Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of the implication design choices have on embodied material emissions, with a view to better understand how the life cycle assessment of buildings can be better integrated into the building design process. The analysis is applied to a pilot net zero emission building (nZEB) called the Living Laboratory, which has been developed by the Norwegian Research Centre on Zero Emission Buildings. The impact of embodied emissions is presented through a series of sensitivity analyses that consider the definition of a functional unit and system boundary. The results for embodied emissions are presented for each building component, and highlight important design drivers for the reduction of emissions in building construction.
Compared to the previous ZEB projects, the total embodied emission result from the Living Laboratory of 23.5kgCO2eq/m2/yr is considered high. This is due to the building having a more comprehensive material inventory, which includes more life cycle phases, and uses a higher level of technical equipment and state-of-the-art materials.
The results show that the outer roof, photovoltaic system and outer walls drive the highest emissions. Further analysis revealed that in some cases high emissions came from the production phase, whereas in other cases it originated from the replacement phase. The results show that timber, electrical components and metal were responsible for driving the highest emissions. The results show that certain design choices, such as a change in foundation design, can reduce embodied emissions by 21%, which could be further reduced if low carbon concrete was used.
Compared to the previous ZEB projects, the total embodied emission result from the Living Laboratory of 23.5kgCO2eq/m2/yr is considered high. This is due to the building having a more comprehensive material inventory, which includes more life cycle phases, and uses a higher level of technical equipment and state-of-the-art materials.
The results show that the outer roof, photovoltaic system and outer walls drive the highest emissions. Further analysis revealed that in some cases high emissions came from the production phase, whereas in other cases it originated from the replacement phase. The results show that timber, electrical components and metal were responsible for driving the highest emissions. The results show that certain design choices, such as a change in foundation design, can reduce embodied emissions by 21%, which could be further reduced if low carbon concrete was used.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | CESB16 – Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2016 |
Place of Publication | Prague |
Publisher | Grada Publishing |
Pages | 1381-1388 |
Number of pages | 8 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-80-271-0248-8 |
Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 2016 |
Event | Central Europe towards Sustainable Building, Prague 2016 (CESB16) - Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic Duration: 22 Jun 2016 → 24 Jun 2016 https://www.buildup.eu/en/events/central-europe-towards-sustainable-building-prague-2016-cesb16 |
Conference
Conference | Central Europe towards Sustainable Building, Prague 2016 (CESB16) |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | CESB16 |
Country/Territory | Czech Republic |
City | Prague |
Period | 22/06/16 → 24/06/16 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- net zero emission buildings
- embodied emissions materials