Methods Used to Assess Early Mathematical Skills in 2-Year-Olds: A Review of the Literature

Hanna Weiers, Sohnia Ghattaura, Gaia Scerif, Francesco Sella, Victoria Simms, Iro Xenidou-Dervou, Camilla Gilmore

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

When children are aged around 2 years many of the early foundations of mathematical skills are developing. Understanding this is important to shed light on theories of mathematical development. Nevertheless, little research has investigated 2-year-olds’ early mathematical abilities, with most research focussing on either infants (aged 0-1 years) or pre-schoolers (aged 3-5 years). One possible reason for this lack of research may be the challenges associated with the methods used with this age group. Here, we review the methods used to assess 2-year-olds’ basic mathematical skills and identify the gaps and issues with those methods. Our findings indicate several issues, both with individual methods used to test specific skills but also some common challenges applicable across all measures and skills. We discuss the identified issues and highlight a need for more appropriate approaches and for alternative methods of administration to better evaluate 2-year-olds’ mathematical skills.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70001
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalInfant and Child Development
Volume34
Issue number1
Early online date19 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 28 Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Infant and Child Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Data Access Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Keywords

  • mathematical skills
  • numerical skills
  • cognitive development
  • methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methods Used to Assess Early Mathematical Skills in 2-Year-Olds: A Review of the Literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this