Looking Beyond the Systematic Review:: Choosing an appropriate review typology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Knowledge synthesis is an important part of research; It provides readers/researchers with the current level of understanding of a topic, identifies gaps in a field of knowledge and directs future research pathways. The gold standard of knowledge synthesis is commonly agreed to be 'systematic review', however a variety of review typologies exist. The type of review should be chosen not through common practice but because it is appropriate for the task and aligns with the methodological underpinnings of a proposed project.
LanguageEnglish
JournalImaging and Therapy Practice
VolumeMay 2019
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Research

Cite this

@article{a0f511da8104486d961286b50056a6d2,
title = "Looking Beyond the Systematic Review:: Choosing an appropriate review typology",
abstract = "Knowledge synthesis is an important part of research; It provides readers/researchers with the current level of understanding of a topic, identifies gaps in a field of knowledge and directs future research pathways. The gold standard of knowledge synthesis is commonly agreed to be 'systematic review', however a variety of review typologies exist. The type of review should be chosen not through common practice but because it is appropriate for the task and aligns with the methodological underpinnings of a proposed project.",
author = "Terri Gilleece and Lynn Dunwoody and Claire Campbell and Rachel Harris",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "May 2019",
journal = "Imaging and Therapy Practice",
issn = "2052-0727",

}

Looking Beyond the Systematic Review: Choosing an appropriate review typology. / Gilleece, Terri; Dunwoody, Lynn; Campbell, Claire; Harris, Rachel.

In: Imaging and Therapy Practice, Vol. May 2019, 01.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Looking Beyond the Systematic Review:

T2 - Imaging and Therapy Practice

AU - Gilleece, Terri

AU - Dunwoody, Lynn

AU - Campbell, Claire

AU - Harris, Rachel

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Knowledge synthesis is an important part of research; It provides readers/researchers with the current level of understanding of a topic, identifies gaps in a field of knowledge and directs future research pathways. The gold standard of knowledge synthesis is commonly agreed to be 'systematic review', however a variety of review typologies exist. The type of review should be chosen not through common practice but because it is appropriate for the task and aligns with the methodological underpinnings of a proposed project.

AB - Knowledge synthesis is an important part of research; It provides readers/researchers with the current level of understanding of a topic, identifies gaps in a field of knowledge and directs future research pathways. The gold standard of knowledge synthesis is commonly agreed to be 'systematic review', however a variety of review typologies exist. The type of review should be chosen not through common practice but because it is appropriate for the task and aligns with the methodological underpinnings of a proposed project.

M3 - Article

VL - May 2019

JO - Imaging and Therapy Practice

JF - Imaging and Therapy Practice

SN - 2052-0727

ER -