Macro- and Micro-Political Vernaculizations of Rights: Human Rights and Abortion Discourses in Northern Ireland

Fiona Bloomer, Claire Pierson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How abortion is dealt with in law and policy is shaped through the multiple political and societal discourses on the issue within a particular society. Debate on abortion is constantly in flux, with progressive and regressive movements witnessed globally. This paper examines the translation of human rights norms into discourses on abortion in Northern Ireland, a region where abortion is highly restricted, with extensive contemporary public debate into potential liberalization of abortion law. This paper emanates from research examining political debates on abortion in Northern Ireland and contrasts findings with recent civil society developments, identifying competing narratives of human rights with regard to abortion at the macro- and micro-political level. The paper identifies the complexities of using human rights as a lobbying tool, and questions the utility of rights-based arguments in furthering abortion law reform. The paper concludes that a legalistic rights-based approach may have limited efficacy in creating a more nuanced debate and perspective on abortion in Northern Ireland but that it has particular resonance in arguing for limited reform in extreme cases.
LanguageEnglish
Pages173-185
JournalHealth and Human Rights
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date19 Jun 2017
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Northern Ireland
abortion
human rights
discourse
Lobbying
Research
law reform
Law
liberalization
civil society
narrative
reform

Keywords

  • abortion
  • political discourse
  • human rights

Cite this

@article{e50d9e82ce264f6daafbe49e5018dbfd,
title = "Macro- and Micro-Political Vernaculizations of Rights: Human Rights and Abortion Discourses in Northern Ireland",
abstract = "How abortion is dealt with in law and policy is shaped through the multiple political and societal discourses on the issue within a particular society. Debate on abortion is constantly in flux, with progressive and regressive movements witnessed globally. This paper examines the translation of human rights norms into discourses on abortion in Northern Ireland, a region where abortion is highly restricted, with extensive contemporary public debate into potential liberalization of abortion law. This paper emanates from research examining political debates on abortion in Northern Ireland and contrasts findings with recent civil society developments, identifying competing narratives of human rights with regard to abortion at the macro- and micro-political level. The paper identifies the complexities of using human rights as a lobbying tool, and questions the utility of rights-based arguments in furthering abortion law reform. The paper concludes that a legalistic rights-based approach may have limited efficacy in creating a more nuanced debate and perspective on abortion in Northern Ireland but that it has particular resonance in arguing for limited reform in extreme cases.",
keywords = "abortion, political discourse, human rights",
author = "Fiona Bloomer and Claire Pierson",
note = "No DOI found, but article states Open Access; uploaded to 'Other files'",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "19",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "173--185",
journal = "Health and Human Rights",
issn = "1079-0969",
number = "1",

}

Macro- and Micro-Political Vernaculizations of Rights: Human Rights and Abortion Discourses in Northern Ireland. / Bloomer, Fiona; Pierson, Claire.

In: Health and Human Rights, Vol. 19, No. 1, 19.06.2017, p. 173-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Macro- and Micro-Political Vernaculizations of Rights: Human Rights and Abortion Discourses in Northern Ireland

AU - Bloomer, Fiona

AU - Pierson, Claire

N1 - No DOI found, but article states Open Access; uploaded to 'Other files'

PY - 2017/6/19

Y1 - 2017/6/19

N2 - How abortion is dealt with in law and policy is shaped through the multiple political and societal discourses on the issue within a particular society. Debate on abortion is constantly in flux, with progressive and regressive movements witnessed globally. This paper examines the translation of human rights norms into discourses on abortion in Northern Ireland, a region where abortion is highly restricted, with extensive contemporary public debate into potential liberalization of abortion law. This paper emanates from research examining political debates on abortion in Northern Ireland and contrasts findings with recent civil society developments, identifying competing narratives of human rights with regard to abortion at the macro- and micro-political level. The paper identifies the complexities of using human rights as a lobbying tool, and questions the utility of rights-based arguments in furthering abortion law reform. The paper concludes that a legalistic rights-based approach may have limited efficacy in creating a more nuanced debate and perspective on abortion in Northern Ireland but that it has particular resonance in arguing for limited reform in extreme cases.

AB - How abortion is dealt with in law and policy is shaped through the multiple political and societal discourses on the issue within a particular society. Debate on abortion is constantly in flux, with progressive and regressive movements witnessed globally. This paper examines the translation of human rights norms into discourses on abortion in Northern Ireland, a region where abortion is highly restricted, with extensive contemporary public debate into potential liberalization of abortion law. This paper emanates from research examining political debates on abortion in Northern Ireland and contrasts findings with recent civil society developments, identifying competing narratives of human rights with regard to abortion at the macro- and micro-political level. The paper identifies the complexities of using human rights as a lobbying tool, and questions the utility of rights-based arguments in furthering abortion law reform. The paper concludes that a legalistic rights-based approach may have limited efficacy in creating a more nuanced debate and perspective on abortion in Northern Ireland but that it has particular resonance in arguing for limited reform in extreme cases.

KW - abortion

KW - political discourse

KW - human rights

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 173

EP - 185

JO - Health and Human Rights

T2 - Health and Human Rights

JF - Health and Human Rights

SN - 1079-0969

IS - 1

ER -