Abstract
Reducing process CO₂ emissions from lime production is essential for decarbonising one of the most carbon‑intensive industries. This study provides the first comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) of indirectly heated calcium carbonate looping (IHCaL) applied to lime plants, evaluating five scenarios: a reference plant, two tail‑end IHCaL configurations, and two fully integrated IHCaL configurations, each fuelled by lignite or solid recovered fuel (SRF). Using ReCiPe 2016 midpoint and endpoint methods and a functional unit of 1 kg of lime, environmental impacts were quantified across 18 categories and assessed using Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis (10,000 iterations).
All IHCaL scenarios substantially reduce global warming impact relative to the reference case, with reductions exceeding 80%. SRF‑fuelled systems achieve net‑negative mean global warming impact due to avoided landfill burdens, and tail-end configurations further benefited from electricity export. However, lignite‑fuelled IHCaL scenarios increase freshwater and marine ecotoxicity, freshwater eutrophication, and human carcinogenic toxicity, driven mainly by upstream lignite mining. SRF‑fuelled scenarios avoid these burdens but have higher mineral and fossil resource scarcity impacts related to natural gas use in SRF processing.
IHCaL offers a strong route to decarbonisation of lime production, provided fuel supply chains are carefully managed. The findings show SRF as the environmentally preferred fuel and underscore the importance of upstream process optimisation and region‑specific electricity modelling.
All IHCaL scenarios substantially reduce global warming impact relative to the reference case, with reductions exceeding 80%. SRF‑fuelled systems achieve net‑negative mean global warming impact due to avoided landfill burdens, and tail-end configurations further benefited from electricity export. However, lignite‑fuelled IHCaL scenarios increase freshwater and marine ecotoxicity, freshwater eutrophication, and human carcinogenic toxicity, driven mainly by upstream lignite mining. SRF‑fuelled scenarios avoid these burdens but have higher mineral and fossil resource scarcity impacts related to natural gas use in SRF processing.
IHCaL offers a strong route to decarbonisation of lime production, provided fuel supply chains are carefully managed. The findings show SRF as the environmentally preferred fuel and underscore the importance of upstream process optimisation and region‑specific electricity modelling.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 104745 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-20 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control |
| Volume | 155 |
| Issue number | 104745 |
| Early online date | 31 Jul 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published online - 31 Jul 2026 |
Bibliographical note
1750-5836/© 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.Funding
This study has been carried out in the framework of the ANICA project. This project ANICA is funded through the ACT program (Accelerating CCS Technologies, Horizon2020 Project No 294,766) and DESNZ (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, UK) and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. We also thank all ANICA project partners for their assistance with process modelling and assessment.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
Keywords
- Lime production
- Carbon capture
- Indirectly heated calcium carbonate looping
- Life cycle assessment
- Solid recovered fuel
- Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Life cycle assessment of the indirectly heated calcium carbonate looping carbon capture for lime production'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver