsory community treatment

AU - Duncan, Craig

AU - Weich, Scott

AU - Moon , Graham

AU - Twigg, Liz

AU - Fenton, Sarah-Jane

AU - Bhui, Kamaldeep

AU - Canaway , Alastair

AU - Crepaz-Keay, David

AU - Keown, Patrick

AU - Madan, Jason

AU - McBride, Orla

AU - Parsons, Helen

AU - Singh, Swaran

PY - 2019/7/29

Y1 - 2019/7/29

N2 - Compulsory community treatment for people with severe mental illness remains controversial due to conflicting research evidence. Recently, there have been challenges to the conventional view that trial-based evidence should take precedence. This paper adds to these challenges in three ways. First, it emphasizes the need for critiques of trials to engage with conceptual and not just technical issues. Second, it develops a critique of trials centred on both how we can have knowledge and what it is we can have knowledge of. Third, it uses this critique to develop a research strategy that capitalizes on the information in large-scale datasets.

AB - Compulsory community treatment for people with severe mental illness remains controversial due to conflicting research evidence. Recently, there have been challenges to the conventional view that trial-based evidence should take precedence. This paper adds to these challenges in three ways. First, it emphasizes the need for critiques of trials to engage with conceptual and not just technical issues. Second, it develops a critique of trials centred on both how we can have knowledge and what it is we can have knowledge of. Third, it uses this critique to develop a research strategy that capitalizes on the information in large-scale datasets.

KW - compulsory community treatment

KW - mental health policy

KW - realist evaluation

KW - randomised controlled trials

KW - clinical effectiveness

KW - randomized controlled trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070308083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jep.13245

DO - 10.1111/jep.13245

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

T2 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

SN - 1356-1294

ER -