In this chapter, we explore the significance given to the management of (dis)abled bodies within the field of Paralympic Sport. At the outset it is important to state that we use the prefix “(dis)” connected to the words “abled” and “ability” to make it clear the that we celebrate that the practice of high-performance sport is about embodied physical capital, and, while the public and policy maker alike often fail to see the sport because of the disability (see DePauw 1997), we see the pursuit of physical betterment as a product of ability. It is our aim to undertake a critical examination of the International Paralympic Committee’s (IPC) management of (dis)abled bodies. We are particularly interested in the IPC’s classification process that impacts upon the athletes and shapes their participation within the Paralympics. The Paralympic classification process has three stages:1. Does the athlete have an eligible impairment for this sport? 2. Does the athlete’s eligible impairment meet the minimum disability criteria of the sport? 3. Which sport class describes the athlete’s activity limitation most accurately?
|Title of host publication||Managing the Paralympics|
|Editors||Darcy Simon, Frawley Stephen, Adair Daryl|
|Place of Publication||London|
|Publication status||Published - 13 Feb 2017|
- International Paralympic Committee
P. David, H., & Kitchin, P. J. (2017). Managing Paralympic Bodies: The Technology of Classification and Its Impact on (Dis)abled Athletes. In D. Simon, F. Stephen, & A. Daryl (Eds.), Managing the Paralympics (Vol. 1, pp. 113-131). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43522-4_5