Microneedle Arrays Allow Lower Microbial Penetration Than Hypodermic Needles In Vitro

R. F. Donnelly, T. R. R. Singh, M. M. Tunney, D. I. J. Morrow, Paul McCarron, C. O'Mahony, A. D. Woolfson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study we determined, for the first time, the ability of microorganisms to traverse microneedle-induced holes using two different in vitro models. When employing SilescolA (R) membranes, the numbers of Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis crossing the membranes were an order of magnitude lower when the membranes were punctured by microneedles rather than a 21G hypodermic needle. Apart from the movement of C. albicans across hypodermic needle-punctured membranes, where 40.2% of the microbial load on control membranes permeated the barrier over 24 h, the numbers of permeating microorganisms was less than 5% of the original microbial load on control membranes. Experiments employing excised porcine skin and radiolabelled microorganisms showed that the numbers of microorganisms penetrating skin beyond the stratum corneum were approximately an order of magnitude greater than the numbers crossing SilescolA (R) membranes in the corresponding experiments. Approximately 10(3) cfu of each microorganism adhered to hypodermic needles during insertion. The numbers of microorganisms adhering to MN arrays were an order of magnitude higher in each case. We have shown here that microneedle puncture resulted in significantly less microbial penetration than did hypodermic needle puncture and that no microorganisms crossed the viable epidermis in microneedle-punctured skin, in contrast to needle-punctured skin. Given the antimicrobial properties of skin, it is, therefore, likely that application of microneedle arrays to skin in an appropriate manner would not cause either local or systemic infection in normal circumstances in immune-competent patients. In supporting widespread clinical use of microneedle-based delivery systems, appropriate animal studies are now needed to conclusively demonstrate this in vivo. Safety in patients will be enhanced by aseptic or sterile manufacture and by fabricating microneedles from self-disabling materials (e.g. dissolving or biodegradable polymers) to prevent inappropriate or accidental reuse.
LanguageEnglish
Pages2513-2522
JournalPharmaceutical Research
Volume26
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Needles
Membranes
Skin
Candida albicans
Punctures
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Patient Safety
In Vitro Techniques
Epidermis
Cornea
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Polymers
Swine
Infection

Cite this

Donnelly, R. F., Singh, T. R. R., Tunney, M. M., Morrow, D. I. J., McCarron, P., O'Mahony, C., & Woolfson, A. D. (2009). Microneedle Arrays Allow Lower Microbial Penetration Than Hypodermic Needles In Vitro. Pharmaceutical Research, 26(11), 2513-2522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-009-9967-2
Donnelly, R. F. ; Singh, T. R. R. ; Tunney, M. M. ; Morrow, D. I. J. ; McCarron, Paul ; O'Mahony, C. ; Woolfson, A. D. / Microneedle Arrays Allow Lower Microbial Penetration Than Hypodermic Needles In Vitro. In: Pharmaceutical Research. 2009 ; Vol. 26, No. 11. pp. 2513-2522.
@article{4d4c6972088e4fea9a4f81debcccf51a,
title = "Microneedle Arrays Allow Lower Microbial Penetration Than Hypodermic Needles In Vitro",
abstract = "In this study we determined, for the first time, the ability of microorganisms to traverse microneedle-induced holes using two different in vitro models. When employing SilescolA (R) membranes, the numbers of Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis crossing the membranes were an order of magnitude lower when the membranes were punctured by microneedles rather than a 21G hypodermic needle. Apart from the movement of C. albicans across hypodermic needle-punctured membranes, where 40.2{\%} of the microbial load on control membranes permeated the barrier over 24 h, the numbers of permeating microorganisms was less than 5{\%} of the original microbial load on control membranes. Experiments employing excised porcine skin and radiolabelled microorganisms showed that the numbers of microorganisms penetrating skin beyond the stratum corneum were approximately an order of magnitude greater than the numbers crossing SilescolA (R) membranes in the corresponding experiments. Approximately 10(3) cfu of each microorganism adhered to hypodermic needles during insertion. The numbers of microorganisms adhering to MN arrays were an order of magnitude higher in each case. We have shown here that microneedle puncture resulted in significantly less microbial penetration than did hypodermic needle puncture and that no microorganisms crossed the viable epidermis in microneedle-punctured skin, in contrast to needle-punctured skin. Given the antimicrobial properties of skin, it is, therefore, likely that application of microneedle arrays to skin in an appropriate manner would not cause either local or systemic infection in normal circumstances in immune-competent patients. In supporting widespread clinical use of microneedle-based delivery systems, appropriate animal studies are now needed to conclusively demonstrate this in vivo. Safety in patients will be enhanced by aseptic or sterile manufacture and by fabricating microneedles from self-disabling materials (e.g. dissolving or biodegradable polymers) to prevent inappropriate or accidental reuse.",
author = "Donnelly, {R. F.} and Singh, {T. R. R.} and Tunney, {M. M.} and Morrow, {D. I. J.} and Paul McCarron and C. O'Mahony and Woolfson, {A. D.}",
note = "PT: J; TC: 0",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/s11095-009-9967-2",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "2513--2522",
journal = "Pharmaceutical Research",
issn = "0724-8741",
number = "11",

}

Donnelly, RF, Singh, TRR, Tunney, MM, Morrow, DIJ, McCarron, P, O'Mahony, C & Woolfson, AD 2009, 'Microneedle Arrays Allow Lower Microbial Penetration Than Hypodermic Needles In Vitro', Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2513-2522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-009-9967-2

Microneedle Arrays Allow Lower Microbial Penetration Than Hypodermic Needles In Vitro. / Donnelly, R. F.; Singh, T. R. R.; Tunney, M. M.; Morrow, D. I. J.; McCarron, Paul; O'Mahony, C.; Woolfson, A. D.

In: Pharmaceutical Research, Vol. 26, No. 11, 2009, p. 2513-2522.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microneedle Arrays Allow Lower Microbial Penetration Than Hypodermic Needles In Vitro

AU - Donnelly, R. F.

AU - Singh, T. R. R.

AU - Tunney, M. M.

AU - Morrow, D. I. J.

AU - McCarron, Paul

AU - O'Mahony, C.

AU - Woolfson, A. D.

N1 - PT: J; TC: 0

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In this study we determined, for the first time, the ability of microorganisms to traverse microneedle-induced holes using two different in vitro models. When employing SilescolA (R) membranes, the numbers of Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis crossing the membranes were an order of magnitude lower when the membranes were punctured by microneedles rather than a 21G hypodermic needle. Apart from the movement of C. albicans across hypodermic needle-punctured membranes, where 40.2% of the microbial load on control membranes permeated the barrier over 24 h, the numbers of permeating microorganisms was less than 5% of the original microbial load on control membranes. Experiments employing excised porcine skin and radiolabelled microorganisms showed that the numbers of microorganisms penetrating skin beyond the stratum corneum were approximately an order of magnitude greater than the numbers crossing SilescolA (R) membranes in the corresponding experiments. Approximately 10(3) cfu of each microorganism adhered to hypodermic needles during insertion. The numbers of microorganisms adhering to MN arrays were an order of magnitude higher in each case. We have shown here that microneedle puncture resulted in significantly less microbial penetration than did hypodermic needle puncture and that no microorganisms crossed the viable epidermis in microneedle-punctured skin, in contrast to needle-punctured skin. Given the antimicrobial properties of skin, it is, therefore, likely that application of microneedle arrays to skin in an appropriate manner would not cause either local or systemic infection in normal circumstances in immune-competent patients. In supporting widespread clinical use of microneedle-based delivery systems, appropriate animal studies are now needed to conclusively demonstrate this in vivo. Safety in patients will be enhanced by aseptic or sterile manufacture and by fabricating microneedles from self-disabling materials (e.g. dissolving or biodegradable polymers) to prevent inappropriate or accidental reuse.

AB - In this study we determined, for the first time, the ability of microorganisms to traverse microneedle-induced holes using two different in vitro models. When employing SilescolA (R) membranes, the numbers of Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis crossing the membranes were an order of magnitude lower when the membranes were punctured by microneedles rather than a 21G hypodermic needle. Apart from the movement of C. albicans across hypodermic needle-punctured membranes, where 40.2% of the microbial load on control membranes permeated the barrier over 24 h, the numbers of permeating microorganisms was less than 5% of the original microbial load on control membranes. Experiments employing excised porcine skin and radiolabelled microorganisms showed that the numbers of microorganisms penetrating skin beyond the stratum corneum were approximately an order of magnitude greater than the numbers crossing SilescolA (R) membranes in the corresponding experiments. Approximately 10(3) cfu of each microorganism adhered to hypodermic needles during insertion. The numbers of microorganisms adhering to MN arrays were an order of magnitude higher in each case. We have shown here that microneedle puncture resulted in significantly less microbial penetration than did hypodermic needle puncture and that no microorganisms crossed the viable epidermis in microneedle-punctured skin, in contrast to needle-punctured skin. Given the antimicrobial properties of skin, it is, therefore, likely that application of microneedle arrays to skin in an appropriate manner would not cause either local or systemic infection in normal circumstances in immune-competent patients. In supporting widespread clinical use of microneedle-based delivery systems, appropriate animal studies are now needed to conclusively demonstrate this in vivo. Safety in patients will be enhanced by aseptic or sterile manufacture and by fabricating microneedles from self-disabling materials (e.g. dissolving or biodegradable polymers) to prevent inappropriate or accidental reuse.

U2 - 10.1007/s11095-009-9967-2

DO - 10.1007/s11095-009-9967-2

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 2513

EP - 2522

JO - Pharmaceutical Research

T2 - Pharmaceutical Research

JF - Pharmaceutical Research

SN - 0724-8741

IS - 11

ER -