Manganese detection in marine sediments: anodic vs. cathodic stripping voltammetry

CE Banks, J Kruusma, RR Moore, P Tomcik, J Peters, J Davis, S Komorsky-Lovric, RG Compton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    57 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Three different electroanalytical techniques for the detection of manganese in marine sediments are evaluated. The anodic stripping voltammetry of manganese at an in situ bismuth-film-modified boron-doped diamond electrode and cathodic stripping voltammetry at a carbon paste electrode are shown to lack the required sensitivity and reproducibility whereas cathodic stripping voltammetry at a bare boron-doped diamond electrode is shown to be reliable and selective with a limit of detection, from applying a 60 s accumulation period of 7.4 x 10(-7) M and a sensitivity of 0.24 A M-1. The method was used to evaluate the manganese content of marine sediments taken from Sibenik. Croatia. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)423-429
    JournalTalanta
    Volume65
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2005

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Manganese detection in marine sediments: anodic vs. cathodic stripping voltammetry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Banks, CE., Kruusma, J., Moore, RR., Tomcik, P., Peters, J., Davis, J., Komorsky-Lovric, S., & Compton, RG. (2005). Manganese detection in marine sediments: anodic vs. cathodic stripping voltammetry. Talanta, 65(2), 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.06.038