Looking Beyond the Systematic Review:: Choosing an appropriate review typology

Terri Gilleece; Lynn Dunwoody; Claire Campbell; Rachel Harris

Looking Beyond the Systematic Review: Choosing an appropriate review typology

Terri Gilleece, Lynn Dunwoody, Claire Campbell, Rachel Harris

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Knowledge synthesis is an important part of research; It provides readers/researchers with the current level of understanding of a topic, identifies gaps in a field of knowledge and directs future research pathways. The gold standard of knowledge synthesis is commonly agreed to be 'systematic review', however a variety of review typologies exist. The type of review should be chosen not through common practice but because it is appropriate for the task and aligns with the methodological underpinnings of a proposed project.

Original language	English
Journal	Imaging and Therapy Practice
Volume	May 2019
Publication status	Published (in print/issue) - 1 May 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

Accepted ManuscriptAuthor Accepted Manuscript, 180 KB

Cite this

@article{a0f511da8104486d961286b50056a6d2,

title = "Looking Beyond the Systematic Review:: Choosing an appropriate review typology",

abstract = "Knowledge synthesis is an important part of research; It provides readers/researchers with the current level of understanding of a topic, identifies gaps in a field of knowledge and directs future research pathways. The gold standard of knowledge synthesis is commonly agreed to be 'systematic review', however a variety of review typologies exist. The type of review should be chosen not through common practice but because it is appropriate for the task and aligns with the methodological underpinnings of a proposed project.",

author = "Terri Gilleece and Lynn Dunwoody and Claire Campbell and Rachel Harris",

year = "2019",

month = may,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "May 2019",

journal = "Imaging and Therapy Practice",

issn = "2052-0727",

publisher = "Deeson",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Looking Beyond the Systematic Review:

T2 - Choosing an appropriate review typology

AU - Gilleece, Terri

AU - Dunwoody, Lynn

AU - Campbell, Claire

AU - Harris, Rachel

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Knowledge synthesis is an important part of research; It provides readers/researchers with the current level of understanding of a topic, identifies gaps in a field of knowledge and directs future research pathways. The gold standard of knowledge synthesis is commonly agreed to be 'systematic review', however a variety of review typologies exist. The type of review should be chosen not through common practice but because it is appropriate for the task and aligns with the methodological underpinnings of a proposed project.

AB - Knowledge synthesis is an important part of research; It provides readers/researchers with the current level of understanding of a topic, identifies gaps in a field of knowledge and directs future research pathways. The gold standard of knowledge synthesis is commonly agreed to be 'systematic review', however a variety of review typologies exist. The type of review should be chosen not through common practice but because it is appropriate for the task and aligns with the methodological underpinnings of a proposed project.

M3 - Article

SN - 2052-0727

VL - May 2019

JO - Imaging and Therapy Practice

JF - Imaging and Therapy Practice

ER -

Looking Beyond the Systematic Review: Choosing an appropriate review typology

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this