Measuring quality of life in multiple sclerosis: not as simple as it sounds

L Nicholl, JC Hobart, AFL Cramp, Andrea Lowe-Strong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data from a clinical study presented an opportunity to examine the psychometric properties of the Leeds Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life scale (LMSQoL), which has undergone limited psychometric evaluation. LMSQoL and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-S4) data were collected from 90 people with multiple sclerosis (MS) living in the community. Standard psychometric methods to examine data quality, scaling assumptions, scale to sample targeting, reliability, validity, and responsiveness were employed. The LMSQoL satisfied criteria for data quality (no missing data), scaling assumptions (item-total correlations: 0.24-0.56), reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.71), and demonstrated responsiveness (effect size: 0.34). Correlations between the LMSQoL and MSQoL-54 physical (range: -0.02 to -0.50) and emotional subscales (range: -0.38 to -0.65) were similar; the magnitude and pattern was not consistent with predictions based on the construct purported to be measured by the LMSQoL. The LMSQoL satisfied many psychometric criteria in this small study, however it was difficult to interpret the validity data. From this, two fundamental measurement issues are highlighted. Firstly, current methods of examining rating scales provide only circumstantial evidence of validity, secondly, health-rating scales should be developed on the basis of clear conceptual definitions.
LanguageEnglish
Pages708-712
JournalMultiple Sclerosis
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Multiple Sclerosis
Quality of Life
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Health

Cite this

Nicholl, L., Hobart, JC., Cramp, AFL., & Lowe-Strong, A. (2005). Measuring quality of life in multiple sclerosis: not as simple as it sounds. 11(6), 708-712. https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458505ms1235oa
Nicholl, L ; Hobart, JC ; Cramp, AFL ; Lowe-Strong, Andrea. / Measuring quality of life in multiple sclerosis: not as simple as it sounds. 2005 ; Vol. 11, No. 6. pp. 708-712.
@article{9017a5d5615f413bae8b93e54ed8a1ee,
title = "Measuring quality of life in multiple sclerosis: not as simple as it sounds",
abstract = "Data from a clinical study presented an opportunity to examine the psychometric properties of the Leeds Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life scale (LMSQoL), which has undergone limited psychometric evaluation. LMSQoL and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-S4) data were collected from 90 people with multiple sclerosis (MS) living in the community. Standard psychometric methods to examine data quality, scaling assumptions, scale to sample targeting, reliability, validity, and responsiveness were employed. The LMSQoL satisfied criteria for data quality (no missing data), scaling assumptions (item-total correlations: 0.24-0.56), reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.71), and demonstrated responsiveness (effect size: 0.34). Correlations between the LMSQoL and MSQoL-54 physical (range: -0.02 to -0.50) and emotional subscales (range: -0.38 to -0.65) were similar; the magnitude and pattern was not consistent with predictions based on the construct purported to be measured by the LMSQoL. The LMSQoL satisfied many psychometric criteria in this small study, however it was difficult to interpret the validity data. From this, two fundamental measurement issues are highlighted. Firstly, current methods of examining rating scales provide only circumstantial evidence of validity, secondly, health-rating scales should be developed on the basis of clear conceptual definitions.",
author = "L Nicholl and JC Hobart and AFL Cramp and Andrea Lowe-Strong",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1191/1352458505ms1235oa",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "708--712",
number = "6",

}

Nicholl, L, Hobart, JC, Cramp, AFL & Lowe-Strong, A 2005, 'Measuring quality of life in multiple sclerosis: not as simple as it sounds', vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 708-712. https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458505ms1235oa

Measuring quality of life in multiple sclerosis: not as simple as it sounds. / Nicholl, L; Hobart, JC; Cramp, AFL; Lowe-Strong, Andrea.

Vol. 11, No. 6, 2005, p. 708-712.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring quality of life in multiple sclerosis: not as simple as it sounds

AU - Nicholl, L

AU - Hobart, JC

AU - Cramp, AFL

AU - Lowe-Strong, Andrea

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Data from a clinical study presented an opportunity to examine the psychometric properties of the Leeds Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life scale (LMSQoL), which has undergone limited psychometric evaluation. LMSQoL and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-S4) data were collected from 90 people with multiple sclerosis (MS) living in the community. Standard psychometric methods to examine data quality, scaling assumptions, scale to sample targeting, reliability, validity, and responsiveness were employed. The LMSQoL satisfied criteria for data quality (no missing data), scaling assumptions (item-total correlations: 0.24-0.56), reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.71), and demonstrated responsiveness (effect size: 0.34). Correlations between the LMSQoL and MSQoL-54 physical (range: -0.02 to -0.50) and emotional subscales (range: -0.38 to -0.65) were similar; the magnitude and pattern was not consistent with predictions based on the construct purported to be measured by the LMSQoL. The LMSQoL satisfied many psychometric criteria in this small study, however it was difficult to interpret the validity data. From this, two fundamental measurement issues are highlighted. Firstly, current methods of examining rating scales provide only circumstantial evidence of validity, secondly, health-rating scales should be developed on the basis of clear conceptual definitions.

AB - Data from a clinical study presented an opportunity to examine the psychometric properties of the Leeds Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life scale (LMSQoL), which has undergone limited psychometric evaluation. LMSQoL and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-S4) data were collected from 90 people with multiple sclerosis (MS) living in the community. Standard psychometric methods to examine data quality, scaling assumptions, scale to sample targeting, reliability, validity, and responsiveness were employed. The LMSQoL satisfied criteria for data quality (no missing data), scaling assumptions (item-total correlations: 0.24-0.56), reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.71), and demonstrated responsiveness (effect size: 0.34). Correlations between the LMSQoL and MSQoL-54 physical (range: -0.02 to -0.50) and emotional subscales (range: -0.38 to -0.65) were similar; the magnitude and pattern was not consistent with predictions based on the construct purported to be measured by the LMSQoL. The LMSQoL satisfied many psychometric criteria in this small study, however it was difficult to interpret the validity data. From this, two fundamental measurement issues are highlighted. Firstly, current methods of examining rating scales provide only circumstantial evidence of validity, secondly, health-rating scales should be developed on the basis of clear conceptual definitions.

U2 - 10.1191/1352458505ms1235oa

DO - 10.1191/1352458505ms1235oa

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 708

EP - 712

IS - 6

ER -