Manganese detection in marine sediments: anodic vs. cathodic stripping voltammetry

CE Banks, J Kruusma, RR Moore, P Tomcik, J Peters, J Davis, S Komorsky-Lovric, RG Compton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    52 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Three different electroanalytical techniques for the detection of manganese in marine sediments are evaluated. The anodic stripping voltammetry of manganese at an in situ bismuth-film-modified boron-doped diamond electrode and cathodic stripping voltammetry at a carbon paste electrode are shown to lack the required sensitivity and reproducibility whereas cathodic stripping voltammetry at a bare boron-doped diamond electrode is shown to be reliable and selective with a limit of detection, from applying a 60 s accumulation period of 7.4 x 10(-7) M and a sensitivity of 0.24 A M-1. The method was used to evaluate the manganese content of marine sediments taken from Sibenik. Croatia. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages423-429
    JournalTalanta
    Volume65
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2005

    Fingerprint

    Voltammetry
    Manganese
    Sediments
    Diamond
    Boron
    Electrodes
    Bismuth
    Ointments
    Carbon

    Cite this

    Banks, CE., Kruusma, J., Moore, RR., Tomcik, P., Peters, J., Davis, J., ... Compton, RG. (2005). Manganese detection in marine sediments: anodic vs. cathodic stripping voltammetry. 65(2), 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.06.038
    Banks, CE ; Kruusma, J ; Moore, RR ; Tomcik, P ; Peters, J ; Davis, J ; Komorsky-Lovric, S ; Compton, RG. / Manganese detection in marine sediments: anodic vs. cathodic stripping voltammetry. 2005 ; Vol. 65, No. 2. pp. 423-429.
    @article{2477e06e6c8b4723893ceefefd25153c,
    title = "Manganese detection in marine sediments: anodic vs. cathodic stripping voltammetry",
    abstract = "Three different electroanalytical techniques for the detection of manganese in marine sediments are evaluated. The anodic stripping voltammetry of manganese at an in situ bismuth-film-modified boron-doped diamond electrode and cathodic stripping voltammetry at a carbon paste electrode are shown to lack the required sensitivity and reproducibility whereas cathodic stripping voltammetry at a bare boron-doped diamond electrode is shown to be reliable and selective with a limit of detection, from applying a 60 s accumulation period of 7.4 x 10(-7) M and a sensitivity of 0.24 A M-1. The method was used to evaluate the manganese content of marine sediments taken from Sibenik. Croatia. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
    author = "CE Banks and J Kruusma and RR Moore and P Tomcik and J Peters and J Davis and S Komorsky-Lovric and RG Compton",
    year = "2005",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.talanta.2004.06.038",
    language = "English",
    volume = "65",
    pages = "423--429",
    number = "2",

    }

    Banks, CE, Kruusma, J, Moore, RR, Tomcik, P, Peters, J, Davis, J, Komorsky-Lovric, S & Compton, RG 2005, 'Manganese detection in marine sediments: anodic vs. cathodic stripping voltammetry', vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.06.038

    Manganese detection in marine sediments: anodic vs. cathodic stripping voltammetry. / Banks, CE; Kruusma, J; Moore, RR; Tomcik, P; Peters, J; Davis, J; Komorsky-Lovric, S; Compton, RG.

    Vol. 65, No. 2, 01.2005, p. 423-429.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Manganese detection in marine sediments: anodic vs. cathodic stripping voltammetry

    AU - Banks, CE

    AU - Kruusma, J

    AU - Moore, RR

    AU - Tomcik, P

    AU - Peters, J

    AU - Davis, J

    AU - Komorsky-Lovric, S

    AU - Compton, RG

    PY - 2005/1

    Y1 - 2005/1

    N2 - Three different electroanalytical techniques for the detection of manganese in marine sediments are evaluated. The anodic stripping voltammetry of manganese at an in situ bismuth-film-modified boron-doped diamond electrode and cathodic stripping voltammetry at a carbon paste electrode are shown to lack the required sensitivity and reproducibility whereas cathodic stripping voltammetry at a bare boron-doped diamond electrode is shown to be reliable and selective with a limit of detection, from applying a 60 s accumulation period of 7.4 x 10(-7) M and a sensitivity of 0.24 A M-1. The method was used to evaluate the manganese content of marine sediments taken from Sibenik. Croatia. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    AB - Three different electroanalytical techniques for the detection of manganese in marine sediments are evaluated. The anodic stripping voltammetry of manganese at an in situ bismuth-film-modified boron-doped diamond electrode and cathodic stripping voltammetry at a carbon paste electrode are shown to lack the required sensitivity and reproducibility whereas cathodic stripping voltammetry at a bare boron-doped diamond electrode is shown to be reliable and selective with a limit of detection, from applying a 60 s accumulation period of 7.4 x 10(-7) M and a sensitivity of 0.24 A M-1. The method was used to evaluate the manganese content of marine sediments taken from Sibenik. Croatia. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.talanta.2004.06.038

    DO - 10.1016/j.talanta.2004.06.038

    M3 - Article

    VL - 65

    SP - 423

    EP - 429

    IS - 2

    ER -